We defend kids online? After the gathering of the Sejm committee, the conclusions come to light. "David v. Goliath"

On Tuesday, June 3rd, the Polish Parliament held a joint gathering of the Digital Affairs Commission and the Committee on Children and Youth, which was expected to be a step towards improving the safety of the youngest net users. How was it in reality? Magdalena Bigaj did not dress up in words: Supporting companies that deny facts is insulting to citizens and citizens.
The starting point for the discussion was the "Children's Internet" study prepared by Aleksandra Załęska, Marcin Pergo (Gemius) and social activist Magdalena Bigaj, who took the level during the meeting. This paper reveals the dramatic scale of kid sexual abuse and cyber force on the Polish net (see: This is what children do online. The latest data is shocking. It is not social media that is the biggest problem). Data from reliable sources, including Interpol, the Foundation We give the Children Power and Gemius, clearly indicate that children under the age of 13 are widely utilizing social media, communicators and gaming platforms despite formal bans and regulations.

RECLAMA


See the video by Anna Wendzikowska before she was on tv she worked in call center. "No work I fear"


Bigtech says clearly: Children do not concern us
Representatives of bigtech: Meta and Google were invited to the gathering to address, among others, the issue of ensuring the safety of children utilizing the platforms of their companies.
In her social media, activist Magdalena Bigaj commented. In her opinion, 1 of the most outrageous statements was that of Google's representative, Zakrzywska Jagoda. "She denied that YT is simply a social platform". According to Bigaj YouTube, it has features that let the service to be considered 1 of the social media platforms. "You can have your profile there, compose comments and that makes pathostreamers have immense communities of children". The youngest users, on the another hand, are to "pay 'donates' in exchange for adding to the observed".
Meta, on the another hand, admits that the company does not have a policy to defend children under the age of 13 because, according to the regulations, children should not usage their products. - Do you realize what happened there? This female confirmed that Meta does not have a kid protection policy, due to the fact that according to Meta, children