The president of the United States is not giving up on prestigious universities from the Ivy League. The conflict with the Harvard authorities is inactive ongoing. Donald Trump's squad indicates that the university lowered teaching standards and radicalized ideologically. It is besides to be supplied with cash from the mediate East and is politicized.
Victor Davis Hanson, an associate of "The regular Signal", a historian associated with Hoover Institution at Stanford University, referred to this issue more widely. He is besides the host of the broadcast "The Victor Davis Hanson Show", as well as the author of the website "The Blade of Perseus".
Hanson focused primarily on elite law schools specified as Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, Stanford Law School, UC Berkeley’s Law School.
The scientist pointed out that the names of these institutions are constantly mentioned if we “take care of all those territory judges who issue injunctions against president Donald Trump, or look at many of the most influential people in the Obama or Biden Justice Department, or even any Department of Justice, or if we look at the PAC and political organizations that effort to influence public opinion and look at lawyers.”
The problem with them is that these universities "are no longer empirical" and are guided by non-scientific criteria. In addition, they were dominated by lecturers associated with the Democratic organization and another left-wingers in about 95 percent. Moreover, they are to “do things that they have not done in the past.” First of all, they reduced recruitment standards, politicised universities and became dependent on funds flowing from mediate east countries.
Hanson noted that Harvard, which has always been traditionally classified—together with Yale or Stanford—in first or second place, now dropped out of the top 5 colleges in the planet according to the U.S. News & planet Report.
To get to Harvard, you had to pass a very hard math course. However, as more and more students had a problem with his enrollment, recruitment rules were changed, and for 3 or 4 years, as with another campuses, no comparative rating of the GPA average or the SAT exam, determining the student's potential, was made.
Law schools have changed their curricula to take into account the requirements of DEI (so-called: diversity, equality and inclusion), by changing recruitment policies. Thus, they left the LSAT mid-terms and exam system, focusing on obtaining students from the mediate East, especially from Qatar, as they guaranteed a cash flow.
This full process of change, introduced at least a decade ago, has contributed to the admission of many students who would have had no chance of getting into elite law studies.
The curriculum was besides amended to reflect the interests of extremist groups in the mediate East.
The consequence is that now many law firms express disappointment with the skills of fresh graduates of these universities.
Stanford "stranged" erstwhile it turned out that in 2022 only about 84 percent of his alumni passed the bar exam on the first approach, and this at the lowered standards of the California Bar Association.
To reverse this negative trend, university authorities quietly began to change their recruitment policy. They began to accept more – not much, but two, three, 4 conservative or at least average professors of law. They besides joined the trial with extremist student activism, which translated into a lower level of education. As a result, 95 percent of the graduates passed the bar exam on the first approach in 2024.
Hanson points out that law schools are very crucial and must be depoliticised, made them halt being ideologicalized, radical, and focused on the conventional curriculum of law teaching.
Some universities understood that a fewer years ago. They have made changes, resulting in the ranking of the best institutions of universities so far little noted, e.g. Vanderbilt.
Hanson urges you to quit the precedence treatment of graduates specified as Harvard, Stanford or Yale, due only to their brand, but to take into account the professional quality of individual individuals. This would force the Ivy League (Ivy League) and prestigious schools to rapidly adapt, halt the politicization and influx of abroad money or the alleged spread of anti-Semitism.
Source: dailysignal.com
AS
