- W 1 of us described Polish Real property Holding jobs (PHN), a state office management company in the largest cities of the country. Appointed in April 2024 as president of Wiesław Malicki, he regularly addressed employees in a vulgar way, shouted and humiliated the subordinates, reporting our sources knowing the situation in the company
- There should be control immediately, and if the charges are confirmed, specified a man should lose his position. There can be no consent to specified behaviours or any signs of mobbing, says Mr Komarevicz
- I will not talk for Prime Minister Tusk here, but as a coalitionist, I can say that the implementation of the electoral promises is besides slow,” he says about the announcement of the depoliticization of companies of the Treasury associate of Poland 2050
- More crucial information can be found on the Onetu homepage
Simon Piegza, Marcin Terlik: The president of the Polish Real property Holding was expected to talk to the subordinates, “all of you are going to fuck you”, “you can kiss me.”. Those who know the situation well told us that profanity and screaming became normal.
Rafał Komarevicz: If individual behaves this way towards employees, he should be punished and his action condemned. There's nothing to debate.
Remember, however, that these accusations request to be similar, due to the fact that we have a word against the word for now.
Ministry of State Acts, which supervises this Company of the Treasury, has already announced control.
Very good reaction. There should be control immediately, and if the charges are confirmed, specified a man should lose his position. There can be no consent to specified behaviour or any manifestation of mobbing.
What has drawn my peculiar attention to this communicative is the fact that during the conversation with you, the president of PHN said that this full case was any kind of contract for him. Let's be honest: if this man truly was a specialist on the market, he wouldn't be afraid of any assignments, due to the fact that he'd be certain that his work would defend itself. After these words, 1 can seriously consider whether this gentleman is truly a real property specialist.
Failure of the Company Retreat Act. “This is how it works and it is frightening”
You were the leader of the squad who prepared the Act on the suppression of companies of the Treasury.
Yes, and you know what amazed me most? That in state companies that are in restructuring, there are no willing to take up positions on boards and supervisory boards.
If people from organization broadcasting were real specialists, then they should search specified companies, due to the fact that that is where 1 can prove that specified a company can be brought straight. And there are actually the biggest staff shortages.
Why is that?
For 1 simple reason: there is no money in the company in restructuring and there are problems. That's how it works, and it's scary.
Tomaz Gzell / PAPRafał Komarevich
Your task late disappeared on the committee of parliament. Is there no depoliticisation of state companies?
It is possibly the only case in the past of legislative work of the parliament in fresh years that the bill is suspended. In practice, the draft was stuck in the committee. Even parliament legislators say they haven't met this situation.
What do you mean he's stuck?
It was not accepted due to the fact that the majority voted against the project. But he was besides not rejected due to the fact that no 1 had the courage to claim complete rejection.
And then what?
We have decided that if Members do not want to adopt the current law, we will work on a fresh law to set aside the companies of the Treasury. We already have the bill's skeleton and we're working on specifics.
In the erstwhile draft, you have stated that any members of the supervisory boards are to be appointed by an independent committee and that the remuneration of the company authorities is to be published in a peculiar registry on an ongoing basis. These ideas stay, or do you throw them in the trash?
Certainly any of the solutions we have proposed so far will remain. We will besides make any amendments. It must be admitted that there have been any substantive comments on the joint committee of our political opponents.
We want to introduce them and complete the project. Then we will give him a broad public consultation so that all Pole can express his opinion.
When can he be ready?
Soon, I think. So far, interior arrangements are underway. The procedure is that if we study the task to the talker of the Sejm, then the talker of the Sejm submits it for public consultation. net consultation lasts a period and we have the chance to make changes after them. It is only after this that the task goes to the first reading.
So no sooner than in a fewer months.
For us now, a broad public consultation will be the most important. We believe that the future of the companies of the State Treasury is not just a invention of Poland 2050, but it truly is in our common interest, all Pole.
The promise to separate companies was not realised. “You gotta ask Donald Tusk”
However, the destiny of your earlier task indicates that apart from your group, the remainder of the organization is not curious in repelling companies.
That's a good point. Note, however, that although the Ko, PSL and the Law and Justice have not voted with us, the same conviction as Poland 2050 is the Confederation or the Left. We can make it a cross-party project.
Why aren't the KOs, PSLs and Law and Justice interested?
It seems to me that the answer is very simple: previously the state-owned companies were casting PiS, and now our coalitions, namely KO and PSL, do so. The U.S.A. doesn't want any change, due to the fact that he most likely thinks they'll be back in power in 3 years. It's a beautiful sad constancy.
Paweł Supernak / PAPSimon Holovnia and Donald Tusk
Donald Tusk still, as opposition leader, wrote the depoliticization of companies as 1 of 100 government promises. It hasn't happened yet.
The company's detachment is not only 1 of the 100 specifics of the KO, but besides 1 of the crucial points of the coalition agreement between the 4 parties.
Have you been deceived?
What do you want me to say? surely you journalists have the right to ask politicians why coalitions are trying to block any changes that lead to the suppression of State Treasury companies.
In that case, we ask: does your leader, Simon Holovnia, ask Donald Tusk why KO is blocking the company's retreat?
I don't know.
It's been over a year since the coalition agreement was signed. This is as much time as possible to take this deal, go to Prime Minister Tusk and ask him what he managed to achieve.
Maybe he's not doing it due to the fact that he knows there's not quite a few promises he's made.
It is adequate to look at 100 particulars to say that this simply could not be done, due to the fact that in any cases it is essential to have a responsible, cooperative president, and it was known in October 2023 that this was impossible and this state would proceed until the presidential election.
Donald Tusk knowingly misled everyone?
I will not talk for Prime Minister Tusk here, but as a coalitionist I can say that the implementation of the electoral promises is going besides slowly.
You want to talk to the authors?
Write: == sync, corrected by elderman == ; == sync, corrected by elderman ==
