In the election run for the Office of the president of the Republic of Poland, Prime Minister D. Tusk tried to save his candidate R.Trzaskowski on a broadcast conducted by ed. Rymanowski. In criticism of the candidate against the camp, he cited the opinion given by the criminal. Of course, it was a negative opinion, depicting the candidate of the opposing camp as a ,generally speaking a criminal. The Prime Minister believed but his election candidate lost, any commentators even claimed that it was Tusk's responsibility who repeated the heard, "under the name" information of the criminal.
Almost 3 months later, the A.R. criminal - the place of residence of the prisoner, the conviction of 6 years besides "under the name" stated that the current Euro MP D.Joński accepted from him the property benefits of tremendous value. What he told A.R. reporter on the portal Goniec.pl.- "I'll tell you 1 thing. He published a book on the fight against corruption, right? There's a image on the cover that a prominent photographer Chris Niedenthal took. In this photo, Mr. Darek has the cover of Tom Ford's glasses, and he has a suit purchased with my money, from a guy named Sz., a tailor-made tailor. According to his account, he financed the MP buying a mobile phone, coffee machine, the glasses mentioned above and a suit. He besides financed trips and abroad trips and free usage of the car. No specified asset benefits were found by editors in the mandatory registry of MP Joński.
The performance of this current Euro MP in a duet with another Euro MP Szczerba is well known. In addition to the fact that they were supplying pizza to mediocre refugees persecuted by the Law and Justices, they detected so much corruption in this formation that the courts kept up with the passing of sentences on "organized criminal groups" of politicians of the United Right.
I have a question for Prime Minister Tusk, will he believe what the criminal said about a associate of his formation, awarded a occupation in Brussels? We know the Prime Minister is simply a wise man who besides has the gift of logical thinking. Logic indicates that this peculiar criminal compared to the 1 the Prime Minister had previously believed is truthful. In this case, it would be pointless to lie without any benefit. If he had accused any writer, then his chances of regaining his freedom would have been great, but accusing a typical of the ruling coalition of specified chances is not. I'm waiting for the Prime Minister's reaction!
https://www.liil.eu/promujnotke
