The neodar­vism of the world!

The dentist detected me with hyperdonation, which is an additional tooth. I did the X-ray. I haven't picked up yet, so I don't know how many extra teeth I have, but I know for certain that I'll be able to look out in the picture. I have this due to the fact that for me it is crucial interior wisdom and it needs to be seen beyond the world's surface, to find the dream hidden behind how many everyday lives. This 3rd eye is inquisitive, intrusive. I believe that the tiny 1 has it, the majority do not want to interfere in a given attempt, but their de-nerves and irritants erstwhile I say it.

Since I can have a hyperdonation, a trans-humanic jake, I have specified thinking:

Hyperdonation is an anomal, but it may be a precurrency of changes in the evolutional leading man to the formation of a fresh chain of teeth. This may be a comeback to what may have been, but has disappeared, no little lies dormant in what might have been, any of the effects.

In the past they did not live long adequate to lose their teeth after 70 years of life had more meaning for endurance or reproduction. The current dimension of life is over 80 years. And so the 3 sets would be useful, due to the fact that the problem is: prostheses, implants, regenicity.

The ability to regenerate the teeth can give a re-reduced re-productive advantage – e.g. by allowing older people to be active care for the offspring, which will increase the natural growth – the growth of the 3 can become permanent. This has already been the case in the evolution of the man, due to the fact that we are a unified task in which the grandfathers and the grandmothers have a crucial re-production, which will aid the grandchildren.

People evidently request their parents to last without them. It is not the norm of animals, due to the fact that there are many species that are ready to live without the participation of immediate initials. It should be noted that the evolution has already taken part in the work of the first staff. As they become as essential as those from the first post, they will gotta have 3 sets of teeth.

In the process of evolution, the man’s teeth have decreased, and the happiness has improved – the results are proble with eights (some of the wisdom) that are not frequently present. Even though this is due to the improvement of the teeth, they are inactive very active and not very dormant. It is so possible to say that a individual has more flexibility than is presently the case.

As in another mammals:

1. Monofidontism. 1 set throughout life — the delfins, any of them.
2. Di­fiodontism. 2 sections: milk and solid — people, dogs, cats, the majority of saks.
3. Polyfidontism. Many times, the sun, manna, kangaroo.

Only this evolution until the 3rd set of teeth is not complete, due to the fact that it would gotta last for another 1000 years. This includes technology, including sto­matology. There will be no evolutional pre­cation on the back of the teeth, due to the fact that this is going to accomplish technicality.

In Japan and the U.S., there are already experiencing the stimulation of the link of teeth for growth-enhancing, tissue-based engineering to the culture of the full teeth from the cells of the cells of the cells of the cells of the cells of the cells of the cells, the farmmatic awakening of the stems of the teeth.

The first investigation on our minds indicated that it could consequence in an increase in extra vet teeth after a natural limite. The tests on the people are quessence. Biolologic evolution goes slow – but bioengineering can accelerate it.

From this point of view, it is more general: the biocolonial evolution of the human being is already behind us, already if we do not change, due to the fact that whatever we request to evolve, we are much faster. For this reason I have already written repeatedly and have proved that trans-humandom is inevitable.

And these teeth are not truly needed, due to the fact that in general we will not request to be able to dance as much as we request to, and we will not request to bite this, and we will not request to be able to retaliate.

The fact that the technology takes over the function of a natural feature does not mean that the end of a mostly defined evolution, but that it will change its pyratore — it will not be a simple biodetermination. It is no longer the case, but the routing, which is an intelligent task as they wish. In this version of transhumation, it is not the end of evolution, but its fresh fasa: neodarvism of the world.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>