"Although modern politics, and surely American politics, appear to be pragmatic, cynical, aimed at achieving selfish, measurable, business goals, it is highly
Paweł Lisicki
"Abstracts regulation history... and Jews too.”
Felix Koneczny
"The relation between the fresh Testament and the Old Testament is, in fact, only superficial, accidental, bha, forced, and, as has already been mentioned, the only point of attraction has provided the Christian discipline with the past of first sin, even in the Old Testament isolated and of which it is inactive not used."
Arthur Schopenhauer
Shortly before Israel and the US's latest aggression on Iran Tucker Carlson interviewed the American Ambassador to Israel Mik Huckabee. Both the content of the interview and its accompanying circumstances are worth attention and deeper consideration, as they undermine many opinions on the motives of American politics, and even on politics and its sources in general. On the another hand, filled with the ideology of the alleged Christian Zionism, the ambassador's statements were modelled in the violent aggression that followed. At the same time, they were an crucial impetus to the debate in the US on judaic and Israeli American relations. For the first time in fresh U.S. history, it has been said in an open way what alleged simple people have thought and said quietly for a long time, and what believers in human rationalist theorists did not fit into intelligent minds and was pushed out of consciousness with comfortable, pretending reason and sociology of intellectual thinkers, specified as accusations of alleged conspiracy theories, and, above all, of any criticism of Israel or judaic influences; anti-Semitism or Nazism. This is besides another example of how technology affects the course of history. If it weren't for the net and the fresh democratic media, Carlson's voices, Candace Owens and another fighters for fact and honor in America could be easy suppressed, and both of them are examples that mainstream media, in which they had previously made large careers, did not tolerate their attitudes.
A while ago in the broadcast, it was a week ago, I was quoting an interview Carlson did with a senator. Ted Cruz., in which the Republican referred to a quote from the Scriptures saying that God blesses those who favour Israel erstwhile asked about the place, he could not indicate him, but he referred to the Sunday school in which he was taught. During the broadcast, a colleague stated that I stole his thought of a michałek. In an interview with M. Huckabee, the case was clarified.
This is the passage in Genesis chapter 12: “I will make you a large nation, and I will bless you, and I will make your name known; you will become a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and those who curse you, and I will curse you.” T. Carlson asked how then the passage of chapter 15 of the same book should be understood, which reads: “Then the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, "I give this land unto thy seed, from the River of Egypt (Nil, O.S.) unto the large river, the river Euphrates." The diplomat did not straight confirm the validity of specified far-reaching territorial claims, but besides did not deny them, which sparked a solid protest from Saudi Arabia. These statements are an example that the literal explanation of the Bible (such explanation is attributed mainly to Jehovah’s witnesses) is taken as seriously as possible by crucial American politicians. The diplomat was besides asked if a comparison by Benjamin Netanjah The Palestinians to the Amalekites means that the Prime Minister of Israel besides calls for the following Bible lines to be implemented: "So now go, beat Amalek, and curse all that he owns; do not pity him, but kill both men and women, youth and children, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.”
Moreover, Jehovah would punish the Israelites for saving “the best sheep and the top cattle. ” In this case, however, the ambassador tried to translate Netanyahu's words as a metaphor. The full interview is full of evasion and ambiguity, but strikingly; in no case did the American ambassador agree with any criticism of Israel and seemingly took the old Testament threat seriously. Even genocidal actions in the Gaza Strip were considered more humane than those utilized by the U.S. Army, as he felt the Israeli military warned the civilian population against being in places that they were shooting at and the American army did not. The unusual imbalance in the relation was confirmed by Huckabee’s earlier acceptance at the US embassy Jonathan Pollard – 1 of the most dangerous Israeli spies, who were sentenced to life in the United States and released after nearly 30 years.
