B.Ratter: It is more about building a social climate of permissiveness
date:30 January 2025 Editor: Editorial
The amendments to Poland's abortion government adopted on 27 April 1956 were forced by the decree of the ultimate Council of the USSR of 23 November 1955, which allowed the anticipation of abortion without restrictions in the first 3 months of its duration.

This, of course, crossed off the erstwhile activities of the Minister of Health, while expanding the powers of parliamentary committees, of which 2 – legislative and labour and wellness issues – were obliged to rapidly prepare government without the existing legislative path. This was a curiosity situation, since the authorities withdrew professional ethics from their medical studies programs but did not suspend any of the codex rules, and these were very strict in respect of life. It was essential to mention to court practice, which pointed to the alleged situational ethics on circumstantial issues.(Katrzyna Jarkiewicz Position of the medical community on abortion problem (1956–1966).
70 years later, precisely specified actions were officially announced and implemented by Prime Minister Donald Tusk (now in cooperation with the Minister of wellness and another vaginas) – "I will break the law on changes in the justice system" – at the request of the Communist authorities of the European Union and the communist rulers of the planet from Davos (Klaus Szwab- sensational movie
It is clear that Ms Joanna Szczepkowska read only the instructions from the card announcing “the end of communism” in Poland, as Minister Barbara Nowack did by reading from the card that “Polish Nazis built camps”. Both instructions have the same source. And it is adequate to read both cognition from the “inclusive education” of Minister Barbara Nowacka.
Accordingly, government cardinal Jerzy Sawicki (Izidor Reisler) began a propaganda action to recognise social indications as an extension guide for the usage of abortion procedure by doctors. Jerzy Sawicki proposed setting up social committees at workplaces, which in the interests of the public and the stakeholders themselves would find whether there were alleged social conditions for abortion. Thus, the Stalinist prosecutor allowed a discussion about legislative changes not so much in the implementation of state policies, but allegedly at the request of citizens and in consequence to their demands. However, there is no evidence to propose that discussions in the media or in the press of letters from readers actually translated into the form of a bill. Rather, it was about building a climate of social consent. (Katarzyna Jarkiewicz )
70 years later, Minister Bodnar, the equivalent of the Communist prosecutor, does not even let for the discussion of legislative changes to "the implementation of the state policy" only at the Stalinist pace breaks the law - at the request of the communist superiors from the EU WHO UNICEF and the ruler of the planet from Davos- and only a model of Stalinist plans a law on the hatred speech "to build a climate of social affluence".
What is more, Minister Nowacka, who, like the Stalinist prosecutor, allowed "social consultations" conducted by an external IBE (worth knowing the composition of the staff) who designed revolutionary changes in the programming base in Polish schools (the consultation was someway hidden and few), "there is no evidence that discussions in the media or letters from opponents of impropriety and permissive sexualisation (not published in the press) actually translated into the form of a bill".
Katarzyna Jarkiewicz: The explanation of late humanization of the fetus that there is no abortion erstwhile the doctor breaks the pregnancy in the early stage, due to the fact that it does not kill a man, but removes unnecessary parts from the mother's body. This curiosity explanation could be utilized in the plan of a law amending abortion laws due to the fact that Stalin's law took the subjectivity of the unborn child. This explanation was developed by French feminist Madeleine Pelletier, who, in her book L’ Émancipation sexuelle de la femme, advocated the treatment of fetuses as part of the body, and demanded the right to “remove them like hair or nails”. Her position was supported in Poland by Tadeusz Boy-Żeleński.( F. Gordon, Convergence and Conflict: Anthropology, Psychiatry and Feminism in the Early Writings of Madeleine Pelletier (1874–1939).
Over 70 years have passed, and this "back argument" is utilized by Prime Minister Donald Tusk with vaginas and communist (stalinian) propaganda women - as instructed by the WHO and the 2030 UN Sustainable improvement Agenda.
