In order for the tradition to be done, in the course of the creation of this peculiar wall of text, it could not be possible to do without “pice martyrdom”. Well, with this wall of text it was that although the content was more or little grasped in my head, it was erstwhile it came to the title itself (originally to be “the brownness of our age”) and the introduction, I had a failure of yield. erstwhile I reached the point where the introduction had almost 2 sides and consisted of many insignificant introductions (i.e. specified an introduction), I felt that it was essential to deal with it differently. General remark. There will be any sources in this wall of text, but there will be just as much anecdotal evidence.
So I'm going to start by saying that as a millenniumer (I mean the part that grew up in the "Najntis") we have developed "generous" amnesia. There is no another way to explain the consequence of 1 of the polls. As part of this survey, Poles were asked about the attitude towards self-proclaimed “border defenders”, and it turned out that the most supporters of these border drives were in 2 70+ and (werble) 30-49 years. Unfortunately, even at sources (so in Rzepa) it is not known how advanced this post was, due to the fact that 1 part of the survey was not shown on the chart.
And okay, I might have inclined to explain: well, this poll did IBRIS, and we all know what polls this IBRIS is going out, but unfortunately, I know besides many of my peers (and people born around my yearbook) to be delusional that possibly this time IBRIS was IBRIS again. Although it is simply a small amazing that in the age scope of 50-59 the poll did not choice up virtually any (decisive) ROG fan.
Let's rephrase what I wrote above. At the utmost right-wing organization came to the conclusion that, for example, stopping random cars and searching them is simply a full of ok (I am genuinely curious if specified people are so ‘convinced’ that they would let ROGowers to search their car or be outraged due to the fact that they are white, so what is it all about). Let us add to this the message by Krzysztof Bosak, who in early July (so erstwhile the ROG was the loudest) stated that he thought: "citizens' format needs to be given any powers". erstwhile translating from Bosakov into Polish: the aim was that what these border militias were doing should be legalized (and that is permanent).
Before I begin to abuse this peculiar statement, I will let myself to take a long journey down the memory lane in the performance of a shithole who perfectly remembers what the late 1990s looked like in Poland (and the beginning of the 21st century). And it looked very bad, even if we consider authoritative statistic (which, if I effort to show, can be shoved up my ass).
In general, with these najntis, it was that erstwhile individual was surviving and increasing up, for specified a individual what was happening then was average (which should not be surprising, due to the fact that it could not be compared to “other times”). It took me a small (actually a long time) before I realized that if I were to sum up with 1 word these unfortunate 1990s, that word would be "violence" which was from hell.
As a part of the interesting thing, I can mention that in 2011 TVN Attention leaned over my hometown and produced an episode entitled "Tarnobrzeg, city of juvenile delinquents"I was a small caught up in the bias of this material. I encourage you to get to know it (link in the sources will be) so that you can full appreciate how much you can effort to scare the recipient. Although the material was besides of considerable information value, 1 could learn from it, among another things, that erstwhile it comes to monitoring in TBG, it only works theoretically (the spokesperson of the Provincial Police in Rzeszów spoke on this subject). I besides remember a humorous theme. The then president (Norbert Mastalerz) most likely on his blog lamented that he had been producing for almost an hr in conversation with the people of TVN, and yet no of it was included in the material (which was not so unusual in fact, due to the fact that the president tended to pour water and say nothing about it). The chronicle work to mention that the starting point for this program was beating (with fatal outcome), and the remainder had already been earned.
All right, but it was 2011, and we were talking about violence. Let me describe any of the situations (the selection will be sharp, due to the fact that if I wanted to describe it in item [and we are talking about the situations that I witnessed, so I do not repeat rumors to you here), it would be a large book, which would most likely be considered a SF.
I utilized to go to SP 10 in Tarnobrzeg. The school was rather large, and so there were quite a few kids in it (if I remember correctly we had 8 or 9 classes on the yearbook, and there were 30+ children in each class). As you can imagine, not all the kids were polite.
