JOE BIDEN DISCHARGED:He violated the U.S. Code with incriminating evidenceAnd here it is.proof
From SOTN: The analysis below which violates Joe Biden's individual and professional crimes is equally indisputable as legally justified. There are various elements that make up this irrefutable legal case against the perpetrator of the VPOTUS crime, which do not include even a much larger wave of crime committed by Biden's full crime household – an global criminal syndicate at the level of RICO.
Known as "BIG Guy", Joe Biden effectively functioned as Capo di tutti capi of his stealth veiled Irish-American mob family. In this capacity, criminal don mafia Joe Biden received a 10% discount in what was fundamentally a highly organized criminal syndicate, whose illegal activities were conducted worldwide with a clear violation of the Crime and Corrupt Organizations Act.
As a professional criminal politician, Joe Biden mastered the art of trading influence so much that many of his closest associates secretly called him "Grifter". They were well aware that the full Biden household had been systematically utilized to carry out many attacks worldwide. As Obama's overwhelmingly corrupt vice president, shameless deception of large and tiny nations was in fact the main part of his description of double work.
In fact, highly illegal and chaotic Obamaancy, which present defines the erstwhile United States of America, was only possible due to the fact that Biden was conducting his various crimes behind the scenes. In fact, even Obama said Biden has "the ability to fuck things". That's why Biden was chosen by his globalist NWO champions to straight bargain the POTUS 202o election from president Trump.
If the Americans knew the actual depth and scope of Joe Biden's full criminal career, he would be excluded from office for life while serving a life conviction to discourage all another politicians from reckless abuse of their office for specified wicked financial advantages.
State of the Nation
16 September 2023.
N.B. Patriots, delight send the following legal analysis to any U.S. congressman, while the impeachment investigation is underway – thank you.
JOE BIDEN DISCHARGED
Anonymous expert
Legal SOTN Exclusive
UNITED STATES CODE:
Joe Biden is permanently disqualified from the occupation
any public office in the U.S. national government
Joe Biden cannot hold a public officein the U.S. government – that's why!
As he himself admitted, then vice president Joe Biden used
over $1 billion US government credit guarantees in a bribery program to endanger the president
Ukrainian immediate dismissal of the lawyer General who investigated
on corruption practices of Burisma Holdings and
the engagement of huntsman Biden's Executive Director.
This crime is simply a national crime and
disqualifies Biden from his public duties.
All hard evidence and applicable government are in line with this simple legal analysis.
First, here's Biden's unequivocal confession to the crime on video:
Federal Corruption Practices Act
Here is the applicable section of the abroad Corruption Practices Act, which is codified as United States national law, which strictly "rejects American citizens and entities from bribing abroad government officials to gain benefits for their business interests".
15 United States Code § 78dd–1 – Forbidden practices of abroad trade of issuers
The existing section of the United States Codex can be found in 15 U.S. Code § 78dd-1 as follows:
Source:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/78dd-1
Guidelines of the US Department of Justice
Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Justice published a "Review", which states that what Vice president Joe Biden did, threatening to suspend credit guarantees for Ukraine, was a gross violation of American national law.
The Section for Financial Abuse of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice explains what constitutes a violation of the abroad Corruption Practices Act as follows.
Source: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-works-act#:~:text=The%20Foreign%20Corrupt%20Practics%20Act,in%20obtaining %20or%20retaining
%20business.
Federal Code
There is then an appropriate section of the national Regulations Code (e-CFR), which clearly states that no U.S. national Government worker should usage its public office for private benefit. The following passage is taken from: 5 CFR § 2635.702 – usage of public office for private benefit.
(a) Encouraging or forcing benefits. An worker shall not usage or licence the usage of his or her post or governmental title or any authority related to his or her public office in specified a way as to coerce or induce another person, including the subordinate, to supply any benefit, financial or other, to himself or to his or her friends, relatives or persons with whom the worker is associated in a non-governmental capacity.
