In this text I discuss an article from the river basin.pl portal, which I post at the end of the post.
The future U.S. Ambassador to Poland, Thomas Rose, repeats the rhetoric of the German Nazis, leading to the bleaching of the Germans for their crimes of planet War II.
This is how the river basin website shows us.pl
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion, due to the fact that it was in Poland that the Holocaust happened, it was "in any  way Poland is liable  for this".
– They were Nazis, they were Germans, they were their helpers. The Israelis must realize this better. And Poles request to realize Israeli sensitivity better," Rose said. As he added, he is very curious in reconciliation between the 2 countries and believes that he can service this.
From the above-edited statement, it does not indicate that he would deny the false circulatory opinion of the "wine" of Poles for the Holocaust. 
Furthermore, so formulated (first) conviction  as if it confirms a lying thesis. It's the word 'cause':
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion, due to the fact that it was in Poland that the Holocaust happened, it was "in any  way Poland is liable  for this".
The point is:
- Holocaust Germans implemented in Poland - which is simply a fact
- I'm sorry. The Holocaust Germany implemented in Poland - which is besides  Circulating opinion
- I'm sorry.  The Holocaust occurred in Poland is besides  true, only incomplete, does not explain the genesis and who is liable  for the Holocaust, but besides, virtually  - it is simply a fact
- in our view, the word  "circular opinion" refers to lies that Poles are guilty of the Holocaust, "circular opinion" does not necessarily should be based on truth, aau "circular opinion" CAN be based on truth.
Look carefully what it says.
According to the current opinion, due to the fact that it was in Poland that the Holocaust occurred, "in any  way Poland is liable  for this".
because it was in Poland that the Holocaust occurred, that "in any  way Poland is liable  for this".
because it was in Poland that the Holocaust happened, that "Poland is liable  for this".
The text is so edited that it follows from it that Rose confirms the lying thesis that " Poland is liable  for this"
In this conviction  the phrase "circular opinion" refers to fact, not lies, the word "because" tells us about it.
Polish Translator PWN:
because
«an introductory phrase that explains the information given in the second conviction  of the compound sentence, e.g. he left due to the fact that he was offended.»
Polish Translator PWN:
Information is simply a fact.
Instead of the word "because" should be: "if"
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion, since it was the Holocaust in Poland, "in any  way Poland is liable  for this".
Yeah?
Right?
I'm certain  that's correct, but that's a very short sentence.
Polish Translator PWN:
if
1. 
«an introductory phrase specifying the condition on which it can be concluded What is mentioned in the advanced   sentence, for example, must have been seriously sick  erstwhile   he died so young.”
2.
in the past, “a conjunctor introducing a insignificant  conviction  setting out the conditions for the occurrence, immediately after their rise, of the events referred to in the overarching sentence, e.g. erstwhile   they heard the mother's voice, they immediately returned home.”
In addition, this false thesis strengthens quotes - and again we do not know whether it is simply a quote from Rose, or a quote from a circular opinion, or a proposition  that the content in the sednislovak is false.
It could be like this:
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion "because it was in Poland that the Holocaust occurred, Poland is someway  liable  for this".
It's just that then this conviction  is kind of infinite, there's no explanation-- what happens next, what results, Because the conviction  starts with:"he stressed that according to," So we're expecting any  conclusion, any  definition, which is not there.
so the following conviction  is correct
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion, since it was the Holocaust in Poland, "in any  way Poland is liable  for this".
The word "because" refers to facts, and "if" indicates the origin  of something.
basins.pl does not usage  specified  miki for the first time, which was already described on the blog in the case of statements by president   Duda in Auschwitz.
The fact that any  Poles (and not only, due to the fact that besides  people of another  nationalities) were forced to execute  any  activities, e.g. in Auschwitz does not mean that Poles are liable  for the Holocaust.
No Pole is liable  for what decisions another Pole makes.