Katarzyna Jarkiewicz: Opponents of these solutions paid attention to the heroic, not hedonist attitude of Poles who have been fighting the depopulation since the end of the war, and thanks to their determination the number of medical and care facilities aimed at helping their parent and kid increased. The state clearly did not follow the social interest, ignoring demands for improving the surviving conditions of families, and was de facto liable for the disastrous situation of women who wanted to become mothers.( Katarzyna Jarkiewicz )
Over 70 years have passed, and the state is inactive not guided by the social interest and does not fight depopulation but supports it, fulfilling the demands of the rulers of the planet (they educate and reproduce due to the fact that the existence of 2 sexes is indisputable and individual must regulation this world).
During the Bolshevik Revolution, a “new woman” was born, portrayed as “heroin of the revolution”. She lost her sexuality, was modern and firm. It all points to the fact that “the liberation of a woman” has always been limited by the interests of the communist party. The female did not be for herself, but to service the party, and at best prove the rightness of the party's axiological assumptions. (Mariusz Mazur, “New Man” in Tsarsk Russia and the russian Union until the 1930s, 2008).
Nothing changed in 2025. Donald Tusk's vaginas and NGOs are filled with “heroins of revolution” . Unfortunately, it is not a "revolution of common sense" but we, as citizens of the Republic of Poland, have lost our sanity by agreeing to it.
Will we defend the next generation by snatching them from the hands of powerful media controlled by “world rulers” and defending conventional values, including education equipping them with nonsubjective cognition that will let them to keep dignity and common sense in the future?
Israeli historians Gutman and Shmuel Krakowski explain that “the unquestionable fact is the presence of Jews in the highest circles of communist power. They worked in “administration, press, radio, and literature and culture. judaic communists held advanced positions in the military and safety apparatus. They came from the Red Army, among russian and Communist guerrillas in Poland, and even erstwhile prisoners of Nazi concentration camps. The authorities accepted a comparatively large number of Jews into their apparatus due to the fact that they encountered difficulties in uncovering adequate suitable candidates among the Polish intelligence, which was decimated during the war, and those who survived, emigrated, treated the authorities with reserve or were openly hostile to them. (I. Gutman, S. Krakowski, Uneąual Fictims. Poles and Jews During planet War Two, fresh York 1986).
I did. In 2025, Donald Tusk gave a speech to the European Parliament as the leader of the “European State” in which “the presence of the EU's communist power, the press, the radio, and the fields related to the literature and culture of judaic communists” erstwhile controlled by Lenin, present by the guru of Davos, Klaus Swab and promoting his large Reset in comic books, books, debates, films - Juwal Noach Harari. While Madeleine Pelletier in 1912 postulated the treatment of fetuses as parts of the body and demanded “to dispose of them as hair or nails cut off.” Juwal Noach Harari demands that man be treated as an animal. Does it want to get free of it as a “rock of the planet” in its entirety?
What about the government of Poland in 2025? Has nothing changed since Stalinism? Do we inactive have “the difficulty in uncovering adequate suitable candidates among the Polish intelligence that was decimated during the war, and those who survived, emigrated, treat the authorities with reserve or are openly hostile to them?
Finally, any of the Polishized Jews and Poles of judaic origin actively opposed the communists, even by participating in the underground of independence. Louis Fiedler, “acted in the right-wing underground” and after the war “has taken a advanced position in the region authorities”. He collected intelligence for the underground, among another things, he most likely provided a list of judaic communists who confounded their names and acted as “Aryans”. Fiedler's been arrested. His defender was a Polish Christian, while prosecutor Rumpler, a judaic communist, ruthlessly attacked him. "The process lasted 1 day and Louis was sentenced to 15 years of hard work". While in Fiedler's prison, he was abused. There was no mercy for Jews who were hostile to communism, and in peculiar to those associated with the underground of independence.(Marek Jan Chodakiewicz Doom).
Oh, my God.