Since a fewer weeks old, Salon24, erstwhile known and respected, has turned to dogs present due to the fact that it has been taken over by the erstwhile footballer, they are seeking to reintegrate the fresh AI bot, which has been decomposed by the communists. It is not about vulgar blasphemies, spam or primitive hatred — these have always disappeared and no 1 has done anything about it. They are decomposing of the following ironic, non-compulsory, non-compulsive, frequently mercurial, handheld languages. any pass, others almost identical in content, and vanish without a trace. Without a co-union, without a foundation, without a anticipation of appeal.
People have thus begun to do what they always do in taktutions: observe, compare, test the sounds. There have been theories about the reading between the poems, about the detection of irony, about the punishment of circumstantial themes, about the price of the Narradic. There was besides a humor and a parra, due to the fact that erstwhile reguls are undisclosed, human productions are made faster than algorithms are clustered by concts.
All these observations have a single component in common: they indicate that the strategy does not respond to the content of the plant semantically, but that something more basic and yet more ruthless — to a static risk.
What do users truly see?
With a view to the completion of algorites, it will become chaotic. In practice, 1 is an apparent disorder. They are mostly decomposed of all conflicts, if they are polite. They're decomposing the cogents that come into the dispute, they're contesting, and they're disintegrating, and they're disintegrating. There's quite a few stuff going on, trusms, generals, consents without albo-emotions. There's a sign of smoothness, and there's a sheet.
It's a very distinctive revelation. We do not gotta do with the anticipation of having a parent tongue, but with a felt that has passed the problem. It's ironic. It's a test. Integral conflict is simply a project. The fuck is not a problem.
Technical diagnostics without the explanation of the writing
The simplest explanations are the most sentimental, Ockham's razor is the most useful. All points to the fact that no Autor-based system, no intelligent AI re-issue, no financial price. The content can besides be developed in the form of an external tool for the possible of content, which present is formed by a hurt: a sensitization of the sensitivities, a classification of the volume, a progcation of the risk, established below and the decision-making of the sensitivities, without participation.
This is not an algorithm learning the culture of the Salon24. This algorithm protects the owner before the post-tentional problem. Not before the evil, not before the lie, not before the depth — behind the legal risk.
One owner and 1 contractor
In this area, it is crucial to decision from the signs to the decication. It is the most coherent time, which is inactive crucial for the environment. 1 owner who was active in the average did not agree with the end of the process, which would disagree from any side of the content. And 1 method contractor who has received the following task: to be safe, without affair, without legal problems.
There is no request for sub-television in this system. method completion of non-debt culture projects, behind the safety. Therefore, it is the most primitive, the most asecurative tools available in the market. It sets out the requirements for algorite to remove the 10 dreamy formulas alternatively than let 1 pass away, which could any time be quoted in the context of either the arch-critical.
It's not just a bad crowd. It's an out-sourcinal branch.
In addition, the Commission notes that, in the light of the information provided by the Court of Auditors, the Commission has not taken into account the evidence provided by the Court of Auditors in its assessment.
In effect, the strategy will be established. The General Court of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Court of Justice of the European Union, acting on behalf of the Court of Justice of the European Union, may decide to grant an opinion. Platforma debatats start to pass the debat. It is not due to the fact that individual wants to silence the users, but due to the fact that no 1 took a reprisal for the sense of existence. Algorithm does not dispute what is inactive an intellectual dispute. The owner does not appear to be interested. And the method contractor does not have the mandate to think about the causes of the word.
This is the birthplace of systems that work correctly technically and globally. Algorithms of community media work equally idiotically.
The Salon24 does not have any surplus bota
Today there are ready services on the market, which price the owner of the cheese. This is an example of the Moderation API from OPENAI: we send the text to the end, and then we get a simple informent, whether there is violence, hatred, encouragement to crime, sequestration, etc. The tape serves 1 another for free develling, so it can be utilized for any tiny condition without the geneting of local facilities for each entry. The another companies offer akin APIs with frivolous lymitates, whether or not they are willing to open a soul, which can be utilized on their own cheese without charge for each test.
If the owner of the Salon24 wants to have the option of darmo, the simplest yet to usage the same service: 1 endpoint HTTP, the cost per communicator, and the full intelligence is supplied by an external provider. In applicable terms, the klafiktor has been very simple: if in the context of a combination of words and constructions of conjunctives with power, terrory, it calls for the de-stabilition of the state or the infectives of the weapons, it says: it is not safe and it is simply a condition of the autism that uses the combination of the government or the Gobloku. It is possible to control the following:
- ]]>https://www.nyckel.com/pretrained-classifiers/offensive-language-identifier/]]>
- ]]>https://www.contentmoderationapi.net/_Dashboard/index.php]]>
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/KanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>
]]>https://www.youtube.com/@GPS and Friends]]>
PS. A riddle for attentive readers. I wrote a blog note that the Salon 24 bot removed. However, I applied the trick and added again, so that the man sees precisely the same, and the bot-censor did not announcement it and the note survived. Here she is:
What did the bot fire her for? What's the trick?