Here is simply a screenshot of the same CFR regulation, which applies straight to Joe Biden's authoritative malpractice, while VPOTUS and acting on behalf of his boy huntsman Biden as a associate of the Burisma Holding Limited Board of Directors, a Ukrainian company.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/5/2635.702
18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses
There is then a national bill codified by the United States Code concerning "the bribery of public officials and witnesses". besides in this case, Vice president Biden clearly acted against both 18 U.S.C. § 201 (b) (1) in relation to the donor and § 201 (b) (2) in relation to the recipient, in the bribery of a public official.
18 U.S.C. § 201 prohibits bribery and the acceptance of circumstantial gratuities. United States ultimate Court in on the United States v Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398, 404-405 (1999), describes these 2 crimes as follows:
"The first offence described in § 201(b)(1) with respect to the donor and § 201(b)(2) with respect to the recipient is bribery which requires demonstrating that something of value has been corrupted, offered or promised to a public officer (as to the donor) or Corupated, sought, received, accepted or agreed to be admitted or accepted by a public authoritative (as to the recipient) with the intention, inter alia, of "impact on any authoritative activity" (the donor) or in exchange for "effect on any authoritative activity" (the recipient). The second offence, as defined in § 201(c)(A) in respect of the donor and § 201(c)(B) in respect of the recipient, is an prohibited gratification which requires demonstrating that something of value has been transmitted, offered or promised to a public officer (as donor), or was requested, received, accepted or agreed to be admitted or accepted by a public officer (as recipient), "for the benefit or due to any authoritative act carried out or to be carried out by specified a public officer".
The feature distinguishing all crime is its component of intent. Bribery requires the intent to "institute" an authoritative act or to "be influenced" in an authoritative act, whereas an illegal tip only requires that a tip be granted or accepted "for or due to the fact that of" an authoritative act. In another words, in the case of bribery, there must be a quid pro quo, a concrete intention to deliver or receive something valuable in exchange for an authoritative act. On the another hand, illegal gratification can only be a reward for any future action that a public officer will take (and could have already taken) or for an act from the past that he has already taken.
The U.S. Government Ethics Office does not issue an opinion on 18 U.S.C. §201, but, where appropriate, may supply links to applicable information on this subject.
The screenshot below is taken from: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/foreign-corrupt-practics-act
Covering up Vice president Joe Biden's senatorial records
There's another serious violation of national law that Joe Biden is guilty of: deliberately hiding his senatorial record. These records are now at Delaware University, and Biden himself may let their release.
In this peculiar context, Biden's refusal to disclose these public records is simply a brazen violation of U.S. Code 18 § 2071, which concerns "hiding, removing or mutilating generally" government registers, documents, files, etc. The letter of law can be read on the screenshot below taken from Cornell Law School. Disqualification clause is marked in blue.
Source:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
KEY POINT: Joe Biden is not the first POTUS Democratic candidate to be disqualified from acting as a public office due to concealing or destroying government documents. Hillary Clinton besides had a ban (in accordance with national law) on moving for president before the 2016 election due to deliberate removal and demolition of authoritative government email correspondence. See: Sometimes the hard fact appears in the funniest places... like the Legal Library.
Conclusion
Joe Biden, acting as the authoritative vice president of the United States of America, bribed the government of Ukraine to force president Petr Poroshenko to release the lawyer General. This criminal act was carried out with the clear intention of ending an ongoing criminal investigation into Burisma Holdings Limited, as well as stopping the investigation and avoiding prosecution of his son, the manager of the board of huntsman Biden.
Various sections of the United States Code describe this authoritative behaviour as criminal and so prosecuted, as well as disqualification to execute public functions in the U.S. government. Given the utmost gravity of Biden's crime and the gross breach of public confidence, the POTUS Democratic candidate is effectively excluded from seeking any public office until his criminal case is decently tried and settled. Moreover, Biden's deliberate concealment of his senatorial act further contributes to this open and closed case, which requires his permanent ban on public office.
K A S E C L O S E D!
Anonymous expert
Legal State of the Nation
updated: September 16, 2023
Video evidence of Joe Biden's crime
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=24296
