Reasonable concerns? Example of Beata Szydło
Initially, it was planned that these resolutions would be voted on at the first session of the fresh parliamentary word as a symbol of the changes made in the parliament. The opposition planned to vote on them on Tuesday during the second day of the inaugural session of the Sejm of the 10th term.
However, doubts arose as to whether these resolutions would be published at all. They should be included in the Polish Monitor, which is the authoritative official diary issued by the Prime Minister. Mateusz Morawiecki will have control over it for respective weeks. Although the publication of resolutions and another decisions is an work of the Prime Minister, in the past the Law and Justice have already ignored the regulations in this area.
Dubler's not a judge, so we'll see.
Eight years of lawlessness in the institutions of the state, and today, how about a law enforcement?
Yes, it will be followed by law and after 8 years of this legislative bandit Ziobry will pass the roller and level.
The only thing left to the Akolytes is to cry.
— Mixon (@MixonOli) November 13, 2023
Examples do not request to be looked far, due to the fact that Beata Szydło, during the period erstwhile she was Prime Minister, held back the publication of respective judgments of the Constitutional Court for many months.
Will the publication be ignored again?
One associate of the Civic Coalition expressed concerns that there might be a repetition of the situation in which the Prime Minister would ignore the work to print resolutions. Members are considering different options, but are not certain that it is possible to vote on resolutions at this point.
The full situation has its roots in October 2015 during the last session of the 7th Parliament. At that time, Members of the PO-PSL, who were then a majority, elected 5 judges of the Constitutional Court by means of parliamentary resolutions. This choice was possible thanks to the fresh Constitutional Court Act of June 2015. This part of government allowed the 7th Sejm to elect fresh judges, even though their word of office was to begin after the 2015 parliamentary elections.
So completely between us, if you can introduce the concept to modern categories of law Judge Dubbler 😉 is why you can't CitizenDubler – in Reich, it was called #Untermensch and was rather freely and eagerly introduced
— Milosz Lodowski 🇵🇱 💯 (@miloszlodowski) November 10, 2023
After the elections in which the majority won the Law and Justice, the fresh Sejm immediately proceeded to make changes in the Constitutional Court. Parliament amended the Constitutional Tribunal Act, allowing, among others, the re-election of judges. During the night of 25 to 26 November 2015, the PiS organization annulled resolutions that led to the election of judges during the erstwhile term.
2 December 2015, The Sejm elected Henryk Cioch, Lech Morawski, Mariusz Muszyński, Piotr Pszczółkowski and Julia Przyłębska as judges of the Constitutional Court. However, the Constitutional Court, chaired by Andrzej Rzeplinski, ruled that the provision that allowed the selection of 3 judges during the 7th word was in accordance with the Constitution. For this reason, those chosen later should not sit in the Court.
The judges elected to the place of judges elected by the erstwhile Sejm are Cioch, Morawski and Muszyński. The first 2 died in 2017, while their seats were taken by Jarosław Wyrembak and Justin Piskorski. It is Muszyński, Wyrembak and Piskorski who are now referred to as “dublers”.
The 10th word of office is to resume work on Tuesday at 4 p.m. talker of the Sejm Simon Holovnia announced that during the block of votes Members would elect, among others, secretaries of the Sejm, parliamentary members of the National Judicial Council, the composition of the Committee on Rules of Procedure, Members' Affairs and Immunities, and will find the number of members of the Parliamentary Committee on peculiar Services.