We had Sigmund's yearbook. Sigismund was the kind of man who could get punched in the face for being next to him and almost everyone was afraid of him. It was not even that it was large (although it was more massive than the average typical of its yearbook), but that it could "fire" virtually in a fraction of a second. No trashtalk, no scaring, he just fired up and started beating whoever the probability bill put next to him there. I don't know what's going on with Sigmund now, but about 10 years ago he ended up in jail for alimony (although it was most likely not his first stay at this retreat shrine). Did Sigmund have any problems at school due to his behavior? No way.
We had it in Luke's class. Luke was not large, but he had colleagues who were much older and much stronger. Luke knew precisely who he could beat and who he could not (for example, he has even bigger friends). In Luke’s case, the school realized that something was wrong, but the highest punishment for his behaviour was sending him to another class. Luke was then a regular criminal agent.
It's a "scan" Luke was so interesting that he had already been thrown into a class where children were gathered “with problems”. Because, you know, alternatively of taking care of them and trying to aid them somehow, they just got them together in 1 place. For balance, any "normals" were put in there. Luke was very fond and oppressed of 1 specified normality. erstwhile the parents of this normala asked the educator to deal with this issue somehow, and to do so in a discreet way (so that their comfort would not have major problems), the educator did so discreetly that she raised it in front of the full class (and that is why I found out about it at all). This “normal” was so fortunate that the teacher did not tell her that she had learned about the full substance from the parents of normals (and so Luke then found another average to torment, just in case).
We had Tomek at school (older than me, but I don't remember if, due to the fact that he happened to winter in class and I don't remember or only once). Tom wasn't all right, and he liked beating up kids. Fartually, Tom didn't frequently go to school, so he didn't get much to beat up.
We had another Sigmund in school who had siblings. Sigismund came from a pathological household and it was already a kind of pathology that could be seen in the first period of "Peacemaker". Well, Sigismund’s father encouraged his sons to fight at home. With this Sigismund and his siblings, it was safe adequate that unlike the above, they did not beat random people.
But that's what the kids in my class, Patrick, Mariusz and previously mentioned Luke did. Well, that trio erstwhile beat a kid younger than us. Why? I don't know, and they themselves were incapable to give a reason erstwhile they were being run over by a teacher. This was 1 of the fewer situations in which the victim’s parents reacted and the school had to respond in any way. The chronicle work to mention that the "reaction" looked like they got attention and not even reduced their behaviour.
At our school, it was so interesting that erstwhile peers locked a colleague in a locker and left him there for the full lesson, the teacher who taught the lesson did not announcement that the student who had previously been present in the class had now abruptly dematerialized, and under the hall his backpack lay.
The fact that “behind the school” came to a bit of regular execution is most likely not necessary, due to the fact that it is alternatively obvious.
Now ask yourselves, what would you do if this were the case in the school where your children attend? I know I'd take my consolation from a school like this as shortly as I could. The fact is that all of the situations described by me should have been "finished" in the baguettes. 1 thing I'm going to make clear here. erstwhile I wrote about "beating" I did not mean a situation in which individual hit individual and everyone then parted into their activities. I mean beatings that left visible traces (which were traces of pedagogues, but any parents besides didn't give a shit).
At this point it would be possible to compose “such were the times” and it would be rather right, due to the fact that even erstwhile the parent reacted to the fact that something bad was happening, the school practically did nothing with this knowledge. And I'm sorry, for the sake of our safety from the 5th grade, we had to walk around school with IDs. Did it translate into anything? I don't think I gotta answer that question. So if no 1 reacted, it's hard to blame the kids for treating specified behaviour as normal.
Incidentally, only after writing the above did I remember that it was equally cheerful in the zero. As far as my group is concerned, from what I remember, we had: 1 busted nose, 1 black eye and 1 broken head (it ended with a regular tumor). No 1 cared about it, and no 1 suffered any consequences.
