SURVEILLANCE

If I am correct, Poland took the Presidency of the European Union in this six months. The only crucial success of the Polish Presidency was to give 2 1000 donuts to EU employees and officials.Other EU members who organize social gatherings called "cheeks" in connection with the war in Ukraine benefit from the inability of the Polish government. Even the United Kingdom, which is not a associate of the EU, organises specified a meeting, it is not known whether it is EU or Natovian.

I would like to remind you that the EU is 27 countries. It is simply a mistake for organizers to invitation only a narrow group of politicians and to ignore others whose voice, for example, Estonia has the same importance as France. The disregard of smaller partners is not a good idea, due to the fact that there is simply a strong probability that their perception of fresh events may make more sense than the foolishness spoken by politicians presenting large states. What arrangements were made in France? D.Tusk- "We realize that specified meetings do not end in decisions." Then why are we meeting?

Another "higher" in the UK has not changed much, in the further string of assurances about assistance to Ukraine and cooperation with Ukraine on the plan to end the fighting. The only interesting and in rule impossible to implement without Russia's consent is to agree that, in the future, there will be a "coalition of willing states" which, in the event of a truce in Ukraine, will defend peace and respect for this agreement. These willing states are of course NATO members. 1 of the reasons for the conflict was the desire to join NATO.Now Putin would agree to settle with NATO. I uncertainty it.

After these fewer notable and foolish declarations coming from France and the UK, Poland holding the EU Presidency should be active in the game. Poland, calling a summit of all EU countries and not just a fewer elected, should present concrete proposals as EU Presidency on truce, frost or end of war.

Propose and lead to the establishment of an EU negotiating group that will start negotiations with the disputed parties. They will perceive to their expectations of freezing or ending the conflict. They will effort to convince stakeholders to compromise on peculiarly delicate issues.And only then will they consider sending troops. Not as far as Macron and Starmer are concerned. These should be global peacekeeping forces that can only legally send the UN.

What are the benefits of making specified a decision? The Polish Presidency enters the global arena with a completely different thought without putting any organization to the preliminary conditions. Subsequent summits, assurances about armed assistance for Ukraine, patting on the back and common photographs will not solve this problem.

Prime Minister Tusk - Head of the Polish Presidency of the EU Council. Not only in the photo, which was signed by R. Gierty "Poland in the first line" but in the action we should be , due to the Polish Presidency, at least in the lead.

https://www.liil.eu/promujnotke

05.03.2025 22:00