The referendum committee, which initiated the action, accuses Alexander Miszalski primarily of expanding the city's debt and failing to audit the city's finances, deficiency of adequate seriousness in the performance of his function, increases in urban charges hitting residents, increase in authoritative posts, deficiency of fulfilment of key promises or unclear criteria for hiring people without competence in key positions in entities managed by the city. Disturbed residents besides add the Clean Transport region to this long list, which introduces charges for travelling around the city not adequate fresh cars; presently there are excluded residents of the city from these regulations, and visitors are paid.
The run to collect signatures for the referendum is moving fast, signatures are flowing, people are happy to submit them. And what does power do? As they say – drowning razors are caught. The squad of Miszalski's guys (the word is due to the Krowoderska.pl portal, which has been following and scoring for weeks subsequent cases of hiring in intricacies of people with no competence, but with acquaintances, or with one, most crucial acquaintance – with Alexander Miszalski) conducts a media offensive and tries to convince residents that Kraków is "shaping in the right direction". A fresh website has appeared, a peculiar paper is to be placed in the mailboxes of residents, and a million zlotys have been said about planned expenditure for specified purposes. But people don't believe it, and they won't believe it, so let's just leave it at that, and it's more dangerous for the another actions of this unfair crew.
The first charge to be addressed is that it is simply a political action. Yes, that is precisely the charge Miszalski makes to the organizers of the referendum. Political, dirty, evil, and terrible action opposed to the pure as a teardrop of civic action, which supposedly was "a referendum of hatred" (because that is the name the poor, frightened Alexander of the 8 Star Miszalski) was not and is not. It'd be comic if it wasn't dangerous. It is dangerous for people, after years of training, to respond to the word "political" in an appropriate way, most frequently with resentment and distance, due to the fact that if something is "political", it is better not to have anything to do with it.
In the meantime, politics is simply a substance of government, so yes, things like elections, election campaigns or referendums were, are and will be a political substance due to the fact that they concern state governance. That's it. And there's nothing incorrect with it, there's just the normality and work of the residents for their city. In a word, we are taking part in a political referendum and we are arrogant of it.
Secondly, the immortal issue “and who is behind it and whose money?” Honestly, I don't know. I didn't analyse this matter, and I'm not going to. Of course, I know who's on the referendum committee, due to the fact that this committee presents itself on its website. It besides stresses that its members are not representatives of 1 party, and that among the full group are people with different views, including PO/KO voters. Well, that's all it takes to convince me no more that Alexander MiszaIski needs to be cancelled. I've been waiting for this for a long time, and there have been a lot more voices like mine in public space. The question was only who and whenFor the question is We've already answered. And whether Luke Gibala is behind it or the Confederate, the Crown or the PSL or the Law and Justice – they are right about this 1 thing, which is why I support this initiative. And I'm grateful to the organizers for taking care of it, no substance who convinced them.
Thirdly, "How not Miszalski is who? There is no 1 else here.” Whoever takes the place of Alexander Miszalski will prove it, but I know 1 thing – whoever it is must be on guard. If we cancel Miszalski, we'll cancel the next one, too, if it doesn't work. And this chosen person, whoever she is, will gotta remember that. So yes, it is worth canceling Alexander MiszaIski, even if – God forbid – his successor would be a typical of the same party. The basis for effective action is simply a sense of self-depreciation and the inhabitants of Krakow are fighting for them. If we win, politicians will think twice before they underestimate us.
Fourthly, Luke Gibala. This name appears most frequently in the context of a referendum, just after Alexander Miszalski. I will not explain briefly to readers of Krakow – local activist, city council, respective presidential candidates, minimally lost to Miszalski in 2023 in the second round; even a book was created on how unclean this run was and what plays were utilized against him. erstwhile associated with the PO and the Palikot Movement, it presently operates within its Kraków Association for Residents. In a word, not my fairy tale. However, it is hard to be curious in Krakow and Łukasz Gibala did not know, not to see its activities in the tiny everyday matters of the city. Kraków for Residents, as well as another organizations, including the Confederacy, the Law and the Polish Defence Movement, joined the collection of signatures for the referendum, and that was adequate for the device to decision – quite a few allegations that Gibale dreamed of power, that he could not forgive his defeat, that his presidency would be bad or even worse than that of Miszalski. Although he was not the 1 who started the referendum with the action, and I wondered for any time why he inactive does not – now I know, seemingly he wanted to avoid all this. However, I find these allegations absurd: if individual knows what is incorrect in Krakow, and knows how to change it, then yes, let him dream of power and let him effort to realize this dream! Only people with imagination and conviction can change something for the better. The referendum is simply a tool that gives citizens the right that democracy gives us, so fiercely defended erstwhile it is simply a power camp. So even if the biggest political opponent of Miszalski degasses them, that doesn't change anything, due to the fact that he wouldn't find the susceptible land of Łukasz Gibala if Alexander Miszalski ruled well.
Fifth, unfair play. 1 can only inform against this by relying on the prudence of the Krakus, for it will be hard to stop. Thus, there is information on the web that the Kraków councilmen are submitting respective signatures under the referendum list, including, of course, several—or all—false, which gives a deceptive impression that the signatures are already more than in reality. any people run information that signatures can be submitted via the net (it is not possible, this is national law and it does not depend on people collecting signatures under the Kraków referendum), others not to enter their data and enter false ones on the list. It's all lies to sow chaos and torpedo the legal, democratic initiative of the local referendum.
So, Krakusi, let's not give up! This is to be done, we can defend our city. And readers from another localities are asking for support – especially prayerful, but it can besides be mental, present on the net anyone can speak.