I wouldn't want to be misunderstood. I am well aware that force did not end in the early 21st century. To this kind of “friends” (I don't know if that's the right term, but no another 1 comes to my head better) inactive happens in schools. but even if it is, it's on a smaller scale. Besides, these situations are no longer considered average in schools. There will most likely be exceptions, but then there would be an exception to a situation in which the educator would respond to a violent situation in a way another than “put your hand on the agreement”, or he screwed up both students due to the fact that he may have jumped after another, but both were in a fight, so they were both equally guilty. Yes, at the time, for example, there was no specified thing as cyber-bullying, which present the school is doing as well as then with “ordinary” violence, but that is more than that.
Someone could say, well, possibly you were just unlucky, face, and you went to a school like that, not another school. And I couldn't truly argue with that argument due to the fact that I don't know what it looked like in another schools (for apparent reasons). On the another hand, I know what it looked like to be outside the school. due to the fact that erstwhile you went to advanced school and started spending more time “outside” (because the older man, he was already going to further parts of the city), it turned out that my school was not unique. However, I might put it another way: if my school was special, seemingly any young people materialized in Tarnobrzeg at the age that I would put it this way “school-average”.
Attention! An article sponsored by Sovereign!
https://patronite.pl/Piknik-on-country-g%C5%82upoty
That's 1 thing. I didn't spend much time studying, and I liked hanging out with my buddies. I bet that if individual was driving a more book-home life, then he most likely had different experiences, due to the fact that specified a lifestyle meant little interaction of "evening" and that meant little hazard of encountering "normality". As part of this wandering around the city, man learned very rapidly what streets, places and people should be avoided. It can be said that we had specified a micro "no-go zone". You know, the kind of places the police didn't go to, although with this police, sometimes even erstwhile they went somewhere, it was different with interventions.
Imagine that. We're sitting with our friends on "Red" (i.e. on the main Tarnobrzeg market). On the other side of the square, a group sits politely on the bench and is delirious with alcohol. A police car approaches this bench, from which baguettes begin to appear (because drinking in a public place). And at that very moment, a large number of young people emergence from the adjacent benches and start to decision towards the “living” and the police car. The police seemingly received an urgent call then, due to the fact that they got into the car very rapidly and moved distant (of course, they did not have time to identify anyone).
Suffice it to say that in 4 years of intense wandering around the city and watching various pathological behaviors, only erstwhile I saw police intervention, 2 residential cafaries, who were seemingly influenced, were “wrapped” by baguettes. As a substance of fact, police officers took them very lightly if they considered the fact that the cabs had been rather intensely tangled with them and any of the police (there were quite a few them) were hit during the intervention.
I think my best opinion of the najntis will be given to specified an anecdata. Before I describe her, I'd like to stress that I've mostly dealt with the same youth as I have. 1 that was not peculiarly fond of science, but was far from violent environments (such people were besides known due to the fact that they had to be known, but it was not my immediate surroundings). 1 beautiful day, 1 of my friends decided to make fun of me and asked another friend to scurry to my home number and change my voice. I didn't care much about it (because it was the '90s) but I told about this fellow I was hanging out with. After the above mentioned loitering ended, my homies walked me under the cage and 2 of them suggested I wait, and they'd go inside and see if there was anyone lurking at me, due to the fact that it would be a small stupid if I got stabbed in front of my own house. As they said. And of course, no 1 there was lurking at me (the chronicle work makes me mention that this another colleague who “ranked” me after a fewer days [but that's not why we stopped hanging out]), however, these fellows (or average advanced school students) considered it better to check specified things out.
I'll be honest, I never truly thought about whether it all looked like my ass looked like it was, well, a shithole. I didn't think about it due to the fact that erstwhile I went to survey at the Greater Centre (which was Krakow), it looked much worse there, and besides, with conversations with fellow students I concluded that in this respect, my ass was not unique. However, even if it were. Even if this unfortunate Tarnobrzeg were for unknown reasons any "zone of war" in which these "exceptional things" happened, it should be remembered, however, that it was a "normal" violence, (Another conviction would be best to read Galadriela's voice from the first LOTR movie trilogy: "But in addition to this average force was another kind of violence." This kind of force was present throughout Poland and, as far as I know, in many places it looked worse than in my home country.
