Grażyna / Zewedy attack

publixo.com 1 month ago

Grażyna has always been politically active. Since the election was won by the PiS in 2015, she has been a frequent associate in protests and demonstrations organized by the Committee for the defence of Democracy. She disagreed with the policy of the government, which she felt violated the constitution, restricted the freedom of the media and courts, and violated the rights of women and minorities. Grażyna felt that PiS threatened democracy and European values, so she decided to fight for a better, more smiling Poland.

One day, she learned that the PiS organization with the participation of Jarosław Kaczyński was to be held in her town. Grażyna felt anger and frustration. She decided she couldn't stay passive and she had to do something. She brought the flag of the European Union, a banner with “Constitution” and a bottle of gasoline. She dressed in black, put on sunglasses and a hat. She left for the rally.

When she reached the square, she saw a crowd of people dressed in white and red colors. She heard the cry “Out with the Union”, “Out with Tusk”, “Out with the PO”. She saw the scene where Jarosław Kaczyński stood and gave the speech. He talked about how the Law and Justice Office defends Polish sovereignty, how it implements the 500 plus program, how it builds the Central Communication Port. Grażyna felt sick. She couldn't stand what she heard.

It broke through a crowd of people holding the EU flag and banner. erstwhile she was close to the scene, she pulled out a bottle of gasoline and lit a wick. She threw it towards Jarosław Kaczyński, shouting “Get out of the PiS”. The bottle exploded right next to the leader of the ruling party, starting the fire. People on phase panicked. Jarosław Kaczyński was burned and wounded with shrapnel of glass and then immediately evacuated by security.

Grażyna tried to escape, but was rapidly captured by the police. She was charged with attempted execution and arson. She was facing life. In the media, she was portrayed as a terrorist and a threat to national security. Many people condemned her actions and demanded severe punishment.

However, not all were against Grażyna. any considered her a hero and a symbol of opposition against the authoritarian PiS regime. They organized solidarity actions and raised money to defend it. They claimed that Grazyna acted in the name of democracy and freedom.

Grażyna did not regret what she did. She felt it was her work as a Polish citizen. She was willing to bear the consequences of her act. She believed that 1 day past would justice her fairly.

The effects of the Grażyna attack were very serious. Not only did it origin injury to Jarosław Kaczyński, but it besides caused a wave of tensions and political and social conflicts in Poland. any of them are:

Increase in support of the PiS. The ruling organization utilized the assassination of its leader to unify its election base and gain public sympathy. The Law and Justice presented themselves as the victim of aggression and the assassination of democracy. In the PiS polls, he gained respective percent points and strengthened his position as the largest political force in the country.

Escalation of repression against the opposition. After Grażyna's attack, the PiS introduced a state of emergency and tightened anti-terrorist law. Many people associated with the Committee for the Defence of Democracy, the Civic Platform, the Left, as well as independent media and NGOs have been arrested, questioned or intimidated. The PiS accused the opposition of complicity in the assassination and attempted to overthrow the legally elected government.

The division of society. Grażyna's attack deepened the division between supporters and opponents of PiS. Many expressed their emotions and views on the streets, on social media and in private conversations. There have been many incidents of hatred, force and discrimination. Poland has become a divided and conflicted country.

Grażyna was sentenced to life imprisonment by the territory court in Katowice. The court found her guilty of attempted execution of Jarosław Kaczyński and arson. The court found that Grazyna acted in cold blood and with premeditation and that her actions posed a threat to the safety of the state and public order. The court rejected the arguments of the defence that claimed that Grażyna was insane and acted under the influence of emotion. The court besides failed to take into account mitigating circumstances specified as age, wellness position and the absence of erstwhile crimes of Grażyna.

Grażyna appealed her judgement to the appeal court, but her appeal was dismissed. She so brought an action before the Constitutional Court, but the Court rejected its action as unfounded. She besides referred to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, but the Court did not accept her case.

Grażyna was to spend the remainder of her life in a maximum safety prison. She had no chance of parole or pardon. She was considered 1 of the most dangerous and hated prisoners in Poland.

The reactions of members of the Democratic Defence Committee to the conviction of Grażyna were different. any of them expressed their outrage and solidarity with Grazyna. They thought she was a victim of an unfair and politically controlled trial. They claimed that Grażyna acted in defence of democracy and the constitution, and that her act was an act of desperation and protest against the authoritarian PiS regime. They organized pickets, marches and collected signatures under the petition for the release of Grażyna.

Other members of the Defence Committee of Democracy cut off from Grażyna and condemned her actions. They believed that she had crossed the line of law and morality, and that her attack on Jarosław Kaczyński was a terrorist and violent act. They claimed it damaged the origin of democracy and divided society. They called for a peaceful and civilized fight against the Law and Dialogue.

