Bodnar, who is he?

Bodnar proved to be an effective activist in the field - to say as much as possible - of fighting 1 group of interests with another group. possibly he has it in his mentality, possibly he just learned it. He was an ombudsman for a long time. It was (unless) effective. He's been spotted. What does that mean? In the case of a group he was to support, it was adequate erstwhile he stated that, for example, the legislature was a giraffe. Here his function as if it was ending; then the legislator had to prove that he was not a giraffe. Contrary to appearances, sometimes specified evidence is difficult. Hence his actions were assessed by "needers" as effective. Not only in Poland; he was besides noticed in Germany. Hence the awards. Of course, not as prestigious German awards as Tusk nominated to take the highest positions. Let us say that they were adequate for a position no higher than the minister; therefore, I would be very amazed if he had achieved a greater success in the state administration than at present, not planned by the animators. Yet, he was discerned of what was easy to learn from the rewards. I know, the award is simply a very prestigious thing, but there is besides an crucial context and who the donors of this award are. In this case,
That Bodnar is seen by (German) animators proves the rewards he received. Awards and awards are interesting as reflecting trends in supporting certain concepts of supra-national importance. Consider, for example, the Legion of Honor or the awards of various foundations.
During the ceremony of awarding Adam Bodnar the Dialoguepreis award awarded by the national Association of German-Polish Societies, the erstwhile Ombudsman compared Poles to a "wild animal" for which Germany should "take responsibility". (...) Polish legal culture and transformations after 1989 were inspired and supported by German legal thought. This was based on the construction in Poland of a modern regulation of law, human rights and democracy protection mechanisms. We have based our European integration on this," he said." But it besides gives the mentor a peculiar responsibility. Like in the parable of small Prince. If the animal is tamed, then it cannot be abandoned later– he continued.
Of course it's true. But not in the case of a proud, rather large state in Europe (not a "roop") which has had many years of conflict for its existence as independent from another states. Countries that were victims of Germany in their time. So possibly that's enough?
So who's Adam Bodnar? An authoritative who diminishes, how is it possible, the importance of independent Poland?
As for the author's last paragraph, I think it's interesting to call Hitler a Marxist. Although he did not treat the doctrine "namely" as Soviets, he considered it to be true. Like Marxism-Leninism, he assumed that about 10% of the population had to be exterminated to change the world. The difference is that the Germans exterminated another nations (Jews) and Marxists-Leninists of people who, according to them, had a different attitude towards matters concerning ownership of "production measures" as "production forces". It's the only difference. Is this an argument that Germany should "take care of Poland"?
Links used:
]]>https://drzeczy.pl/observator-mediaov/219532/byly-rpo-bodnar-porowni-p...]]>
]]>https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/content/adam-bodnar-reward-citizen-rp]]>