Krzysztof Bosak accused Donald Tuskow of disinformation of the public after the Seym retained Charles Nawrocki's 3rd veto to the crypto-activist marketplace bill on 4 September. 241 Members voted against, 25 not enough. The dispute concerns investor protection, but the Prime Minister mixes future supervision with work for the collapse of Zondacrypto.
Bosak: This bill would not save Zonda
Krzysztof Bosak challenged the prime minister's main rhetorical procedure. Donald Tusk combined opposition to the bill with work for the Zondacrypto scandal and threat from Russian services. The Deputy talker of the Sejm replied that the government task could not change the destiny of the company, which according to the information cited by the Estonian syndicate was to be insolvent as early as 2022.
Bosak besides pointed out that the company did not control its reserves, yet it underwent audits and operated for subsequent years. In Poland there was not even a draft government on which Members voted in 2026. Therefore, the politician called Tusk's communicative manipulation and stated that the Prime Minister was disinformation to the public. Bosak's fuller position on hazard in the cryptocurrency market it comes down to a simple warning: the bill or the authoritative stamp will not remove the investment risk.
The Sejm held the 3rd veto
Official consequence of the Sejm vote points out that on 4 September, 241 Members were in favour of re-legislating, against 198 and 3 abstained. At 442 voters, the majority of the 3 fifths were 266.
So 25 votes were missing to reject the veto.. This was the 3rd unsuccessful effort to break the opposition of president Karol Nawrocki to the regulation of the crypto-activism market.
Before the vote, Tusk spoke of infiltration of political environments and citing information from the ABW and the Intelligence Agency. He claimed cryptocurrency was utilized to finance Russian sabotage and intelligence activities. The Prime Minister's Office maintains that the act would give Polish services the chance to act besides towards companies registered outside Poland. This is simply a serious argument, but it does not give the Prime Minister the right to replace the dispute over circumstantial provisions with the proposition that each opponent of the task acts for criminals or a abroad state.
Zondacrypto's political and organization background requires a full explanation. If the services have evidence of crime, the case should go to the D.A. and the court. Liability must be individual, based on evidence. The Parliamentary talker cannot replace criminal proceedings.
The president has identified circumstantial shortcomings in the bill
The dispute does not concern the specified question whether the crypto-active marketplace should be governed by rules. Karol Nawrocki presented his own plan and felt that client protection was needed. However, he vetoed the government version as it provided for advanced surveillance costs, administrative blocking of domains and the anticipation of extending the blocking of the account to up to six months without prior approval from the court.
W official justification for veto Among another things, the president indicated a maximum supervisory fee of up to 0.4% of the average revenues of the service provider, no little than the equivalent of EUR 500. For issuers of part of tokens, a rate of up to 0.5% is provided, besides with a lower threshold of 500 euro. The Presidential Palace proposed to reduce costs and strengthen judicial review, but the amendments were rejected.
The free marketplace needs law, not propaganda
Bosak is apt for abuse: a bill adopted in 2026 could not prevent problems increasing since 2022. Tusk uses the real threat of Russian diversion to politically stigmatize the project's opponents alternatively of honestly responding to allegations of costs and constitutional guarantees. State safety is besides crucial to make him a baton in a organization dispute.
Poland needs effective regulation of crypto-activisms, but written for Polish citizens and entrepreneurs. Oversight is intended to prosecute frauds, defend savings and hinder financing of hostile operations. By the way, it cannot destruct home companies or let administration to long blockades without fast court control. Polish money, economical freedom and the ability of the state to defend its own marketplace are at stake. This will not be done by authoritative maximism or pretending that there is no risk.
Source: Confederation, Office of the Prime Minister, Office of the president of Poland, To Things
