Is the existence of BRICS+ beneficial for our homeland, beginning a fresh geopolitical space and, consequently, fresh opportunities for action and political games? Breaking out of a land between East and West? Or is she a serious threat? If so, what?
Dr. Robert Kościelny
"The Indian Express" pened by Ajay Behera, prof. of MMAJ global Studies Academy in fresh Delhi, explains to readers that BRICS is "a platform for countries for which there was no place at the negotiating table erstwhile shaping the postwar planet order". The United States and its allies have built a network of institutions specified as the IMF, the planet Bank and the WTO that reflect their values and priorities. The introduced order was based on the free market, democracy and, above all, the dominance of the US dollar in global finances. It served the interests of the West, but not necessarily the remainder of the world, which is now asking the question – why would the strategy created in 1945 proceed to specify the 21st century principles?
Why is UZBEKISTAN an investment hit 2025? Longitude: ‘There are millions made’ | K. Krupa
For a long time, emerging powers specified as Brazil, China, India and South Africa have mostly accepted this situation. However, with the changes in the global economical landscape, these countries have begun to competition the arrangement that has lasted for many decades. BRICS is the most visible form of this discontent with the existing position quo. "BRICS quietly changes any of the rules of global policy. From dedollarisation to alternate improvement models, it is increasingly positioned as an opponent of the liberal global order under Western leadership." Beher's text was besides posted on the InfoBRICS portal, a common website of the BRICS Ministry of abroad Affairs.
When in January 2025. Indonesia became a tenth associate of the block, 9 another countries were officially regarded as "partner countries", and about 20 were invited to join the organization (for example Saudi Arabia) or expressed interest (for example Turkey), at the time "BRICS states, including Russia, advertised the expansion of the group as a landmark moment, announcing the arrival of the post-Western order of the world, in which the >global majority< yet gain power" – said Carnegie Endowment analysts, think tank classified among the world's top few.
Does this mean that BRICS+ is becoming a powerful device that will shortly decision (or possibly already has) to conquer America and all over the West? Not at all. At least judging by the information in InfoBRICS. This portal, after this year’s BRICS summit in Brazil (July 2025), commented: “It is not about destroying the West. The aim is to make area for the remainder [...] if the global order turns out to be unfair, countries will strive to make fresh institutions. This is what BRICS does, building alternatives to systems managed by the West, not through war, but through investments, banking and trade." From the remainder of this text, we will learn that BRICS undermines the thesis that Western liberal democracy is the only right model of progress. As she besides believes that there are many ways of improvement and that the West has no right to teach the remainder of the planet what is good and what is bad for her.
According to many analysts, so far everything revolves around gestures, symbols and declarations. Dr. Andrew G. Ross, lecturer in global business and business strategy at Dundee University, believes that the organisation of an yearly BRICS summit symbolically sends a signal to the West, and especially to the G7 countries, that they no longer have a monopoly on controlling the global agenda favoring their marketplace economy and financial systems.
However, there are no concrete moves that can force the West and the US to narrow down their global ambitions and give way to another solutions. And I don't think anything like that's going to happen soon, due to the fact that the BRICS structure is weakening the conflicting interests of the countries that make it up.
Carnegie Endowment (CE) reiterates the fact that the BRICS associate States, as well as the partner and aspiring countries, stay divided on their commitment to relations with the United States. "Some countries want to keep a affirmative relation with the United States, although they welcome the arrival of a more egalitarian planet system. Others, including Russia [as well as China], search to position BRICS as a block rivaling the US-dominated West," says CE analysis.
Palade: Tusk SENSED in Washington?! Sikorski's time is coming?
This is not the only discrepancy. There's more. Dr. Cedric de Coning, prof. at the Norwegian Institute of global Affairs, recalls that China and India are geopolitical rivals in South Asia. Egypt and Ethiopia have a fierce dispute over the Nile. South African president explained that his country remains unattached in the dispute between the West and Russia or China. For many countries, membership of BRICS does not mean that 1 global alliance can take sides against another, but it is an chance to work together in a group focused on a number of common interests. Thus, "Many Western countries and BRICS members may have more common interests than the catastrophic headlines of newspapers suggest", promising the arrival of another Cold War. Therefore, it is worth considering cooperation in areas where there are common interests alternatively than assuming that BRICS and the West are strategical rivals on all fronts.
Dr Andrew G. Ross adds that BRICS is an eclectic mix of various political, economical and cultural systems, which makes it importantly hard to scope a common position on a fresh global governance system. In this respect, the West is more uniform.
Anjali V. Bhatt, communication manager of the Peterson Institute for global Economics and the technological staff of that institution, points out that the inability to agree on the directions of action made it hard to accomplish declared economical objectives, specified as the creation of payment and currency systems to avoid the dollar. There is even more basic tension that we mentioned earlier: for Russia and China the motivation is to want something clearly anti- or at least post-west. another countries see differently. India, South Africa and Brazil would like to improvement the western order from within. "BRICS is not against anyone," tweeted Brazilian president Luiz da Silva. This fundamental tension between the confrontational, without a tiny anti-Western attitude, and an attitude wishing to slow improvement of Western institutions, limited the BRICS' ability to formulate core business assumptions. At the same time, it created a platform for Western cooperation with some, at least, members of the block, as Dr. Cedric de Coning mentioned.
How the mechanics of Populism works and why Populism grows?
However, it should be remembered that what this text deals with is in the statue of nascendi. For example, we do not know how India will behave after the 50 percent taxation on goods imposed on it by America as sanctions for buying oil from Russia. It may be assumed that they will be radicalized, as Trump's fresh words might indicate: "It seems that we have lost India and Russia to the darkest, darkest China."
John Mearsheimer, an American political scientist, the creator of offensive realism theory, a lecturer in political sciences at the University of Chicago, an outstanding figure among geopolitics, wrote on X: “BRICS countries are not against the West! They take care of their own interests and development. They are not at war with the West or any another country." prof. Mearsheimer's view seems to be in line with what the BRICS abroad Ministers' portal presents, although this is most likely an accidental convergence.
Is the existence of BRICS+ beneficial for our homeland, beginning a fresh geopolitical space and, consequently, fresh opportunities for action and political games? Breaking out of a land between East and West? Or is she a serious threat? If so, what?
![W powiecie bialskim ruszyła operacja „TOR” [ZDJĘCIA]](https://static2.slowopodlasia.pl/data/articles/xga-4x3-w-powiecie-bialskim-ruszyla-operacja-tor-zdjecia-1764061194.jpg)