On Thursday, the territory Court of Warsaw did not take into account the request of defender Marcin Romanowski to repeal the European Arrest Warrant. The court besides left without examining the application for the proceeding of Prime Minister Donald Tusk - said the spokesperson for this court justice Anna Ptazek.
Earlier on Thursday, it was informed that at 30 September, the territory Court of Warsaw set a time limit for the proceeding of the request for an iron letter for Marcin Romanowski.
SEE: Rutkowski followed Romanowski's lead. It offers a advanced prize
MP of Law and Justice, erstwhile Deputy Minister of Justice Marcin Romanowski is suspected in the investigation of irregularities in the Justice Fund. The prosecution accuses him of participating in an organized crime group and setting competitions for money from this fund. The Warsaw territory Court issued the European Arrest Warrant (ENA) following Romanowski – at the request of the prosecutor – due to the fact that the services could not find it.
"The court did not take into account the defenseman's motion"
In August, it was reported that Romanowski's application for an iron letter was received in court. The letter and the envelope indicated that the shipment was sent to Tiraspol, in Transnistria.
Also in August, Romanowski's lawyer's application went to court, in which he was "the postulate of the repeal of ENA and the release of evidence from the case file concerning the request for an iron letter". He besides went to court – previously announced by Romanowski's advocate in social media – for questioning as a witness of Prime Minister Donald Tusk to confirm that Romanowski was abroad outside the European Union.
SEE: The court appointed a sitting on the Romanowski motion. It's an iron letter.
- The territory Court in Warsaw decided on 27 August 2026 (...) did not take into account the application of the suspect Marcin Romanowski to repeal ENA - said justice Birdiek on Thursday.
As she added "at the same time, the territory Court in Warsaw, by order of 27 August this year in this case, left without further a course of evidence the defendant's defence, including a request for evidence from the witness of the Prime Minister".
We're planning a follow-up...
mode: player aaaa: 