It is entirely inappropriate and unreasonable to place the full  city, or the full  village, or the full  nation liable  for the actions of individual persons. What is different, erstwhile   actions are initiated or taken by the authorities of a given country, then in global  relations work   - the consequences are borne by all citizens of that country, for example, erstwhile   their taxes pay reparations for causing war and all its consequences.
If I have been robbed by a Jew, does this mean that all Israelis are now to go to prison?
The decision on the Holocaust was taken by the German authorities - and Germany is the only 1  guilty of the Holocaust.
Meanwhile, Mr. Rose falsely separates the blame and details who he believes is responsible, so he fits into the rhetoric of this false "circular opinion"Which he seems to be trying to rectify.
Blame the Holocaust:
- Nazis.
- Germans
- their helpers
This is the repetition of the German thesis that the crimes of the Second planet War are liable for the undetermined Nazis - this thesis is intended to distract from Germany, and in time - as I have already written on the blog - shift the odium behind the Second WW from Germans to Poles, which is falsely claimed to be complicit.
Anyone who is already accustomed to German and already world-wide - rhetoric of whitening Germans and thinking: "Nazis could besides  be Poles" will read Mr Rose's words precisely  like this:
the Holocaust is guilty of:
- German Nazis
- another  Nazis
- any  Polish Nazis
- I'm sorry. Germany Not Nazis
## Polish helpers ## After all, there were camps in Poland?
No 1  is stupid adequate  to truly believe that a broken, sick, cold, starving and coerced man is liable  for mass execution  of Jews during the war.
If, despite this, individual   repeats specified  nonsense, it means that they are trying through repeated lies and false suggestions over many years - these methods we know are described on this blog - to deceive and lead another  people to believe that it would be possible.
In fact, behind specified  action lies a secretly planned task  aimed at tens of years of demanding Poles "reparation" most likely in the form of land.
To this min. comes the false thesis of American Jews demanding 60 billion dollars from Poland for "Jewish estates", which was already in accordance with the rules, according to the law regulated in the 1960s with the US authorities.
An unauthorized request  for money from individual   is an assault and attempted robbery. 
This is simply a pure assault.
Raising these demands to absurd sizes - 60 or even more billion dollars, shows us that money is not the mark  of these bandits, but the land - the land, obtained by the principle: "If you have no money, then return to the ground, here and there, possibly  in the center of Warsaw, where the ghetto was?"
Abstaining from the illegality of specified  demands - the reflection  of these actions leads us to conclusions straight  taken from the post-war years and the uprising of Israel in the Palestinian land.
Because if you can be rudely deceived once, possibly  you can be rudely deceived twice? Well, sure, all the more so, if the lowly "swindled and naive" officials are secret agents on the services of the attacker who only naive pretends to be.
Giving distant  a part  of land in Palestine caused increasing visitor requests, terrorist fight, and an open war against Palestinians. For decades situation In Palestine, she underwent a drastic conversion.
Originally insignificant Israelis dominated Palestinians and began to dictate conditions to them, and the request  for fresh  land never stopped. Palestinians from the dominant position, in their own country went to conspiracy and in time undertook a counter-terrorism conflict  - closely imitating Israeli methods from the beginning of the State of Israel.
Today, Palestinians are widely regarded as terrorists, not insurgents fighting to reclaim their own land.
The planet  opinion changed - she made her head  up about the conflict in Palestine under the influence of media and Western cinema.
In terrorist sucurses, American cinema has come into being, which has gradually changed the way Palestinian or arabian  people have been displayed since the 1960s, increasingly showing them as crazy terrorists.
From the 1980s to today, all  average sensational movie  involving people of origin, let us call it: "Arabic" almost always or always casts these people as terrorists.
I compose  these above from memory, based on a documentary that I saw years ago, most likely on the Planet Channel.
It was already on the blog, in this movie  spoke min. American actor of Lebanese origin - Tony Shalhoub (film detective Monk), who spoke rather  in item  about this problem.