After being settled in Israel, Pollard showed no remorse, but even encouraged Jews to imitate his attitude. Huckabee’s decision towards an Israeli spy was far different from his attitude toward an American. Although the gathering took place at the initiative of the ambassador, the US embassy refused Carlson not only authoritative protection, but even sending a car with a chauffeur to the airport, all in a situation erstwhile Israel had tried to intimidate the journalist's household earlier, and Prime Minister Netanjahu himself called him a Nazi and an anti-Semite. As a result, the interview took place in a area for diplomats at the airport. Another scandal occurred after the recording, when, as Carlson defines them, unidentified thugs began under force to halt passports questioning Carlson's associates, asking how the interview was going, whether hostile statements were falling, but besides details not related to the gathering at the airport.
Huckabee, with whom Carlson has known for 3 decades not only not intervened, but called the countryman a liar, having not listened to his story. Summing up the full situation Carlson stated that the ambassador to his own state, to whom he as a payer pays his salary, both during the interview and in the face of harassment of an American citizen acted as if he were a typical of Israel's interests alternatively than the United States, which the celebrated writer found humiliating. I, on the another hand, had déja vue due to the fact that I thought about the behaviour of Polish politicians after the execution Damiana Sobola by the Israeli army and about the death of 2 Poles in Przewodów, as a consequence of the Ukrainian effort to drag Poland into not our war with Russia.
However, similarities concern all narratives which Polish political class with a arrogant exception Grzegorz Braun leads towards Israel and Ukraine. In the conversation between the 2 Americans there were another elements suggesting that, as Poles are, according to Polish politicians, servants of Ukrainians, so are Americans servants of Jews. Throughout the interview, the issue of war and American intervention in the mediate East was discussed. Carlson recalled that the attack on Iraq was justified by false information, and the war itself was in the interests of Israel, not the US, and he would like that alternatively of conducting wars in the second hemisphere, the conditions of surviving in his vicinity in America should be taken care of. In response, he heard that Israel was defending “our” civilization, besides on the border with Lebanon. Huckabee besides underestimated the problem of aggressive behaviour of Jews towards Christians visiting the Holy Land, who are frequently spat on, (a Polish ambassador was likewise treated there).
The interview besides raised a key question about who Huckabbee says is Jewish. The answer contained 3 components: language, ethnicity, and religion. However, since the Zionists who founded Israel were nationalists or powerfully communist atheists speaking Yiddish and most frequently in Polish ethnicity remained. However, Huckabee could not answer the question why Israel did not execute DNA tests among visitors from Europe in specified a situation and, for example, does not compare them with the results of Palestinians. Why Netanyahu, whose ancestors lived in Central and east Europe for many centuries, has greater rights to land in Palestine than Muslims and Christians who have lived there continuously since antiquity. By utilizing akin logic, could the first inhabitants demand, for example, areas of England citing ancient buildings like those in Stonehenge? All these doubts came up with 1 argument: God promised Abraham land in Palestine 3800 years ago. This was not mentioned in the interview, but all Pole should light a red lamp with the inscription Polin or Judeopolonia.
Huckabee has had a long and successful political career, but in the light of the above statements for his political identity it seems more crucial that he was besides a pastor in the Baptist church. It is 1 of many Protestant sects consisting of the movement of alleged evangelists professing a peculiar religion of Christian Zionism. Their number in the United States is estimated to be around 60 million. In no case should they be combined with conventional Protestant denominations known in Europe, specified as evangelicals. Their spiritual practices are characterized by emotionality, the eruptions of which happen during immense myths, during which they experience strong exultations, and even into any kind of trance, mostly being greatly influenced by charismatic speakers and authors of best-selling books. They are disciplined voters following leaders' indications in political elections. In his excellent books, Paul Lisicki presented a thorough analysis of their beliefs, and the last work “Messiah and the 3rd Temple. The heresy of Christian Zionism, its followers and their war" is full devoted to this phenomenon and should become a reading of everyone who wants to realize it.
