The feeling is that erstwhile 1 wants and the another does not, the problem lies not in the meritum (which in good religion can be negotiated), but in the primitive conflict of alpha males. And we are dealing with such: the alpha male is Prime Minister Tusk, the alpha male is Minister Sikorski, and the president feels even stronger due to the fact that the alpha male king. In addition, the males come from hostile tribes, while the French concept of co-habitation, i.e. consistent co-regulation of political antagonists, may make sense in France, but not in Poland, where even diplomacy is stretched between pride and diarrhea.
When Donald Trump's presidential word ended, Republican Ambassador Georgette Mosbacher left Warsaw, and Mark Brzeziński, a typical of the democratic administration, began to look forward. The staff model utilized in mature systems, in which the ambassador – a professional diplomat or well-deserved politician – represents a government elected in elections, is understandable. The fresh Prime Minister wants his representative, not the loser's graver. King Duda, however, does not seem to be grasping this by refusing to accept change, as it violates his prerogatives, or ego. It is actual that the fresh ambassador must have the signature of the head of state at the nomination and credentials list, but Duda sees his prerogatives – like any monarch – wider. Yes, he appoints and dismisses ambassadors, although God and fact can only do so at the request of a government that is constitutionally liable for abroad policy. This, in turn, gives Minister Sikorski arguments to make specified changes in the institutions to meet the expectations of the government. The same is actual of Duda to defy change. It's a stalemate that the state pays for.
