Center of Life and Family: Lies and Manipulations on Early Porn Pills

Well, supporters of the introduction of emergency contraception measures without a prescription say that these preparations do not work prematurely, but only prevent pregnancy. And you gotta admit, in a tricky way they're telling the truth.

Firstly, due to the fact that in fact specified a pill is based on 2 ‘security’ mechanisms and its operation is partially dependent on the minute of the monthly cycle.

- I'm sorry. The first mode of action is to hold ovulation, so that male and female reproductive cells do not have a chance to meet and of course there is no fertilization.

- I'm sorry. The second way is to change the properties of endometrium, i.e. the lining of the uterus, so that the already fertilized egg cannot nest in it – and is consequently expelled from the body. So we're dealing with miscarriage..

And that's where we get to the bottom of it. For supporters of this form of “anticonception” is not abortion because... there is not yet a pregnancy!

According to the WHO definition, changed to this form more than 30 years ago, pregnancy starts only erstwhile the embryo nests in the endometrium.

You will admit that this is simply a very clever procedure – separating the concept of pregnancy from the actual beginning of human life. Clever, yet cruel, due to the fact that by specified rhetoric many women will believe that taking a ‘day after’ pill, they usage only 1 form of contraception, while in fact they execute early abortion.

This is precisely what the Donald Tusk government wants to do. As shortly as possible!

The Prime Minister announced a fewer weeks ago that he wanted the birth control after intercourse to be available again without a prescription in Poland.

This bill is very simple due to the fact that it changes 1 short record. I hope that at the phase of the parliamentary work there will be no objection or obstruction or attempts to veto this bill due to the fact that it seems that this drug should be widely available Donald Tusk informed.

Of course, the situation is not ideal, due to the fact that the pill “day after” is available in pharmacies.

And while feminists proceed to convince themselves that the request to get a prescription for specified a measurement is an absolute scandal, due to the fact that it prolongs the time for taking a tablet, that it is costly and that women are “complex” in having to ask for specified measures, the prescription is simply a minimum safeguard against at least another dangerous effect of receiving post-coital contraception.

Because, of course, the top danger is the anticipation of abortion, and thus the death of an already conceived child, these preparations are not safe for women who accept them.

But again— The effects of taking specified a tablet are said to be small and reluctant.

Meanwhile, hormonal disruption, especially in girls, can have serious consequences for their wellness in the future.

Side effects of the ‘day after’ pill include menstrual cycle disorders, vaginitis, rupture of ovarian cysts or pathological bleeding from the uterus. It besides importantly increases the hazard of ectopic pregnancy. Moreover, like another hormonal preparations, contraception after intercourse can seriously harm the liver.

And for a reason I compose about girls – coalition politicians want the pill “day after” to be available without a prescription for a 15-year-old!

I don't request to convince you of how disastrous this decision can be.

On the 1 hand, it is possible wellness problems, and on the another hand it is simply a kind of incentive for specified young people to engage in sexual activity (as in another words to call the introduction of further facilitations in this sphere, alternatively of learning work and instilling a clean attitude in the context of sexuality).

There is another argument: this besides removing the anticipation for parents to take full care of their children.

Because that's actually the situation where a teenager can buy behind her parents' back a drug with possible early-porn action. Look at the absurdities this change will lead to: a 15-year-old cannot go to a doctor herself, for example, to receive a prescription for hormonal contraception, but alternatively she will be able to just go to a pharmacy and buy an “accidental contraception”, with a much stronger and more dangerous effect!

But these lies, manipulations and maiming of people with slogans about "women's rights" is nothing new. The government of Donald Tusk, although he has late held the helm of power, has already shown that the introduction of a full-scale cultural revolution in Poland is his absolute priority.

And it does not number with anyone or anything: neither with the Constitution that this environment has late had on banners, nor with the laws, nor with the welfare of children or women's health. All of this, as we hear, is the essential sacrifices.

However, this decision of Donald Tusk raised considerable controversy. Discussing whether it is simply a good thought to make available to teenagers the means of specified action that they can take without any control, is simply a good idea, heated in the media. Which is happy – there was besides opposition from the pro-life organization.

The petition addressed to parliamentarians and the president was sent by the Ordo Iuris Institute. The authors stress that the legality of the trade in products with a possible early-poron effect would be contrary to the Polish Constitution, and besides indicate a number of dangerous consequences for women's health.

Greetings.

Paul Decoration, Center for Life and Family