I'm certain you all figured out it was about skinheads. I dare say it was the most pathological subculture. As a substance of fact, we had “crazy” people, but at least in our country with scarfers it was that they were limited to beating themselves in the mouths of another scarfers, and “ordinary” people were very seldom moved (the talk about the “nadnis” of course, due to the fact that it changed afterwards). I know it looked different in another places. The same as in the case of the relations on the Scarf-skin line. There was no love between these 2 subcultures. It was only during the recording of the podcast episode about Rafal Wosiu that I learned that possibly my hometown was unique in this respect, due to the fact that in another places neo-Nazism was among the shalicans/kibols.
Another difference between the kibols and the skins of the day was that the first ones knew what they were doing and did not pretend that it was something another than beating themselves up and down with another kibols. With the skins, in turn, they did all this, in their opinion, “for the country.” If individual was raised in the 1990s (and the first decade of the 21st century), specified a individual should not be introduced to skinheads. If, on the another hand, individual grew up later, I would like to quote a passage of the Association Never More’s “Blanna Book”: (June 2000): "SANDOMIERZ. On June 16, 2 Nazi-skins attacked a 16-year-old student of Catholic advanced School. They first threw stones at her and then beat her with a metallic chain. The reason for the aggression was the racist views of bandits, the girl was a Mulat.” Incidentally, that peculiar situation with the SND I remembered. I tried to find any information about this, but this is the only “sign” after this event. In general I urge a brown book in its entirety, although I reserve that it is only for people with strong nerves.
As a substance of fact, it's not like you could have gotten the incorrect skin colour from the skins. Nothing like that. It was possible to get a mouth-to-face for example, that you had long hair (sometimes by the way they cut those hairs [I am curious if they were aware that they behaved like the Civic Militia in the times of PRLu]). You could get hit for a "shat shirt" and here I can service as proof of anecdotal, due to the fact that it was short, and I would get beat up for Samael's shirt. At least to make it “Ceremony of Opposites”, but it was “Eternal”. But if the 4 skins were looking for an excuse to beat up someone, even an absolutely novice shirt could have been enough. The chronicle work to mention that yet nothing happened to me, due to the fact that the street on which I lived (of course, I was asked where I was from, due to the fact that I was surely not from Tarnobrzeg) was known in the area for, well, “local patriotism” and “their own” cared about there, even for those for whom it did not like all day. And you know what else is simply a bump (in a few) of any random type, and what's different is simply a bump of this kind and risking being called on, but it's a digression.
With the force of skinheads it was just like with this “normal”. Everyone knew that, but nobody did anything about it. Which was so absurd that the same police who didn't give a crap about what the skins were doing organized advanced school meetings with young people and warned them against skinheads. And I know that from the point of view that I was in a gathering like this, and I learned so much from it that Mr. Policeman knows little about bald people than I do. possibly this police infirmity was connected with the fact that 1 of the skinheads was the boy of a city notabl.
But nothing good (for skins) lasts forever. Bald problems started after I went distant to study, so I only knew it from stories. You know, for many years it has been that bald people terrorized our city (in Sandomierz it was much worse in this respect, about which in a moment). They knew who could be beaten with impunity, and who (e.g. what settlements/streets) had to be taken care of. I have never heard of any of them having any legal problems (and they have been entitled to them for a long time). In theory, beaten by skinheads he could have turned himself in to the police (after having done a pre-production), but in practice, everyone was afraid of it. Well, okay, even if the police choice up Witek with Grzesiek, this Witek and Grzesiek have friends who will know what happened and who made it happen.
This kind of impunity is able to redecorate a man's head, and that's how it was with local skins. It's time for another digression here. Many times I have been told that in the course of describing any events (though and years ago), I was glared. It was no different in this case, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I don't remember what year it was, but most likely around 2001/2002. As part of informing me about what is happening in my hometown, I learned that a fewer skins (including the boy of a previously mentioned note) have just been explained in court from a beating.
