Biometric data utilized to track citizens and capture emotions, social coordination (acting within the social credit strategy — classification of people based on their social behaviour, socio-economic status, individual characteristics) or criminal predictiveness (typing individuals who may commit a crime) are tools of artificial intelligence that successfully usage Chinese authorities to control citizens. Fortunately, they will be banned in the European Union, and all thanks to the AI Act, the world's first specified extended legal regulation concerning the operation and usage of artificial intelligence.
Since the 1950s, work has been underway on artificial intelligence. In fresh years and even months, its improvement has accelerated considerably. make SI or cloud solutions are utilized in different areas of the economy. Artificial intelligence has become a general intent technology. It can be utilized in any sector or aspect of our lives. That is why it is so crucial and urgent to bring it into the legal framework. In the world, the approach to this issue is very different, as we have already written about in the column “What's next with AI? Will the European Union regulate the operation of artificial intelligence?"
For the European Union, the improvement of technology must be in line with the European values as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
The proposal for horizontal regulation is pioneering. In the course of the long legislative process on 14 June 2023, the European Parliament approved the draft AI Act in its authoritative position.

Tripartite negotiations on the final text between the European Parliament, the European Commission and the associate States are already ongoing. There is simply a chance that the AI Act will be adopted before the next European Parliament elections scheduled for May 2024.
Among the EU's bodies, there is simply a large determination and a will to adopt it for the remainder of this term.The rapporteurs were appointed as well-functioning politicians.
The European Union does not want to regulate all systems based on artificial intelligence, but those which pose a risk. The rule of hazard assessment utilizing the alleged risk-based approach has been leading in legislative processes at European Union level for respective years. In this case, it has besides been applied.
The classification of high-risk areas has been extended to include harm to human health, safety, fundamental rights or the environment. AI providers will be forced to warrant the protection of fundamental rights, wellness and safety, the environment, democracy and the regulation of law.
Unfortunately, the European Parliament has not introduced rules that would defend migrants' rights against discriminatory surveillance systems and can facilitate illegal referrals or profiling of persons in a discriminatory way.
Despite leaving any gaps in the AI Act, the fresh law is an crucial step forward in protecting our fundamental rights. It gives hope for better regulation and liable usage of artificial intelligence, beginning the way for further improvements and adjustments in the future.
[1] Statements of 9 March 2022 – Dentons.com