Antihuman Concepts of the Santa Fe Institute

.

From the ban on the usage of cash to the handling of breeding – traces of the conference at the Institute of Complexity in Santa Fe.

.

The fight for conventional values, which we see in many countries, only formally looks like a revolt against modernity. This is simply a fight for your essence. After all, material factors of production, not spiritual and informational, will be the main object of post-capitalism. Ultra-globalists aim not only to make a convenient post-capitalism on a global scale, but besides to restart history, turning most of the planet's population into social animals.

The biggest threat to the modern planet is not demography, not climate, not energy, according to a number of reports, publications... This is all very important, but the most crucial and dangerous for the modern planet is the social disaster which the leaders of planet capitalist systems organized to bring capitalism to a fresh stage, post-capitalistic.

And it happens on different levels. Top versus bottom, top versus middle. The fight at the top of the various regional groups, clan groups and various forms of organization has besides intensified. For example, financiers against industry, self-sufficient (alternative, self-employed (?)- Fursov uses this ambiguous word Existas, – PZ) against corporations. In another words, a developing social disaster is simply a transition to a fresh social system.

This is all very akin to what happened in Europe from the mid-15th to mid-17th century, erstwhile a fresh strategy was created on the ruins of the erstwhile system. And this threat is the most dangerous. There's another danger here. Since material factors of production, and spiritual, informational factors – or needs, values, the determination of goals by man – will not be the main object of post-post-capitalistic society, then the spiritual sphere becomes the object of possession.

At a conference in the US Institute of Complexities in Santa Fe
(See: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institut_Santa_Fe and even better: https://www.santafe.edu/ – PZ)

The ultra-globalists have presented the following objectives that they want to accomplish within 10-15 years:

1. The abolition of private and individual property.

2. Common basic income for those who have accepted "new normality".

3. Removing cash and replacing it with digital currency.

(I will add from myself: Digital currency is not money, but a means of social control.)

4. Hydrocarbon rating strategy for states and corporations.

5. Close social control (cams on the streets, digitalisation).

6. Ratification of food consumed, energy and natural resources.

7. Patents for seed and restrictions on the anticipation to consume own food products.

8. Attack on cattle farming. Transfer of most populations to artificial protein foods or vegetarian foods.

(I will add: in the Netherlands, in Haarlem since 2023, advertising of meat products and meat dishes in public places has been banned. Further – more: according to media reports, in October 2022 a decision was made in the Netherlands forced to buy 600 cattle from their owners. We goodbye cattle breeding and high-quality protein foods.)

9. Birth control. (This is depopulation.)

10. Mandatory vaccinations.

11. natural restrictions on alternate forms of treatment.

12. Discussing (and subsequently abolishing) sex differences.

The second is nothing but a blow not only to the household but besides to man and humanity as a biological species. Engels erstwhile called his work on civilization in opposition to barbarism “The Origin of Family, Private Property and State”. The implementation of the “Objects...” involves the demolition of everything that created human civilization.

Institutionalized Neo-Barbarism

We're not just talking about taking possession of the spiritual sphere, but it becomes the main form of production relations, as the Marxist would say. Thus, the current conflict for conventional values, which takes place all over the world, only in terms of form, refers to the past – the conflict for a tradition against any modernity. This is simply a false approach. In fact, under the cover of fighting for conventional values begins to take form fundamentally fresh social, if you can say so, class conflict of post-post-pitalist society.

Ultra-globalists not only search to make a convenient post-capitalism on a global scale, but first to restart past in the form it has developed since the neo-lithic revolution, that is, for the last 10-12 1000 years, and to turn it towards institutionalized neo-barbarbarism, futuroarchism, secondly to control the evolution (socio-)biological, turn it and transform the majority of the planet's population into social animals without traits and identities.

Some say, “Well, why resist, bourgeoisie is strong anyway, it will win...” Well, first of all, it's not the fact that he's gonna win. Second, it's a shame not to face it. But there's 1 more thing, rather pragmatic. And past shows that this is precisely how everything happens in life. The fact is, not a single social strategy wins by knockout. It's always a compromise. The more teeth of the young predator are torn out by the opposition at different levels, the more peaceful and, to say the more human the fresh strategy will be.

Well, for example. There were 3 ways out of the feudalist crisis. English, German and French. England became a hegemon of the capitalist system, but the higher classes there crushed the lower classes so much that their lives even in the late 19th century was a nightmare. Neither France nor Germany became hegemons. They took their place, but they did not become hegemons. However, life of the lower and mediate layers on both German lands and since the late 19th century in united Germany and France was a government of magnitude easier and more comfortable than the lives of the British lower classes. due to the fact that in the 16th–XVII century, both German and French people actively resisted the emerging fresh strategy and ripped out many, many teeth from it.

Therefore, what we are seeing present in different countries is opposition to what is called progress. (As Jerzy Lec said: “If the cannibal starts utilizing forks and knives, will that be progress? ”) We don't request that kind of progress. And anyway, there's the fact of the social system, there's the fact of the historical entity, there's the human truth. And that's why if advancement doesn't fit in this truth, then to hell with it, with progress.

What precisely can a fresh social conflict mean? It's defending the conventional values, defending the right to privacy they want to deprive us of. The right to rise children as we wish. That means it's the right to be human.

Written by Andrei I. Fursow

SOURCE
https://www.business-gaseta.ru/article/597705

(PL)more