Mo's first reaction was what? Turns out a bunch of skins were hunting people in town. It was crucial for them that individual “looked like a Jew.” And this time, the hit wanted the victims to study the full case to the police, and she was worried. From reasonably well - informed sources, I learned that a notabl had played an crucial function in the full case, which he tried to aid his boy and had the other effect. Then the next bald men began to have problems and any of them fled abroad in anticipation of the statute of limitations (which they succeeded).
For rather a long time, I was incapable to realize why all this was sprinkled on the skins at almost 1 minute and it only dawned on me, as I wrote the above passage of the Wall of Text. The reason everything changed was, in my opinion, administrative reform. Until TBG was a province, there were most likely quite a few things to sweep under the carpet, due to the fact that it was adequate to know local police. Then it got complicated, due to the fact that first of all, any policemen ran around the provincial commands (Rzeszów and Kielce were the main directions), and secondly, what if you knew the locals erstwhile you looked at their hands from the Provincial Command. Before the reform, Mr. Notabl could have saved his comfort, but after the reform, an effort to interfere in the investigation may have already upset individual in Rzeszów, and that most likely happened.
As a part of the interesting thing, I can add that in the neighbouring Sandomierz, the skinheads were much more deplorable, which was besides utilized by the local police, whose behaviour was, well, phenomenal. Incidentally, this is 1 of the fewer stories I have been able to verify online. erstwhile upon a time, I heard about how in Sandomierz the skins beat up a civilian police chief and “then the police took after them”. It happened to me due to the fact that I had no reason to uncertainty the credibility of the people who told me. It turned out to be a partial truth. In a moment, I will quote a passage from the article from Politics (prejudice, what you are about to read is so stupid that it is hard to believe), but first the situation background. It started with 1 of the local teachers writing to the city council that there was a skin problem in town.
First, the city council blew him off. Secondly, the chief of police was gracious to say: “If Mr. Godyń thinks that Sandomierz youth have been affected by Nazi plague, then as a teacher, he should take care of her upbringing”, and thirdly, the teacher was nailed to the door by a shuffle loop, painted the star David, and left an anonymous sign on the mat. erstwhile the teacher's wife went to the police, she was told by the work officer that erstwhile you mess with hooligans, you gotta deal with it, and the chief said: “This teacher lives in a dangerous area. possibly he should move?”. Unfortunately, it is impossible to halt the carousel of laughter at this point, due to the fact that it was so that the commandant shared these wisdoms with the community after being beaten by skinheads ( fasten your belts, due to the fact that it will shake):
“But I think the chief himself got the flat too. little than a year ago, he was beaten in the evening by a bald group. I was taking my dog for a walk and I told them they were besides loud. They didn't know who I was, I was a civilian," he says. erstwhile he was lying on the ground and it looked like the worst, he shouted that he was the commandant. It worked, the perpetrators escaped. The court treated them mildly, the ringleader was given probation. The chief explains that if he were in uniform, no 1 would contact him. The boys were just wrong.” (Article of June 2004).
Does that mean that a cop doesn't blame the skins due to the fact that they beat him just due to the fact that he was in civilian service? Yes. Does this mean that if they were to “not wrong” and beat up a civilian, would the commandant not complain? Yeah. possibly he would tell specified a individual to decision or blame the teachers.
I'm going to add another layer from the 2005 GW article to this curiosity. Well, Sandomierz skins attracted the attention of PiS MP Przemysław Gosinski (died in Smolensk in 2010): "The case became loud after PiS MP Przemysław Gosiewski reported to the territory Attorney's Office in Kielce about Sandomierz's terroristization by fascist groups. The investigation in this case was dropped last September. The local police and the D.A.'s office have spared the case. I have informed the Office of Complaints, Applications and Mirroring of the National Prosecutor's Office in Warsaw - says Gosiewski.". If Robert Bąkiewicz had read this statement, he would have been so humanly sorry.
