This "Chinese peace plan" for Ukraine, if you clear it of diplomatic jargon, simply means that Beijing is determined to support Moscow in this war (against “unilateral” sanctions, etc.). For respective reasons, this is very good news:
1) The deficiency of the expected by all Russian winter offensive and full mobilization in Russia means that it is simply a war for years. Putin had a dream about Czechoslovakia ’68 a year ago and was stuck in the trenches of planet War I. It is known how the clash with the western bloc from 1914 to 1917 ended for the Tsarate, so it seems possible that Putina for a year or 2 (or earlier) will meet the destiny of Nicholas II. Only that this time the power will be taken over by not looking into the West by the Marxists modernizers, but the contemporary equivalent of the Black Sotna, or various Prigages, Dugina, Streak, etc. Even if there is simply a liberal-pro-Western intermezzo of any Medvedev or another Navalny along the way, Russia's entry into the orbit of China will cut it off from the West and its liberal anti-civilization, preventing the political stabilisation of any "neo-direction".
2) By making historical parallels, Russia for China becomes what Austro-Hungary was for Germany (with the difference that Vienna, however, was winning against Belgrade, while the Russian army cannot cope with its weaker opponent due to the fact that Putin does not want to carry out full mobilization). It remains to be hoped that in Beijing they studied European past and China will not be allowed to engage Russia in a direct war against the West, to which they are simply not ready and which they would gotta lose present and for many more years.
However, Russia's indirect support means its submission to China, as the Germans subjugated Austro-Hungary and Turkey. And this is another good news: Russia is losing its political “turnover” and will no longer stand against China at the side of the West. Xi Jinping is to be met by Aleksandr Lukashenko, which means that China will someway recreate the Mongolian "Orda"; from Bug to the east the Tributary space of Beijing will be extended, where the suzereni will most likely search the "jar" of the rulers of China and these will decide who will regulation Belarus, Moscow, Chechnya, Siberia, Central Asia, etc.
3) Ukraine has not so far attacked Russians in Transnistria, as expected yesterday. This means that the U.S. does not want to annoy China, due to the fact that it is not the Ukrainians themselves who decide in this war about their actions at strategical level, and that would be the liquidation of the Russian colony in Transnistria.
Washington I am aware that China, mastering the Russian "pivot area", is gaining a rebound to master the full large Island. Heartland does not in itself have the right possible (Words are incapable to make efficient states), but it gives specified possible to the Rimland entity – so many geopolitics classics. Therefore, the US is not taking steps to velocity up the cementation of Russia with China.
The proposal of London, Paris and Berlin of the Ukrainian-NATO Pact is simply a replay of the "Partnership for Peace", that is, the effort by Western Europeans to make peace with the losses for Russia. Thus, the European Union would aim for standardisation with Chinese "neo-Orda".
A "premural" ("Latin Civilization") in "Central and east Europe" (Ukraine, Pribaltic Republic, Poland) would be ravaged by the East (Ukraine and Pribaltic Republic) and possibly included in a centralised, ideological and bureaucratic western anti-civilisation like Hungary during the period of their reflection by the Habsburgs (Poland integrated within the EU).
In all, then, those who are to be "removed from history" ("neo-Romanov" Putin, Nędzymorze), will be deleted, Genghis-chan's legacy may be renewed. (with the amendment that this time on the side of “Ordy” is besides Iran and possibly besides Arabia – so, it's like Genghis-chan and Tamerlan at 1 time and in 1 geopolitical block).
Ronald Lasecki
