We lost the court conflict over fireplaces, I'm sad.
I feel like the logic of the law has lost to ideology and pride. The court motivated that the anti-community resolution had a legitimate wellness and environmental objective, the case had already been investigated respective years ago and found no flaws. However, earlier judgments did not analyse whether a home with a fireplace was a bet, due to the fact that no 1 previously raised this absurdity resulting from the statutory definitions. possibly the judges lacked courage and were afraid to admit me right, due to the fact that at the same time they would gotta admit the mistake and failing to see in erstwhile judgments about this anti-community resolution.
That's why we pay the courts well to defend us from political violations. one more time after the SCT, we're disappointed.
If the court tolerates absurdly that a home with a fireplace is simply a bet due to the fact that politicians have invented it, it surely does not service the “good of justice”.
The court considered that the fireplace was an installation, specified as a waste pre-processing installation. If you have a fireplace, your home is simply a bet... I quote to you the provision of the Environmental Protection Law, Art. 3, paragraph 48) “the plant – this means 1 or more installations, along with the area to which the operator has a legal title and the equipment on which it is located;”
Thank you all for your support, especially the crew. Open Wieliczka and manufacture organizations – Zdunów, Kominars, Installers, Farmers who were present and supported me in this process.
Thank you for not being alone.
More in the following article on Pressmania.