On the another hand, the most spectacular way of knowing how much police/etc did not want to deal with skins "until the time", described Kąki (yes, I know, Kąki, it is Kąki) in the book "Bialystok. White strength, black memory". Well, there were tolerated skins for so long that, for example, they threatened an ABW agent, set fire to apartments/etcs. If not for the fact that 1 of the victims went to the media, we would most likely not have seen the tremendous “we're going after you” performed by Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz (from which we “go after you” yet came little).
It is worth noting that even in these ancient times, where force was so much around that we treated it as a norm – no 1 had any uncertainty about the fact that skinheads were highly pathological subculture due to their highly violent behavior.
We request to add another part to this puzzle. If it were that these skids would simply gather in packs and as part of this gathering from time to time they would beat people (sometimes, as the chief of command who was kicked by the skins said, the boys were incorrect and they beat the incorrect ones), then it could be considered that ok, it was utmost pathology, but it all died natural death, due to the fact that the skins are now very few, so they are not dangerous, right?
As the character from my favourite movie “Smolensk” said: “It is not simple, and even the opposite.” Skins as specified are virtually no longer present, but the problem was that it does not mean that these "watahs" died naturally. It so happens that skins, what a coincidence, frequently and densely belonged to specified an organization as the All-Polish Youth. Which he even laughed at his time, Winnicki. Well, you know, possibly they did it there in this MW, but (werble) they did it (and how ironic) due to the fact that they were identified with Nazis/etc. Unfortunately, only a part of this interview has been preserved (it is most likely in any archive).
Winnicki gave this interview in 2017, so he most likely forgot how the scandal broke out in 2006 erstwhile he said: “There was a movie in the media from an event organized by young people who played against the flags of Polish and Nazi flags hanging side by side and burned swastika-shaped torches. They raised their hands in the fascist salute "S*eg h*il" (my stellaration so as not to irritate J.E. Algorithm on FB)". The organization was in 2004, so who would remember that?
I have no thought what percent of MW were skinheads, but I dare say that alternatively significant, due to the fact that if you could most likely find any young “cutters” in the mediate of nowhere, it looked different and everyone was taken as it was going. Which I could see erstwhile my colleague Krzysztof, mixing in the block next door, wanted to join the MW. We utilized to sit on the bench in the evening and Krzysztof (who, euphemizing, was not an intellectual eagle), began to tell me about what he learned at the MW meeting. In telegraphic summary, these were conspiracy theories concerning Jews. Had it not been for context, it would have been rather amusing that the accident wanted that I had heard identical wisdom a small earlier. I do not want to be misunderstood erstwhile I wrote that it was identical due to the fact that it was identical (sometimes having a good memory has its advantages).
Before the situation becomes tense and individual thinks, sweet hedgehog, Picnic was in the All-Polish Youth, let me explain the full situation. I've heard all these things before, in my spiritual class. Apparently, the sowing of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories was part of the teaching of religion in SP10 in the 1995/1996 school year. It was then that presidential elections were held and the priest conducting classes with us explained to us that we should convince parents not to vote for Kwasniewski, due to the fact that Kwasniewski is known who, and his real name is “Schtolzmann”. erstwhile 1 of her colleagues asked you what she had against the Jews, the priest gave us a lecture from which I learned what Krzysztof learned at the gathering of the All-Polish Youth. But remember, compose out children from wellness education, due to the fact that there will be demoralization there, and you don't know what these children will be teaching there (yes, I know, part of the school has creative planning of lessons, so that besides many kids for EZ did not go), and you can learn this from, among another things, Krzysztof Bosak, who was president of the All-Polish Youth.
I don't want to be misunderstood. I am not trying to propose that Krzysztof Bosak was a skinhead (for pity). He simply chiefed an organization that eagerly accepted highly violent pitchers, whose superior number was in love with the legacy of a certain Austrian watercolor.
