Editorial:The text listed below comes from the pre-war “The Knight of the Immaculate” – from September 1938. Monthly created by O. Maximilian Maria Kolbego he was in the Twentieth Interwar Age for the most read magazine. At the highest of its circulation, it reached 800,000 copies. Not only religious, but besides social, political, and economic. Invaluable are the accounts of the Masonic revolution in Mexico, of the civilian war in Spain, or the publicist who warms Poles to believe in triumph and fortitude of the spirit just before German aggression in 1939 (from today's position seems rather naive, if you know the further tragic destiny of Poland).
But he besides fought tirelessly “The Knight of the Immaculate” with socialism in all its forms. He clearly showed that the strategy was not compatible with Catholicism and that it was harmful in all dimension. What a direct language he operated on, without wrapping it in cotton, it could be colloquially said – "He struck right in the eye!" It's not the same as today's Catholic publicist, full of clichés, sterile gibberish – just to not offend anyone... Besides, what's to expect, since the church hierarchy after Vaticanum Secundum, rather profoundly soaked in the socialist-Masonic poison that destroys its structure until today.
The article published below concerns the issue of abortion, living, besides in contemporary Poland. It is worth reading due to the fact that it approaches the problem from a completely different, very unusual, original, page. We are fortunate that we have access to any copies of the pre-war Knight, so we will effort to share with you the selected texts, especially those relating to socio-political issues.
Although “The Knight of the Immaculate” had achieved pre-war expenditures, for present-day space, it is not easy to find its old editions. The windstorm has done its job, the remainder makes time... Maybe there are old copies of the pre-war Knight in your homes? possibly you have another old Polish Catholic magazines and not just those? possibly you've got them hanging around, throwing them out of the corner, destroying them, and yet getting into a dumpster, or in a furnace? If this is the case, delight send PROKAPA (available at the bottom of the footer) to our archive.. More interesting material will be published on the website.
Meanwhile, we invitation you to read (original spelling)...
* * Oh, * *
To defend the lives of infants
‘Progressive” parents... kill children
It was never in Poland. What? – There was no “fashion” for parents to... kill their children, and so to be called “progressive” parents...
Do “progress” parents kill their adult children? No, adults couldn't kill themselves. And for that, he's facing punishment, prison. inactive “not accepted” – kill an adult child. The same is not yet “in fashion” to kill a kid who has already been born. Yes, all parent seeks for this kid the most beautiful cart, even for the last penny, though for the money borrowed, for installments, “not to be worse than the others” to drive the kid with a pump. He seeks peculiar covers, fur coats, coats, coats, shoes, snowmobiles, raindrops, balls, dolls, horses, toys, bolted and unwinded, etc., etc. frequently parents themselves do not have what their teenage comfort has. And later, as he grows up, how he cares about specified a child: school for school, clothes, outfits, sports, fun, and – to have a job, a job, and – to get married, he married richly.
One might say that specified care for children as present has never been shown by parents. But it's just a look. due to the fact that that's how parents care about "progress" only one, at most 2 children, one, 2 who were born, due to the fact that the another (their) children, by the will of the same parents, are deprived of life... execution without pity before they are born. One, 2 – they fondle, entertain, dress, educate, shepherd, shepherd, property, prepare them, and the others – five, ten, sixteen – conviction them to a terrible death without baptism, without a cross, without burial, without a coffin, without a small heart.
What does a “fashionable” parent do?
What is simply a “progressive” parent doing today? erstwhile she learns that she has become a mother, she begins to think first of all how to prevent a kid from always seeing God’s world. Of course, all the neighbors around the council as they can: 1 old way, another fresh one, advise – poison, at the same time indicating what, when, and how, and yet others, the youngest, the "fashioniest" and the "progressive" simply advise as shortly as possible – go to the doctor and tell him to slaughter alive. The parent hesitates a while, especially erstwhile this first child, a compatible choir of friends slow convinces her:
– Now they all do!
– Only stupid kids now!
– Not fashion for kids, not these days!
– You're not gonna die from this!
– For 1 forty gold will you get free of the trouble?!
– You'll be home in 3 days, healthy as a fish! I've been like 10 times! Nowhere, for 1 day you’ll “get laid”: these are the ways doctors now have!
– If you don't make yourself do surgery now, then you'll gotta have a baby, and then if the insurance company gives you a hospital, you'll have a doctor from them.