The religion of Christian Zionists in the shortest summary is to admit the actuality of the promises given to Abraham and his successors. How do they agree with the Christian component that is professed at the same time, for which the character of Jesus is key and the belief that his coming into the planet and his martyrdom fulfilled the prophecies of the past, and that the universal Christian church replaced the chosen nation? This is served by the explanation of 2 parallel ways to salvation: 1 Christian, but besides another, coming straight from the Old Testament, which is inactive in force.
In fresh decades, the alleged dialog which has been cultivated by subsequent popes and which has been initiated by the “Pope of Poles” by the story of “older brothers in faith”. Christians should, therefore, at the same time, love their enemies, admit that “there is no hebrew or Greek before God”, but at the same time support the modern version of the massacre of the Amalekites and another peoples or individuals who, like the Palestinians and Tucker Carlson, opposed Israel, and thus in the guess of God’s will. Notable modern rabbis proceed in their efforts to get a declaration of support for the Bible - based State of Israel from subsequent popes. Moreover, the Christian Zionists treat the Bible virtually and meticulously attribute to circumstantial historical events the fulfillment of equally circumstantial prophecies a fewer 1000 years ago. The fresh period of this realization began in 1948 with the emergence of modern Israel, the next phase being the seizure of Jerusalem after the aggression in 1967 and the business of Samaria and Judea or the West Bank of Jordan. Next is the construction of 3 temples after the demolition of the Jerusalem mosques Omar and Al-Aksa.
However, due to the fact that it would trigger a war on Muslims to do so, you gotta first destruct any organized forces that might argue it. This was served by the demolition of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and the series of specified actions logically fits in a consistent quest to destruct Iran as a state with its own advanced technologically advanced army and infrastructure allowing crucial opposition to regional hegemon. any interpretations besides identify in the Old Testament Russia and Moscow as hostile forces of Goga and Magoga from the Meszek and Tubal country described in Ezekiel. What is peculiarly disturbing about specified a restored temple is the antichrist first to regulation and then the 1,000 - year reign of Messiah will come.
How is it possible that people associated in Poland with pragmatism, freedom and realism have succumbed to specified crazy visions and let them submit to their policies?
Probably the key minute that this process began, and inactive took place on the old continent was the emergence of Protestantism, which put much more emphasis on the Old Testament and then emigration of its most fanatical representatives to America. In this way, the state was created, on the 1 hand, in the very heights of enlightened advancement identified with reason, realism and human rights, but whose citizens were constantly fed descriptions of the old Testament massacres carried out in God's name and maintained racial segregation in the 20th century. Euphoria and the sense of power associated with successes in fighting practically defenseless Indians, easy conquered by a rich, stunning natural and climate-friendly country gave emergence to the belief that Americans were besides dealing with a fresh promised land, and themselves are a fresh nation elected or lost tribe of Israel. All of this was much more appropriate to the spirit of the Old Testament than to Christ's "my kingdom is not of this world."
So we can talk about the strong affinity of the spirit born of akin myths and their entangled experiences. 1 of the last books to survey these phenomena E. Michael Jones It has a prominent title: “With the Bible and with a rifle. Rise, fall and return of American identity.” O.S.) Quoted by P. Lisicki conducting with the aid of state-of-the-art aircraft, rockets and tanks an extermination armed with rifles and home production of rockets of arabian residents of Palestine Prime Minister Netanyahu put it this way: "Our claim to this land is based on the largest and uncontested paper in the full created world—the Holy Bible. It was the Bible that gave us the right to this land.”
Another reason for taking over perfect power over American minds, and consequently over politics was the moral and spiritual collapse of conventional elites, which he described critically e.g. C. Wright Mills in his erstwhile popular “Elit of Power” in Poland, and the fall of which E. Todd late analysed in “The Curse of the West”. Todd, unlike Mills, pointed to affirmative aspects of the erstwhile ethos known for generations of household members briefly referred to as WASP – White, AngloSaxon Protestants. Epstein's evidence and the degree of depravity that emerges from them is the culmination of a longer process, the beginning of which dates most frequently to the years of the 1960s moral revolution. At the same time, political influences fell with moral and moral decline. The WASP lost their positions successively in finance, art, science, judicial power, until the turn came to the most prominent positions of elected democratic politicians. Characters Barack Obamabut besides Donald Trump and a large part of his crew well reflect this change, but we must remember that the policy we see is the tip of the iceberg, the change at the top of it is the consequence of long and deeper processes.