The question of skins in MW, which was underestimated by erstwhile president Robert Winnicki, is very crucial in my opinion. due to the fact that it wasn't that the All-Polish Youth didn't know who she was taking into her ranks. Unless the bald kind in the algae, flyers and any “celtic” necklaces are not acquainted with anything (this will be a bit later), but it is most likely a alternatively improbable scenario. Young people of All Poland were not any debate club (although present Bosak, Winnicki and others are trying very hard to impose such, not another narrative). It was an highly right-wing organization that wanted to fight “enemies”. And in order to fight them (not with Oxford debates), she recruited the "muscles" she needed to fight them.
Since Krzysztof Bosak is simply a supporter of “Healthy Reason”, let us look at the activities of the MW through the prism of this. say it is simply a average political organization that wants average methods (i.e. by means of elections) to take over the authorities in the country. Why did they request skinheads? To collect signatures and hand out electoral flyers? Or did they want to send them to the media to discuss with politicians? Winnicki and his like tried to convince us that the skins were received there by accident. In another words, they were given a chance and admitted to the MW even though they were mostly very violent people who had considerable problems controlling aggression. but it's not true. These people were admitted there due to the fact that they were violent. due to the fact that MW was never a “normal” political organization but 1 for which street force was a natural method of conducting political struggle.
Interestingly, at the minute erstwhile MW began to transform into an image (from an association organization [this is simply a very appropriate term] of skinheads, into an organization where young educated people from various centres are granted], a full bunch of people were talking about it inactive being the same organization, due to the fact that the conversion of flyers to navy does not change anything. But you know, it's not like you gotta take my word for it, due to the fact that then I'm going to describe in item how, despite the efforts of Bosaks/Winnicki/etc. from right-wing organizations (all NOP ointments/etc.) one more time their love of force came out.
Understandably, it wasn't like the full society was intimidated erstwhile police were inactive. There were bottom-up initiatives (as opposed to the right-wing ones, which were not bottom-up and could always number on e.g. the support of the church, or the ruling party, who willingly gave them millions of zlotys from the budget), whose main business was to straighten out skinheads and these akin pleasantries. I mean, of course, various organizations that are referred to as "Antiphy". Incidentally, these organizations (at least some) cannot be denied effectiveness, due to the fact that (which for apparent reasons I will not be able to source) from the rich correspondence of a gentleman from ONR we could learn that they were paying kiboloms (or the Chorz Movement) for protection from Antifa.
This is interesting, that now the utmost right in Poland is building narratives that indicate that long ago, the real warlords were the Antifists, and mediocre patriotic youth had to defend themselves against them. For the sake of explanation, I am absolutely certain that, among those who lashed after the bald murders, there were different "bad" people. but that it didn't substance much in a situation where they were frequently the only force that was able to subregulation skinheads and their like.
At this point, it is worth mentioning that it was very loud about the Antifogs erstwhile on 1 of the Marches of independency they tried to block this organization and beat any fellows active in reconstruction (then they got into a fight with the police) and on this basis the right built narratives about a terrible antifa that haunts people. In another words, the far right managed to balance respective years of force in the performance of skinheads/etc in communicative terms. 1 (although it must be admitted that very medial) event where the "second party" was to blame.
However, it was not so that attempts to explain that skinheads are not the bad ones at all started only after the alleged independency March in 2011. Nothing like that. erstwhile upon a time, I came across YT on a documentary that Fronda made for TVP and which active skinheads. The paper is dated to 1995, so it may not have been the apogee of skin violence, but it was already “very” present on our streets. How you will not be amazed erstwhile you read that in this paper no 1 else appears, specified as Genghis-chan Research, Rafał Ziemkiewicz, who tells that there are organizations that are expected to fight fascism, but in fact they are fascist (yup, this communicative on the Polish right is at least 30 years old) and that actually these organizations, as they do not have fascists to beat, beat another people. If it wasn't for context, it would be funny.