So it is repeated what happened 600 years ago in the Kingdom of Poland - the population came to us from Spain and settled permanently and gradually owned the area, creating ghettos, just as present  visitors from Africa and Asia do in Western countries.
Mr. Rose says:
 "Israelis must realize  this better."
No 1 is stupid, and surely no 1 is stupid, authoritative in crucial state positions in power, and Israelis realize everything perfectly, which leads us to conclude that false blaming Poles for the Holocaust is simply a veiled assault on their part, whose fruit is to be known only to future generations.
This is simply a pure assault.
If individual   planned to attack us, then he defined himself as the enemy of Poles.
What is the point, then, of maintaining a correct or privileged relation  with specified  a country in the mediate  East?
What is the main conclusion of this article basin.pl?
Thomas Rose formulating his ambiguous thesis, he sits as an enemy of Poland and Poles.
Thomas Rose is not a fool who does not know what he is saying, but is an enemy of Poland and Poles who is trying to accomplish  their goals through alleged  soft force - the power of words and frequent repetition of ambiguities too.
Thomas Rose IS an enemy of Poland and Poles.
Every authoritative  who repeats lies about Poles' "partner" or about "Polish camps" - as Barak Obama erstwhile  did - is not a fool or ignorant, but is an enemy of Poland, who occasionally checks whether Poles see it and respond  or not. If they don't respond, it goes on as planned.
The Poles are known in the west for believing the Allies like small  naive children (you get a female  from a tv   – don't believe in these pathetic upheavals, it's a ruthless and hostile person!), but what does that mean?
Because you're not a community, and erstwhile  you're invaded, it's besides   late to build up strength and you gotta always look for strength abroad, alternatively  of first building strength within yourself, building a community that won't let  the state to collapse.
Every Polish man, 30 years old, should have a goal - to make  his own household  and have at least 4  children! If we come back to the border in 50 years, who will? A 70-year-old kid  with fragile bones?
And the Polish state should aid  him, cutting off the power of the banks over the lives of Poles, pulling reparations from Germany, applying simple law and taxes, giving preference for housing and keeping children.
I stress again - I do not know the first  message  of Mr Rose, due to the fact that I think no Polish page has given them directly, and the conclusions written here were written into a text edited by the river basin portal.pl, - which does not mean that the first  message  is not any better.
And now republic.
It's starting nicely, but let's decision  on.
In a speech before the legislature abroad Affairs Committee Tom Rose referred to the complex relations between Poland and Israel, highlighting the historical contexts and the importance of cooperation between both nations:
“Poland and Israel have, to put it mildly, complex relationships, shaped by a shared past of terrible sufferings in fresh times and at the same time for 600 years of effective cooperation,” said Rose.
However, the main part of his statements was the firm rejection of attempts to transfer work for the Holocaust to Poles.
“Poland was not the perpetrator of the Holocaust – Poland was the victim. The Polish nation, the Polish state... the only country that was conquered and never surrendered was Poland,” he stressed.
In his speech Tom Rose besides recalled the heroic actions of Poles during planet War II, including the government in exile in London, participation in fighting in Italy and the invaluable function of Polish pilots in the conflict of England:
— They were Nazis. It was Germany. They were their helpers," he said, clearly identifying those liable for the Holocaust.
Source: Republic, x.com
What's it look like? 
Let me repeat the last 3  sentences here:
- the first 1  looks like an infinite sentence, any  kind of ripped off...
- the another  is detached, completely different, not about
- but the 3rd  conviction  IS JOINED with the second conviction  utilizing a colon at the end of the second sentence!
“Poland was not the perpetrator of the Holocaust – Poland was the victim. The Polish nation, the Polish state... the only country that was conquered and never surrendered was Poland,” he stressed.
In his speech Tom Rose besides recalled the heroic actions of Poles during planet War II, including the government in exile in London, participation in fighting in Italy and the invaluable function of Polish pilots in the conflict of England:
— They were Nazis. It was Germany. They were their helpers," he said, clearly identifying those liable for the Holocaust.