In the context of the collapse of the erstwhile elites and the decline of conventional ethos, the increase in number significance, but powerfully motivated, and not seldom even the fanaticated spiritual groups, was facilitated. Moreover, there is simply a moral and doctrinal crisis in the Catholic Church. As Mr Lisicki sums it up well: “The smaller but well organized and having its own community program is incomparably more powerful than the amorphous community, internally paralyzed.” And again there are sad analogies to the contemporary Polish society and its astonishing vulnerability to abroad manipulations, which are joined by various types of solidarity among number groups. Mr Lisicki besides devotes fragments of his book dating from the presidency Ronald Reagan a abrupt emergence in the meaning of the Chabad-Lubacz sect's racist ideas. In this light, 1 should look at the extinguishing of Hanukkah in the Polish parliament by Grzegorz Braun. Symbols and rituals are related to ideas and just as they have consequences.
Religion, politics, money, human passions have always blended in past like in a bubbling crucible. Therefore, Shakespeare's 15th century scene, in which Henry V listens to the justification of his pretensions to the French throne, and the intricate dynastic dependence extort small of this knowing warrior, having a financial interest of a Catholic nun, continues to explain politics no worse, and in many cases better than the analysis of even titled authorities and their listeners, who cannot be amazed why America is acting against logic, reason and interests of its own citizens. The fact that many Americans believe like ancient crusaders that “God wills so” inactive cannot be ignored, though swords and copies have been replaced by drones, rockets, satellites, and so far remaining atomic bombs, only Christ replaced the bloodthirsty Jehovah.
At this point it is worth noting that the postulate of a extremist break-up with the Old Testament appeared in Christianity as early as the second century C.E. in the form of the teachings of Marcyon, who, however, lost and was declared heretic. In turn the author of the motto of this article, Artur Schopenhauer, looking at religions from the outside, pointed to what all attentive listener of subsequent readings during the Holy Mass felt. It is hard to have a greater contrast than that between the Old and fresh Testament texts. The erstwhile according to the large Gdańsk is optimistic, aimed at temporal success, while Christianity shifts our hopes to a better planet beyond the earthly reality, calls for sacrifices and ascetics. That is why Christianity, and especially Catholicism according to the author of the chapter “On the Denial of the Will of Life” has much more to do with those calling for freedom from the Sansar of Buddhism and the Veda than he wanted JPII with the religion of “our older brothers in faith”.
Roman Dmowski He translated this into the reality of politics: "Unquestionably, the deep knowing and sincerity of Christian principles and the principles of the Gospel that be in Catholicism—because Protestantism has converted from the Gospel to the old Testament—does not agree with absolute national selfishness. He makes a discrimination in the fight between the nations of a just war and an unjust war, condemns the deficiency of scruples in choosing means of combat."
We're surviving in an interesting time, so possibly these questions will come back. As in Shakespeare's shadow of reflections on legal justifications, alleged real politics is going on. The action mostly triggers a reaction. In the face of specified open submission of politics to American Israel and the judaic lobby in the United States, American patriots return to matters that have been pushed distant for decades in a sack of conspiracy theories. Jeffrey Sachs recalls that he was murdered in inactive unexplained circumstances JF Kennedy He opposed Israel's acquisition of atomic weapons, and his policy sabotaged the CIA, T. Carlson asks why the files on the attack on the WTC were not released, Thomas Massie and members of the MAGA movement are talking about the AIPAC influence and do not let the Iran bomb to cover Epstein's file. From the deep shadow, possibly the substance of the national Reserve, creating money from nothing, who has a monopoly on it and why. And it'll get even more interesting.
Olaf Swolkień
photo of wikipedia
Think Poland, No. 11-12 (15-22.03.2026)