It is worth mentioning that Ziemkiewiczow was gracious to defend skinheads besides in his Wiekopomomów Works. For example, in “Michnikovszczyń” he explained that Gazeta Wyborcza is be, due to the fact that its editors see nothing incorrect ”in the alignment of Naziol to SS’ (this is simply a literal quote). In the same paragraph, there is much more honest gold, but quoting it as FB is pointless due to the fact that it would require fart stars). Ziemkiewicz explained that in Gazeta Wyborcza: "For the last sixteen years, much has been written about neo-fascists, for various reasons much more than would have been due to the actual size of the phenomenon." And that's all that Ziemkiewicz's got, due to the fact that if you don't gotta compare the bald to the SS, that means that they're not fascists, and that means that even if there are articles out there that describe what skins do (e.g. their Sandomierz activities), it's not truly a Neofascism subject, is it? By the way, I wonder if these statements and writings by Ziemkiewicz were the consequence of the fact that he had no thought what the skins were doing in Poland in the 1990s, or if he had any thought about it, but he was Ziemkiewicz, so he had to defend the good name of the far right. We'll most likely never know.
Over time, skinheads were getting smaller and smaller. The same was actual with beatings and attacks in the far right (I would not want to be misunderstood, it came to them, it comes to them and it will come to them, but this is simply a very different scale than in the 1990s and the first decade of the 21st century). As far as the attacks are concerned, it was rather simple here. Their numbers decreased due to the fact that abruptly it turned out that actions could have consequences and for beatings, criminal/etc threats, you could go to prison. At 1 point, people stopped being reluctant and started reporting matters to the police (to make their own impressions)etc. and these things had to be so much that it would be hard to ignore it as in the "natives". Second issue – technological progress. erstwhile they beat individual up in the 1990s, if they didn't do it in front of witnesses, the victim might have had quite a few problem proving who beat her. Sometimes witnesses were, but the police didn't give a shit. All this changed at the minute erstwhile we practically all started carrying cameras and cameras in our pockets, the city's monitoring stopped working only theoretically, the stores began to mount cameras "external" etc. While the hazard of "burning" in the 1990s was virtually zero, respective years later it was rather considerable. So it was not that the far right restricted violent behaviour due to the fact that it understood that they were wrong. The utmost right inactive believes that force is good, but must (and inactive must) limit itself due to a much greater hazard of consequences.
Someone might say, okay, but at least there are less skins. And partially I could agree with that. Bald types in flyers, with neo-Nazi symbolism (or even this 3rd Reich) are almost gone. Only that it is only a change on the "style" level. These people have precisely the same views (maybe even more radical) and they just dress differently. Some, alternatively of flyers, now wear scales of different bands. Although in the 1990s kiboles were not always utmost nationalists (as I mentioned in my hometown they were practically completely separate), now it is practically 1 and the same. And unless I have any illusions about the fact that in the 1990s racism and nationalism were present “in the heads” of our fellow countrymen, however, after 2015 the views that were then proclaimed by comparatively niche environments entered mainstream. In conclusion, although the skins are almost gone, their views did not vanish along with them.
And at this point, I'm going to end the first part of this dilemma, due to the fact that although I haven't planned to divide it into 2 parts during this storey, this minute is perfect for "spausing." due to the fact that in the next part we will decision in a somewhat more "modern" times, practically everything that is described in it will be sourced.
Source:
https://uwak.tvn.pl/reportaze/city-moldoon-bandjorow-ls6694510
https://www.neverwiecej.org/pdf/en/brunatnaksiega.pdf
https://www.polska1918-89.pl/pdf/friars-in-mundurach,1364.pdf
https://www.polityka.pl/archivepolitics/1824142,1,lyso-inbsprzyno.read
https://kielce.eborcza.pl/kielce/7,47262,2901546.html
https://oko.press/antifa-like-non-existent-organization-incorporated-mind-right-analysis
https://wmeritum.pl/former-president-young-of-the-all-Polish-tlms-why-representative-event-sie-hajlowac-ironia/189806
https://wisla.nasmiato.pl/premier-kaczynski-i-vice-prime-gier-indignant/ar/c1-6543553
Ziemkiewicz's speech starts about after the first
minute:
