Beware of people who have only read 1 book years ago, Saint Thomas of Aquinas utilized to say.
ZThis gate means the current guide for each latitude – beware of people who know what it is and who are impervious to even the most rational arguments. Moreover, specified an individual (as well as a individual or a person) considers his view to be absolute, and all effort to criticize is treated exclusively in terms of an attack directed at himself. For it is impossible to discuss facts, and these are in possession of specified an individual(~a girl or ~a girl).
And although we know behind Kant that there is no nonsubjective reality that would not be a projection of the ruling entity (noumens, or things themselves are not available to us), which means that the dispute concerns only our own concepts which are the consequence of the reality of intellectual and cultural filters, but those who know will think that they are available to the undisputable truth. bare truth, or alternatively bare noumen. But reality is much more fun than it may have seemed from the above introduction.
62 years ago writer-philosopher Stanislaw Lem in Summa technologies noted:
People are convinced that noble heads of nonsense can't tell. Well, they can. And the bigger the heads are.
Great Polish philosopher Henry Elzenberg explained this phenomenon:
The most intelligent people have the stupidest ideas; their head is restless, in constant motion, so it inactive stumbles. Fools don't have stupid ideas.
So much for admission. Let's get to the point.
Pan zetjot noted a certain regulation that he thought existed:
I bet thesis, based on reflection of "discussion" in s24 or incorrect, that There was complete irrationalism generated by liberalism, which rejected the criterion of truth And now you're going to stone your soul, hell is gone. By the way, it's worth noting that the individual, in this case, commentator or blogger, is, in specified a situation, acting on its own, completely helpless and doomed, if he does not control himself strongly, to plaiting nonsense. The story of an all-powerful, rational individual has fallen.
Let's start at the end. Zetjot states openly:
...the individual, in this case, the commentator or blogger, is, in specified a situation, acting on his own, completely helpless and doomed, if he does not control himself strongly, to plaiting nonsense.
For apparent reasons these words match verses of the large poet of revolutionary Russia Vladimir Majakowski. He wrote likewise in a poem devoted to the Revolutionary Leader:
Unit - zero, unit - nonsense,
alone – it will not decision a five-inch log,
Even if it's a large figure.
Similarly, the blogger/commentator in Ztjota cannot act on his own. Which is what? Must it belong to at least “strong in number” or to any Moscow-based hatred stable?
It's a joke, of course. In fact, the point is that the blogger/commentator senses the right line and remains on the basis, as was said during seemingly not rather the past system. So he's going with the herd.
AThis base, defined above, was threatened by liberalism. As this self-appointed guardian of the orthodoxy of thoughts writes - There was a complete irrationalism generated by liberalism, which rejected the criterion of truth, and now hoard the soul, hell is gone.
That's interesting. Well, our truthful and rational blogger states the most crucial requirement:
The portal serves, theoretically, the exchange of information. The essential criterion is the veracity of this information. So the author must, in the end, appeal to science, without learning is only ble, ble, ble.
So fortunately, Zetjot gave instructions on the place to another blogger recommending him to read the technological image of the world.
The book that represents the actual revelation of planet past according to this blogger is named The birth of everything. A fresh past of Humanityand by David Graeber and David Wengrov (Polish edition 2023). The main explanation behind the authors is... the modern failure of freedom available to the Ancients.
Allegedly, we lost:
- freedom to leave
- freedom to disobey
- freedom to form social relations.
Moreover, the authors argue that ancient societies have consciously experimented... with social models.
On the basis of respective archaeological discoveries, they put another thesis, much more literary than scientific. Well, they say in the abandoned 11th century Teotihuacan There was a revolution in which satrapia was replaced by libertarian democracy.
The improvement and functioning of the city of the modern size of Częstochowa were to be decided district councils and vicinity Meetings. Anyone who attended the gathering at least erstwhile in their life Housing community He knows it's impossible. In the meantime, according to the authors, the name of the construction of nearly 2,000 buildings...
Generally, this is the conclusion desired by all Mentzen and Libertarian followers – that is why You can live without authority and we can do it again.
Not long ago specified an experimentation was attempted to implement in Europe and Asia. Military and labour councils They functioned in Russia, Germany, Hungary and even... China. As we remember, it ended with 100 million victims.
Teotihuacan didn't last long either...
NAnd the funniest thing about it is something else.
Zetjot presents himself as a zealous believer in evolution, ready for quite a few our behaviour and abilities to be packed into genes. He missed the most crucial part.
Because in fact Graeber and Wengrov are to any extent... anti-evolutionary.
Look at this.
The majority of people and scientists believe that the improvement of humanity was evolutionary.
It was written by a GPS blogger, and evolution itself called... the work of Christian civilization.
But authors The birth of everything... Human improvement is considered nonlinear. Moreover, her surviving co-author David Wengrow in an interview with Stanisław Wryk (Interia, September 23, 2023) said explicitly:
- I'm sorry. Nothing has changed about our intellectual skills in the last 2 100 1000 years. Scientists agree here. This is simply a key issue, due to the fact that we can imagine that both 200,000 years ago and 100,000 years ago 2 people could sit next to each another and have the same conversation that we're having now.
]]>https://weeks.interia.pl/weeks/news-they called-how-we-a-ich-mozg-di...]]>
Instead of evolution, we only have technology!
The comic thing, however, is that Wengrov does not hide the ideological message of this position. At the end of this interview, he states:
Our book doesn't tell us where we're going, but it says that you can drop your shackles, cut off your balls and be free. Then you can look around and start looking for another solutions. It's not the same as suggesting a circumstantial action. The point is to free your imagination, due to the fact that we are prisoners of our own minds, evil theories unsupported by any evidence.
op. cit.
So what is it, Mr. Ztjot? You're calling for people to start reading.
It's purely sociotechnical. Mr. David's book is simply besides extended (700 pages), and it besides jumps off the subject of the subject according to the unknown even the authors of the key. 😉
I bet dollars against nuts that even a man with an IQ far above average will quit reading the top after going through the first 50 pages. Besides, the circulation was alternatively poor.
You are utilizing an highly vile eristic grasp against the interlocutor – you are sending him back to a position that is, in fact, a weak ideological manifesto, badly written and hard to reach, in conclusion, to call him a failure, since he does not know specified basic sources.
Taka attitude causes any bloggers who do not deal with technological methodology rather a bit of applause.
But you can number on complete disregard among the people who make the science; at best, for designation as fools.
Because what makes advancement is simply a deficiency of respect for authority.
As the top contemporary Polish poet wrote:
You always swim to the sources, against the current. There's garbage flowing.
If you don't understand, I'll say more easily:
- I'll go on as long as I don't get stuck as part of my Master's ongis.
Otherwise, I'm doomed to stagnation. Or I could be a teacher.
I presume that you remember not rather the past times, erstwhile practically all argument (especially the doctoral work) contained a small confusion with the current leading Marxist-Leninist (gensek KC KPZS).
And yet you do precisely the same.
The trash screen you're trying to introduce is just smoke. Fortunately, alternatively of dazzling others, you're making yourself cough.
You should callback the opinion of Lieutenant Dub...
How he suits the gentleman. 😉
23.08 2026
