.
This is an embarrassing event, but this is the full IIIRP/Polin – horror, shame and shame
The IIIRP/Polin electorate should be pleased that Duda's leader was not treated as an intruder, but as a vassal – possibly a small and sad that as 1 of the inferior vassals – no, but as specified unfortunately they have the rank of leader in the seniors of Washington and IIIRP/Polin. In fact, it was good that he was not treated like Zelenski, due to the fact that it could have been.
At the same time as Duda's leader besides appeared in the US at a Conservative conference another vasal, M. Morawiecki and even spoke and a erstwhile Anglo-Saxon service agent, R. Sikorski, presently head of MFA IIIRP/Polin.
.
The Zionist PO-PiS is well aware that the presence of US troops on Polish dirt is simply a warrant for their PO-PiS power and for the durability of Zionist government IIIRP/Polin.
Anti-Polish shmandation will always and everywhere be treated as shmandation, besides in the salons of rulers.
In fact, the leader of Duda and his "companiment" should now be asked at least to reimburse the fuel costs for this pilgrimage and the ten-minute prostrates for D. Trump.
At the most, the candidate for the leader's table, a certain Nawrocki, can benefit from it, due to the fact that that is most likely all this was about – but it's besides costly an event and why should I, a Pole, as a taxpayer, pay for any Szmondack pilgrimages of the anti-Polish element, what do I get from it (?).
The President
PS
But possibly a better title would be: "Duda and friends questioned in the US" – the same thing, and beggars are so brutal and non-Christian.
_____________________________
What did Duda take out of Trump?
Text for:https://cygnus.neon24.net/post/179827,co-zzebral-duda-u-trumpa
author:Krzysztof J. Wojtas
__________________
The fact that it was a “scrupulous” visit – I don't think it's essential to convince anyone.
A fewer years ago, drawing out the likely changes on the political stage, I pointed out that the US would retreat from Europe only by maintaining a support base for Israel.
While aware that this is simply a burden for the US, but "canonical" due to the function of judaic communities.
The reason is the same – “cash, teddy bear, cash”, i.e. the weakening of the dollar against the increasing function of BRICS and payments no longer in dollars, but in national currencies.
The U.S. as a planet gendarme, the only world-wide power, faced with expanding intervention requirements in the failure of its own industry, ceased to be able to fulfil their role.
Trump's erstwhile word of office has already been a request for greater arms spending in Europe, which was expected to relieve the U.S. budget of amounts supporting NATO. The U.S. wars and interventions to keep the "pax americana" consumed expanding amounts and there were less and less who wanted to participate in these interventions.
It can be argued that the collapse of belief in the "pax americana" occurred after intervention in Iraq and later in Afghanistan. The panic of terrorism – it stopped working. There are inactive countries like Poland due to unwarranted belief in American democracy.
With a monopoly on the world's reserve currency, the U.S. was printing the amount of dollars that covered the cost of surviving the army. Only that the value of $ was detached from reality through the usage of fiducial money, which led to the 2008 crisis.
There's inactive a slippery slope
Trump began to be aware of this during his first term, but his attempts to change the situation were blocked. They won forces preferring to "move forward", that is to say, to take over fresh areas for development, which was expected to offset the resulting "banja" (because it is no longer a bubble). Hence the support of Ukraine, another country that could be manipulated, and for this the interior antagonisms and resentment towards Russia were used.
Without delving into these analyses – the consequence is visible: Ukraine destroyed and besides indebted at Trump's request to return the money invested.
Poland has fulfilled a circumstantial function in this hand. Duda's earlier skills towards Trump and his patronizing treatment of Duda were due to merkantilical reasons – Poland increased military spending by buying military equipment expensively, and invited US soldiers to make good conditions for them and pay for their stay.
The masking cover was the creation of the foundations of the Tri-Sea as a separate regional entity within the EU with a large scope of autonomy. A communicative that is right to stand up to the dominant Germans in the EU.
That's how you describe the situation, without looking under the lining of politics. This, on the another hand, has a somewhat different explanation, if we take into account that the power in Poland is exercised by judaic communities. The interest was converging erstwhile Trump supported these structures, for example by forcing benefits to Israel, and as a crucial example was the celebrated resolution “447”.
But now it turns out that Trump supports not the same judaic environment that “holds power ” in Poland. The plan of the Polish environment was to make Polin with Polish and Ukrainian territories, and under the direction of this environment.
Meanwhile, Tusk’s option, or submission to Germany, appeared, and with little attention to the US. And there is besides the phenomenon of the defeat of Ukraine.
The consequence – it is possible to lose power in Poland by “powerholders”. It may turn out that they have no back-up, no external support: the U.S. is retreating, Israel is entrenched in an endless conflict, which requires US support and Ukraine is falling. In addition, Germany is on the verge of a crisis.
In this situation, incorrect decisions can consequence in riots in Poland and lead to the collapse of the existing structure (and the Law and Justice Office are equally connected to it).
The current power can be maintained by USarms stationed in Poland. Hence, this "sneaker" visit to guarantee Trump does not retreat US soldiers from Poland.
It may be assumed that the conversation was short (so only those 10 minutes and ostentatiously late): ” are you paying to keep the USArma in Poland?”
I pay.
“As long as you pay, they will. But don't number on intervention."
And I'm certain Duda with a good face for the audience was good-bye. How to bloom? The unquestionable "success" of Duda. Same as the last one.
Krzysztof J. Wojtas
