B. Ratter: All statehood is exempt from morality ...

St. Joseph Sebastian Pelczar in 1884 spoke of the demolition of the Church:

In the field of science, almost all skills were utilized to fight religion; criticism was utilized to show that Christianity had taken its origin from Budaism, it was from parsism, it was from Talmud, or Greek-Roman mythology; geology, astronomy, chronology were utilized to bring lies to the Bible, and especially the cosmogony of Moses; past was utilized to represent in a gross light the actual or imaginary abuse of church power; it was utilized primarily of doctrine and natural sciences to refute the very fundamental truths, specified as the existence of God, freedom of will, spirituality, and immortality of the soul. (Conferences “About the Causes of Unbelief in Our Time” Kraków1884 )

Felix Koneczny in 1938 :

From the very beginning, then, the question of the alleged resurrection of Christianity by Protestantism arises. He promoted Luther from the beginning a religion without priests, without priests. What makes you think that? Islam did not know; he only knew Jews who had been without priests for 1450 years. Thus, Lutheranism without priests takes place in the judaic resemblance, and Calvinism subsequently took over. They are the leaders, advisers of the municipality, as experts; in which there is harmony with Judaism again, due to the fact that rabbis are only legal advisers, but not priests. In Jews, the head of the household becomes a priest for a Sabbath evening. Already in 1520 Luther gave a dissertation where he breaks up with the sacrament of priesthood: there is no fundamental difference between laymen or priests, princes or bishops, here at all between -how to express average - clergymen and laymen, due to the fact that there is only a difference of office or kind of occupation, but not of state. For they are all a spiritual state, actual priests, bishops, and popes, although they are devoted to various activities. (Felix Coneczny Protestant in Social Life Warsaw 1938)

The revolution and attack on the Church continues as an ideology that continues to usage the same teachings and methods as St.Jozef Sebastian Pelczar wrote about and now has modern technologies in the 21st century, which easy manipulates human minds and emotions. Let us stand by the clergy, who - as their predecessors in the 1000 years of Christian past of the Republic continued with large dedication - are in the Church of Christ, which Fr Tadeusz Guz says:

The Church of Christ, who is on earth, expresses his worship of the most holy 1 saving sacrifice of suffering the passion of the cross of death, but besides the resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ. Over the centuries, the Church has sought specified figures of the liturgical rite in the spoken word, music compositions besides in gestures or moments of silence, so that in the most perfect manner as for the widely understood culture of man on earth it is possible to aid to experience the experience of gathering Christ - the only mediator between God the Father and us. The care of the church should be to give and lead ourselves as clergy and God's people in specified a form as to be the most perfect form.. (p. prof. Tadeusz Guz)

Paweł Lisicki (chief editor of DoRzeczy) in his book “The Exile of Melchizedek” besides writes about the demolition of the priesthood. If, alternatively of recognizing Mass as a sacrifice, we talk of Mass as a remembrance of the supper, as a supper, as a gathering showing love, a community - then an component of the community of the congregation even begins to deny and replace in consciousness what is most crucial and what belongs to the identity of the priest or Eucharistic sacrifice. If it goes out of consciousness, the essence of the priesthood dies. He can be the organizer of the meeting, the administrator, the excellent speaker, he can organize the community around him. (Paweł Lisicki)

During the conference in Białystok, Fr. Prof. Waldemar Chrostowski said:

This is the problem, is it possible to look at the planet through the eyes of the Revelation of God, through the eyes of the Holy Scriptures, through the eyes of the fresh Testament, through the eyes of Jesus Christ, or can we diagnose what is happening, what is being proposed to us – in the Christian language that has existed for 2000 years?

Or for our own needs, for the credibility of this revolution or for the intent of softening it, we begin to relativize and effort to reinterpret Revelation and tradition. An example is the translation of the text that the Pontifical Bible Commission published a fewer years ago, which addressed, among others, the subject of homosexuality, the clarification assessed in many places of the Bible. What is simply a reinterpretation that adapts to what the planet is pushing and entering the Church? In explaining to the Pontifical Bible Commission that the statements on the Old and fresh Testament pages were culturally, socially, conditions that prevailed at that time-to-day we look at these problems differently! And what the Pontifical Bible Commission on Sodom and Gomorrah says - the sin of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah was a sin of deficiency of hospitality - that is another reason to care for migrants (sic!)

There have always been different revolutions in the world, different trends and options, different ways and mechanisms of propaganda – the problem arises and grows erstwhile they penetrate into the Church. Let us defend those who do not replace reason, faith, knowledge, thinking, emotions, etc. with ideology and defend us from it.

Felix Cone: The second time Luther became active in Judaism, erstwhile he justified the famed bigamy of the landgraf of Heski Philip with Old Testament examples. Each patriarch of the Old Order had more seriousness for Luther than "a 100 1000 popes." And which 1 of them lived in union? Luther had the rightness that polygamy is not contrary to Scripture, but... if we halt at the Old Order.

Melanchton formulated the substance more specifically and more originalally, in his opinion given in August 1531, that for the king(Henry VIII) due to the fact that he is simply a king - it is possible to let bigamy, since the interests of the kingdom and the peace of conscience of the king himself require it. So if the pope does not give a divorce, he can take a second wife without sin. He besides points out that polygamy is not forbidden by God’s law. That's what all rabbi will say today. ...At the bottom of all of this lies the conviction of the request for 2 morals. Quotes from Luther’s writings have shown long ago that he did not require morality from governments. Private morality is different and public life is different. As a result, it had to appear, as any statehood is exempt from morality towards citizens. The regulation of ethics to private life came from Protestantism. (Felix Coneczny Protestant in Social Life Warsaw 1938)

Oh, my God.

Smoke: eKAI