The parent of a kid who suffered from a compulsory vaccine "has no legal interest" to request an investigation into the falsified formulation," stated the ultimate Administrative Court. He dismissed the cassation action against the 2024 provincial court sentence. respective years of proceedings proved that, according to the authorities to uphold the law, pharmaceutical companies can unpunished Polish children with pseudomedical experiments.
The case was described in social media by Arkadiusz Tetel's attorney, the victim's attorney.
After taking an injection in the compulsory vaccination directory (2017), the kid has had an adverse vaccine reaction (NOP). An independent laboratory survey commissioned by the household showed a large difference between the composition of the preparation declared by the maker and the fact. For example, the aluminium content was to be 0.82 mg, the survey showed 1.97 mg and the acceptable value was set in Poland at 1.25 mg.
The Chief Pharmaceutical Inspectorate was informed of the case, but refused to initiate proceedings which would explain the discrepancies. In doing so, he cited the studies submitted by the maker for another product series. The case went to the Provincial Administrative Court in 2020, which took care of it... 4 years later.
The applicant pointed out in the appeal against the plaintiff’s adverse judgement of the WSA that the case file did not include the results of the investigation presented by the maker in Poland of the series of preparations or its ‘family tree’. As the injured party’s typical wrote, “it is so unknown on the basis of which papers the [WSA] authority actually issued its decision”.
On Wednesday, the Chief Administrative Court dismissed the cassation complaint.
"It can be said that the thesis of the NSA ruling is: Vaccinations are safe, but we won't check it unless the maker asks.“He commented on the verdict of Advocate Tetel. ‘In practice, this means that a kid covered by a compulsory vaccination calendar who has had complications after vaccination has not obtained the right to clarify whether the preparation was correct as to its composition. According to the Authority, only the maker can initiate this procedure," he added.
As the lawyer pointed out, the essence of the ultimate Administrative Court judgement in Poland is that the parent of the injured kid "has no legal interest" in the requests to initiate the investigation, as specified must be initiated ex officio.
"It is the surrender of bodies appointed to defend citizens, including the weakest and vulnerable. The State cannot first impose an work to give the kid a medical product and then claim that the parent of this kid has no legal interest in demanding an examination of its composition. This case is another strong argument in favour of undermining the work to vaccinate before the Constitutional Tribunal" - concluded Arkadiusz Tetel.
Source: Facebook
RoM
