In 1904, Pope Pius X decided to make a uniform Code of the Church. In 1917, the Codex was announced. The next fresh Codex was discussed from 1962 to 1965 at the Second Vatican Council and was completed in 1983. John Paul II and Benedict XVI interfered in the Codex only once, while Francis interfered in it 11 times, changing 137 canons. Here we see that the Codex and canons change, unlike the truths of God, which are unchanging. But it should be known that if heretics abuse the Code against the foundations of these unchanging truths of God or interpret it against them, then it becomes invalid and ineffective, as all papers in the hands of heretics and apostasies.
Bergoglio denies and nullifies present God's laws and commandments on which the Code of the Church is based. Therefore, the church code is invalid in his hands.
video: ]]>https://vkpatriarhat.org/en/?p=22158]]>
]]>https://krishtus-zaszlaja.wistia.com/medias/vtturhg67s]]>
]]>https://bcp-video.org/en/kary-ecclesiastical-cic/]]>]]>https://cos.tv/videos/play/54177720319906816]]>]]>https://rumble.com/v579zd-kary-kocielny.html]]>]]>https://youtu.be/_jhSEYSBhDA]]>
A public heretic, occupying the papal office, Jorge Bergoglio, calls this a crime of schism erstwhile any of the priests or bishops cease to mention his name in Liturgy, or the name of an overt heretic. What does the 15th regulation of the Constantinople Council of 861 say about this?
The regulation states that anyone who ceases to mention in Liturgy an overt heretic who publically proclaims and openly teaches an mistake condemned by the Holy Councils or Fathers (or straight by the Scriptures) and separates himself from unity with him even before his authoritative condemnation,Not only is he not subject to the law’s repentance, but he deserves respect. due to the fact that he did not condemn bishops, but false bishops and false teachers. specified priests did not follow schism, but, on the contrary, tried to defend the Church from schisms and divisions.
Schism is carried out by a heretic (false bishop and false pope) who leads to heresy and abuses for this ecclesiastical power.
Public heretic Jorge Bergoglio on 20 June 2024 summoned Archbishop Carlo Mario Vigano to court in order to initiate the alleged excommunication process for the alleged schism crime.
The Archbishop stated that he had no intention of appearing: ‘DicasteriaI did not hand over any message or paper in my defence due to the fact that I do not admit its authority, I do not admit the authority of its prefect, and I do not admit the authority of the individual who appointed it.”, or the overt heretic of Bergoglio. Instead, he published his complaints on both the invalid pope and the Second Vatican Council:
“In the presence of my brothers in the bishopric and in front of the full Church, I accuse Jorge Maria Bergoglio of heresy and schism, requiring him to be judged as a heretic and schizmatist and removed from his position, which he held unworthyly for over 11 years. This in no way contradicts the saying «Prima Sedes a nemine judicatur» (the Holy See no 1 thinks) due to the fact that it is apparent that since a heretic cannot presume the papal office, he is not above the prelates who justice him.”
In the present situation, all bishops should follow the example of this erstwhile nuncio in the United States, which clearly distances itself from heretic. Otherwise, if they perceive to Bergoglio and submit to him, they bring God’s anatomy upon themselves. It is widely known that Bergoglio dedicated himself to Satan in Canada and issued the heretical declaration "Fiducia supplicans", in which he legalizes 1 of the heaviest sins – sodomy – and besides this sin blesses. This declaration by abuse of power draws the full Church into interior suicide, due to the fact that the blessing of the heaviest sin is simply a clear rebellion against God's laws and commandments.
Furthermore, the essence of our salvation is eliminated, the redeeming death of Christ for our sins and the essential condition of salvation, which is repentance. So Bergoglio converted the Catholic Church into the antiquities of fresh Age, or synagogue of Satan. In this extraordinary situation, bishops are obliged to separate themselves before God, along with their dioceses, from an overt archeretic, who has excluded himself from the Church, and so is not and cannot be his head. Fear of church punishments of the Code of Canon Law in this situation is not justified.
Archbishop Vigano made it clear that he did not admit the power of dicastery, nor its prefect, nor who appointed it. No bishop or priest shall be in union with the archeretician, and if so, shall bear the same punishment as the archeretic – God's anathema, or curse of God according to Ga 1.8-9. This is an exclusion not only from the outside body of the Church, but besides from the Mystical Body of Christ. At the time of his death, specified a bishop and priest would be condemned if he did not separate before, or repent.
Tragikomedia with Archbishop Vigano is that he is punished for faithfulness to Christ and teaching the Church. He does not respect as his head the overt heretic Bergoglio, who excluded himself from the Church.
In short, in the hands of Bergoglio and his sects, ecclesiastical punishments are invalid and ineffective, and whoever takes them into account is forced to argue Christ and His Gospel and legalize sin.
The rightful Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano represents the rightful Church and the full Tradition. It is outside the apostate structure of the Church, transformed by Bergoglia. Thus, in this situation, he can sanctify bishops and is not bound by the Codex, which in the hands of the overt heretic Bergoglio is invalid. If, due to betrayal and cowardice, many bishops stay under curse and do not separate themselves from archiheretics, God can establish in these dioceses a new, rightful structure of bishopry.
+ Elijah
Patriarch of Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate
+ OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
bishops-secretaries
5.07.2024