In his speech Tom Rose besides recalled the heroic actions of Poles during planet War II, including the government in exile in London, participation in fighting in Italy and the invaluable function of Polish pilots in the conflict of England:
— They were Nazis. It was Germany. They were their helpers," he said, clearly identifying those liable for the Holocaust.
So it seems that virtually  the Republic repeats the thesis from the article basin.pl, just another way. 
Fragment "...conquered and never gave up" It fits the second conviction  of heroic actions, so I combine them... 
Now these 3  sentences look like this:
“Poland was not the perpetrator of the Holocaust – Poland was the victim. Polish nation, Polish nation...
 The only country that was conquered and never surrendered was Poland,” he stressed.In his speech Tom Rose besides recalled the heroic actions of Poles during planet War II, including the government in exile in London, participation in fighting in Italy and the invaluable function of Polish pilots in the conflict of England:
— They were Nazis. It was Germany. They were their helpers," he said, clearly identifying those liable  for the Holocaust.
I throw out the mediate  text as out of context And I'm going to combine a torn phrase from the first conviction  with the last conviction  that goes into context. matches and They yet   get stuck with each other:
Polish nation, Polish nation...
— They were Nazis. It was Germany. They were their helpers," he said, to clearly identify those liable  for the Holocaust.
Do you understand?
No accidents.
This isn't your TV.
The Germans are burned, the Americans enter their place, and we are back in 1989.

reprint
The river basin.pl
A very crucial voice of the future U.S. Ambassador to Poland was given in Congress
Rose: Poles are incredibly pro-American
Thomas Rose is simply a right-wing publicist known for his pro-Israeli views. He was the advisor to Vice president Mike Pence and editor-in-chief of the "Jerusalem Post".
Rose rated Poland as an exemplary ally of America, as well as a European leader in defence, energy safety and cybersecurity. He said that Poles are an extraordinary nation, proud, sovereign and very pro-American.
– Of course, in Poland there are various interior political disputes, but at the level of 30,000 feet, erstwhile it comes to existential issues, they realize it. They outrun each another to be more American," Rose said.
Rose even announced that Poland "is not just an ally, but a family" and praised Polish governments. At 1 point, he besides suggested that Donald Tusk's squad announced the restoration of the draft. He most likely meant voluntary, universal military training.
Future U.S. Ambassador: These were Nazis, Germans, not Poles
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion, due to the fact that it was in Poland that the Holocaust occurred, this "in any way Poland is responsible".
– They were Nazis, they were Germans, they were their helpers. The Israelis must realize this better. And Poles request to realize Israeli sensitivity better said Rose.
Polish Holocaust Victim
Referring to the question of the alleged restitution of property, he stated that this is an crucial issue, but besides emphasized that "it is very crucial that we all remember who was the victim" – Poland was not the perpetrator of the Holocaust, but its victim.
– Of the 22 countries that Nazi Germany occupied or led through puppet regimes, the only country that was conquered and never surrendered was Poland. The Polish government moved to London, where it served in refugees," he added.
A country in Europe with which America has no problem
In answering questions from 1 of the Democratic Senators, Rose stated that the U.S. had excellent relations with both Donald Tuski and his Civic Coalition as well as with the opposition PiS at the moment. He assured that he would not favour any political organization in Poland at the expense of another.
– If there is 1 country in Europe where America has no problem, it is Poland," he said. erstwhile asked to declare that he would not favour any party, he undertook to do so.
Appointment procedure
Hearing before the legislature committee is simply a key step towards approving presidential denominations for ambassadors, but not the last. In the vast majority of cases, the Senate's approval of the nomination is simply a formality, and no of the senators openly opposed Rose's candidacy. On Wednesday, Rose and her denominations can get the support of the abroad affairs committee. A vote of the full legislature will take place later.
rp.pl/television/art16617861-pull-called-monk
html
basins.pl/world/750564/wspolwina-polakow-za-holocaust-in-home-German-Polish.html
basins.pl/opinie/754116/German-gazeta-polacy-wpolwinni-holokaustu-difficult-theme-for-pis.html
A very crucial voice of the future U.S. Ambassador to Poland was given in Congress
Nominated as the U.S. Ambassador to Warsaw, Thomas Rose recalled in legislature  that Poland was a victim, not a perpetrator of the Holocaust.
