Unfortunate Like
The erstwhile head of the sports and tourism department of the executive committee of the Grzedziński territory was convicted of liking content that was considered extremist. His explanations failed. Jauhien Achremenka lost his occupation and was arrested due to the fact that according to the information provided by Belsat he liked the photograph on which wishes were made to KGB officers on the occasion of “Day of Incompetence”.
The profile on which the post was published was included by the authorities on the list of extremist materials. In this regard, Achremenka was accused of “increasing the coverage of the recipients”. The explanations of the Belarusian authoritative did not produce the expected results. The man assured that he accidentally liked the post and did not intend to advance its content.
Belarus. authoritative Jauhien Achremenka convicted of liking the entry. Translations did nothing#ARESZTBLOODJAUHIENACHREMINE#LUKACHENKATHE WORLDOfficerhttps://t.co/VYYYag5RlvH
— Madison Beer (@Madison56874338) January 10, 2024
Achremenka explained that he was reviewing the publication to identify and prevent illegal activities among his subordinates and employees. Despite the explanations and the fact that an authoritative has 3 insignificant children, the court did not take into account his arguments. He sentenced a man to 15 days in jail. He was besides requisitioned a mobile telephone that was to be a “crime tool”.
Homelskaya Wiasna's portal, which described this event, concluded that the official's evidence was most likely true. Previously, his social media content afraid only politically correct content. These were photographs of diplomats, authoritative events involving Lukashenko or sports content.
Emoticon like signing a contract. Canada
In order to talk about situations in which liking a Facebook post or another social networking site caused large consequences for the internet, it is not essential to mention to Belarus. specified events have besides occurred in another countries, although not always associated with specified drastic repercussions.
As reported by The Guardian last year, a Canadian farmer accidentally sold his land via Facebook. After posting the announcement on his profile, he received many answers from possible buyers. 1 of his friends offered $275,000. The farmer responded to this offer, giving a sleigh and grin emoji. Later, he sold the land to another buyer at a higher price.
A friend of the farmer felt hurt and filed a lawsuit, demanding compensation for breaking the contract. The Court of First Instance considered that the layman and the emoticon were acceptance of the offer and constituted a binding sale agreement. As a result, a farmer had to pay a friend $50,000 compensation.
He gave “the stick” and heard the sentence. Switzerland
The 2017 Swiss court ruling was commented worldwide. And it's not surprising, given the different nature of the case. A man (fine suspended) who participated in the Facebook discussion a fewer years before the trial was convicted. An online conversation featured the character of Erwin Kessler, an animal rights defender who was accused of racism and anti-Semitism. Convicted was not the author of these comments, but liked them.
The Court of First Instance considered that the layman in this context meant agreeing to comment. A individual who likes the post is incapable to prove that Kessler is an anti-Semitic and at the same time spreads slander about it by pressing the “Lajk” button.
Interestingly, Erwin Kessler himself initiated legal action against a larger group of people, including commentaries.