Still another members of the Committee for the defence of Democracy were indecisive or indifferent to Grażyna's fate. They thought that she had made a mistake and had consequences, but did not want to engage in her case. They focused on another problems and actions of the Committee on Democracy Defence. They refused to talk publically about Grażyna or her conviction.

The reactions of another political parties to Grażyna's conviction were varied depending on their ideological orientation and relation to the Law and Justice. The following attitudes can be distinguished:

Support for Grażyna's conviction. This was the attitude taken by parties who were allies or sympathizers of the Law and Justice, specified as Solidarna Polska, the Agreement, the Right of the Republic or the Confederation. They believed that Grażyna was a terrorist and deserved severe punishment. They claimed that her attack was an effort to execution Jarosław Kaczyński and a threat to national security. They expressed solidarity with the Law and Justice and condemned the opposition for supporting Grażyna.

Criticism of Grażyna's conviction. This attitude was taken by parties who were opposed or critical of the Law and Justice, specified as the Civic Platform, the Left, Modern and Polish People's Party. They felt that Grażyna was the victim of an unfair and politically controlled trial. They claimed that her act was an act of desperation and protest against the authoritarian PiS regime. They pointed to the disproportionateity of the punishment and the deficiency of consideration of mitigating circumstances. They demanded the release of Grazyna and the regulation of law.

Neutrality or silence on the conviction of Grazyna. This was the attitude taken by parties who did not want to engage in or have no clear position on this controversial matter. These were regional, number or sectoral parties specified as the German National Minority, the Silesian Autonomy Movement, and the Trade Union of Agriculture “Self-defense”. They avoided commenting on the judgement and dealt with another problems and actions.

Thus, it can be concluded that Grażyna's conviction caused political division and deepened antagonisms between parties. any parties supported Grażyna's conviction as an act of justice and defence of the state, others criticized them as an act of injustice and political repression. inactive others did not want to talk about it or did not have a clear opinion.

Grażyna's destiny in prison was very difficult. She was isolated from another prisoners, subjected to frequent revisions and control, and exposed to harassment and force by guards and fellow prisoners. Grażyna had no support or contact with family, friends or lawyer. She was besides deprived of access to media, books, letters or phones. She suffered from depression, insomnia and anxiety. She had no hope of improving her situation.

Grażyna tried to commit suicide respective times, but each time she was thwarted by guards or doctors. She was subjected to forced psychiatric and pharmacological treatment to break her will and personality. Grażyna was influenced by strong drugs that disturbed her perception and memory. She lost her sense of identity and reality.

The public's reaction to the destiny of Grazyna in prison was divided. any people felt that she deserved severe punishment and suffering due to the fact that she tried to kill Jarosław Kaczyński and threatened the safety of the state. They felt that she was a terrorist, and she should not be felt sorry for or helped. any of them even sent letters to her with threats, insults, and names.

Other people believed that Grażyna was the victim of an unfair and politically controlled trial. They believed that she acted in defence of democracy and the constitution, and that her act was an act of desperation and protest against the authoritarian PiS regime. They felt that she should not be isolated and tortured in prison, but should receive intellectual and legal assistance. any of them tried to contact her by sending her letters of support, solidarity and hope.

Still another people were indifferent or uninterested in the destiny of Grażyna in prison. They thought she had made a mistake and had consequences, but they refused to engage in her case. They focused on another problems and things of their lives. They refused to talk publically about Grażyna or her conviction.

Thus, it can be said that Grażyna's destiny in prison caused various emotions and opinions in society. any people were for her, others against her, and others had no opinion. There was no uniform social reaction to the conviction of Grażyna.

US president Joe Biden condemned Grażyna's conviction as an act of injustice and political repression. He stated that Grażyna was a victim of an authoritarian PiS government that violated the constitution, restricted media freedom and the courts, and violated the rights of women and minorities. Biden called for the release of Grażyna and the regulation of law and democracy in Poland. Biden besides announced the imposition of sanctions on Poland for violation of human rights and European values.

Russian president Vladimir Putin expressed his support for the conviction of Grazyna as an act of justice and defence of the state. He stated that Grażyna was a terrorist and tried to kill Jarosław Kaczyński and endanger the national safety of Poland. Putin praised the interior and abroad policies of the Law and Justice and expressed the Kremlin's solidarity. Putin besides criticized the European Union for interfering with Poland's interior affairs and trying to impose its values.

China's leader Xi Jinping retained neutrality or silence on the conviction of Grazyna. He did not make any authoritative message on the subject, nor did he comment on it publicly. China did not want to engage in this controversial substance or did not have a clear position on it. China focused on another problems and activities, specified as the organisation of the Winter Olympics and the improvement of economical cooperation with Russia. However, China stressed the importance of dialog and cooperation between Poland and another European countries

Grażyna spent more than 10 years in prison. She has not experienced any political or social change in Poland. She besides had no pardon. She died in prison of a heart attack, alone and forgotten.
Read Entire Article