Poland's relations with Israel are complicated, but Israelis request to realize that Poland was a victim of the Holocaust," said Thomas Rose, nominee for the U.S. Ambassador position in Warsaw before the legislature abroad Affairs Commission.
Rose assured that, as part of his work, he would search to repair relations between Israel and Poland and promised to keep political neutrality.
Poland's relations with Israel are complicated, but Israelis request to realize that Poland was a victim of the Holocaust," said Thomas Rose, nominee for the U.S. Ambassador position in Warsaw before the legislature abroad Affairs Commission.
Rose assured that, as part of his work, he would search to repair relations between Israel and Poland and promised to keep political neutrality.
Rose: Poles are incredibly pro-American
Thomas Rose is simply a right-wing publicist known for his pro-Israeli views. He was the advisor to Vice president Mike Pence and editor-in-chief of the "Jerusalem Post".
Rose rated Poland as an exemplary ally of America, as well as a European leader in defence, energy safety and cybersecurity. He said that Poles are an extraordinary nation, proud, sovereign and very pro-American.
– Of course, in Poland there are various interior political disputes, but at the level of 30,000 feet, erstwhile it comes to existential issues, they realize it. They outrun each another to be more American," Rose said.
Rose even announced that Poland "is not just an ally, but a family" and praised Polish governments. At 1 point, he besides suggested that Donald Tusk's squad announced the restoration of the draft. He most likely meant voluntary, universal military training.
Future U.S. Ambassador: These were Nazis, Germans, not Poles
Rose stressed that according to the current opinion, due to the fact that it was in Poland that the Holocaust occurred, this "in any way Poland is responsible".
– They were Nazis, they were Germans, they were their helpers. The Israelis must realize this better. And Poles request to realize Israeli sensitivity better said Rose.
As he added, he is very curious  in reconciliation between the 2  countries and believes that he can service  this.
Polish Holocaust Victim
Referring to the question of the alleged restitution of property, he stated that this is an crucial issue, but besides emphasized that "it is very crucial that we all remember who was the victim" – Poland was not the perpetrator of the Holocaust, but its victim.
– Of the 22 countries that Nazi Germany occupied or led through puppet regimes, the only country that was conquered and never surrendered was Poland. The Polish government moved to London, where it served in refugees," he added.
A country in Europe with which America has no problem
In answering questions from 1 of the Democratic Senators, Rose stated that the U.S. had excellent relations with both Donald Tuski and his Civic Coalition as well as with the opposition PiS at the moment. He assured that he would not favour any political organization in Poland at the expense of another.
– If there is 1 country in Europe where America has no problem, it is Poland," he said. erstwhile asked to declare that he would not favour any party, he undertook to do so.
 "If the United States has any interest in any matter, if it has a direct impact on the United States, I will be the President's energetic defender and his program," he added.
Appointment procedure
Hearing before the legislature committee is simply a key step towards approving presidential denominations for ambassadors, but not the last. In the vast majority of cases, the Senate's approval of the nomination is simply a formality, and no of the senators openly opposed Rose's candidacy. On Wednesday, Rose and her denominations can get the support of the abroad affairs committee. A vote of the full legislature will take place later.
rp.pl/television/art16617861-pull-called-monk
html
"co-wine":
basins.pl/world/750564/wspolwina-polakow-za-holocaust-in-home-German-Polish.html
basins.pl/opinie/754116/German-gazeta-polacy-wpolwinni-holokaustu-difficult-theme-for-pis.html
close.pl/synonym/circular opinion
sjp.pwn.pl/slur/opinion.html
Because 2504546.html
== sync, corrected by elderman ==