The “mother” is no longer “wake”. Even erstwhile she went to the hospital, she was embarrassed to see if individual here would make her feel bad. But the nurses – nothing, doctors – nothing, and the remainder calmed down erstwhile she was greeted by a group of young, healthy women who came for the same purpose! Only 1 baby was born somewhere. The “mother” saw that 1 by 1 they came to convince her and taught her what to do so that she would not give birth again.
The turn came and on our “fashionable” mother: her kid was massacred, pieces of moving paper were placed, and they were put in a coffin of any kind, which was just lying in a morgue.
And no more did the “fashion” parent of her firstborn child... She was in the infirmary 5 more times. From now on, she advised the same tirelessly 5 another neighbors. After 10 years, she yet has a daughter. It blows and it blows. He caresses, dresses in more and more kuse and more fancy dresses. She dreams of getting married and how happy she will be erstwhile she's old. Simultaneously those six They cry day and night and cry for all eternity—for vengeance to God on their terrible mother... Or a parent like that – a coffin to be happy? Is she gonna be the only 1 left alive with her swindled daughter? Will she be able to know how many brothers and sisters she truly had? Will he find out which dogs caused their bodies to eat and on which paths their ankles...?
Ba, how about a daughter after her mother? Perhaps, then, in the same "fashionable" way, she will save her "pane honor" in the event of the collapse? Then the “fashionable” girl will accompany to the wedding with a crowd of entertained guests and a happy fiancé—the spectrum of first-born corpses who will never see the light of God as unbaptized perish. How many “progressive” virgins, erstwhile they get married, how many small ones of their dead bodies have been sick crying for vengeance to God?
We're missing someone...
They say present is bad due to the fact that there are besides many people. In the meantime, people are not adequate due to the fact that the deficiency of these most crucial people... I'm certain the planet would look different if there were all those people on it who should live here with us. After all, so much deficiency of each of us – man. Good workers present deficiency a good industrialist. A good industrialist lacks good workers. Good lady, no good servant. Good servants deficiency a good lady. Are our sons not lacking a good friend? – our daughter a good friend? Where to turn, where there is no 1 else... so seldom can you meet the desired, real one. human. There are people, no man, and that he's not so bad... There are fewer self-sacrifices, fewer honest wives, no loving children, besides fewer honest officials, holy inventors, holy artists, holy scholars, holy monarchs.
Where are they all?
They were expected to be, and they would be, but it was the mothers who didn't see the world. So in the world, with us, there was a crucial percent of those whose parents were willing to leave. And who knows if it doesn't happen that the “fashionable” parents let the worst of the children they were meant to have come into the world. And that's the kind of kid in all family. They're called germs. Who knows if we are not surviving in the “world of embryos”? due to the fact that present people learn, educate, organize as never, little stupid, dark, and more wise, educated and yet so badly...
We live among the... germs.
“The planet of embryos” is very akin to hell. Nothing good can be done in hell, due to the fact that man is no longer supported by God's grace, and in the “world of births” there is above all no designation and aid from men erstwhile surviving honestly in marriage. There were ridicules and ridicules everywhere: “Why were you so stupid that you had children? Why were you so stupid to have a wife?’ Who cares in Poland that individual lives honestly in marriage? any priests approve, most likely no 1 else. But praise for conscience is not enough: where is the aid of government, society?
Are not social relations degenerative, allowing any to have thousands on the street, and many children leave unattended?
Isn't a “fashionable” girl who can't image herself, like a wife, but with 1 kid and what else she doesn't want to hear?
Is it not degenerous to live a female educated erstwhile a wife who walks down the street on a rich leash of a fat dog – alternatively of a bunch of children? And in this lady, as in the rainbow, there are increasing gatherings of wives of our peasants and workers.
That is why Poland is threatened with depopulation, with no troops, so we are being born little and more and more, but no 1 is watching these children, due to the fact that hundreds of thousands a year are being slaughtered secretly before they see the world!
And while killing children, being alive was easier, life is getting harder and harder... In addition, we and the full planet anticipate the most horrible slaughter of war, of planet war, where arrows, gases and pestilence are to be destroyed by nations. possibly that's the punishment for the baby slaughter.
There are no people in the planet who should be, so there is no 1 in the planet that should be. And there can be no decisive change for the better, where:
1) parents will execution children, so far 2) governments of states will not be surrounded by the care of marriages with many children by law, by taxes, reliefs and assistance, by orders to support the household in art, literature, press and school, and as far as we are afraid – until Poland is simply a state of moral Christian families.
Walenty Majdanski
The article was published in the monthly magazine “The Knight of the Immaculate” No. 9 (201), September 1938. first title: ‘To defend the lives of infantsIt’s okay. ”