Publicity

This text was almost ready earlier, and the delayed publication stems from the desire to distance ourselves from fresh events, including by readers. It may be hard to convince supporters of various political options in Poland that their grouping is not so much different from the others as they would like. For example, that the "democratic opposition" is not as democratic as it is, and it does precisely what its opponents do erstwhile it suits it. She is only much more inclined to keep appearances and more submissive to EU and US rulers, thus avoiding their shoals, which so badly harm the image of the another party. It is worth remembering that European or American praise does not mean that their addressee is working for the good of his country and its citizens.

The parties of the "democratic opposition" are equal to the PiS as undemocratic parties of the chief type. This is the main reason for their difficulty in taking a common position or taking joint elections. There is simply a constant problem that the chief would then be more crucial and that would gotta go into the shadows. Have you heard of any intraparty democratic procedures, specified as organization referendums on these or any another subjects?

An excellent example of how decisions are made in a highly democratic PO organization is the fresh thought of putting the candidacy of Roman Giertych to the legislature from the Poznań district, carried out by a organization drill with the complete omission of local activists, who in this case no 1 asks for their opinion. As far as I can tell, Gierty is not even a associate of the party. In addition, how is the thought of introducing Gierty, whose views are well known, to promises to soften the anti-abortion bill? The PO will most likely do nothing about it, just as it did nothing during its erstwhile governments. Politically, it is much more convenient for them to keep promising than to act. And it doesn't substance whether or not the Games are yet set up. As an indicator of intraparty democracy, the very fact that specified an thought is being pushed forward is important.

Yeah, well, it's not necessarily the latest invention. It is easy to forget this by listening to the media of the instigators. In the meantime, it is worth remembering, you can mention the full gallery of portraits of professionals from predecessors. We must bear in head that our favourite political parties are besides not blameless and that they are not truly very different from others. In fact, differences between parties and politicians of different options are only cosmetic, and in elections we can only choose the lesser evil. So it would be good for us to be able to see them on both sides, not succumbing to the sound and force of the media and not being deceived by the false brightness of expected values. Just due to the fact that individual considers themselves the sole holder of the definition of good doesn't mean he's good. It reminds everyone of the European Union of Freedom, an advanced predecessor of PO, fat cats challenging all workers' and economical rights defenders from homo sovieticus.

However, I wanted to rise a somewhat different topic, namely the alleged Russian Commission and problem with the presence of abroad influence agents in public life. Here too, in order to give the case a appropriate perspective, it should be recalled that in the polls before the first circular of the 2005 presidential election led Cimoszewicz before Tusk and Kaczyński. And then Tusk and his electoral staff utilizing peculiar services, in those days favorable to them, played a Russian card, brutally attacking Vladimir Cimoszewicz as a Russian agent. He was falsely accused, not in court or in front of the committee, but in the media showing a multitude of papers that later, after the election, all proved false and the charges completely unfounded. Of course, no 1 was held liable for the full affair of responsibility, neither the service contractors nor the PO payer. Serviceable journalists from all media outlets had nothing to accuse themselves of. Tusk himself then pretended that he knew nothing and is like an Orlean Virgin. This did not change the fact that just before the elections the support for Cimoszewicz fell very strongly, and he himself, as a consequence of Tusk and PO's hatred and slander campaign, withdrew his candidacy. Different people later told Cimoszewicz that you were weak due to the fact that he couldn't stand it. Well, not everyone is as armory as Marian the current CEO of NIK. mediocre Scrupulants were effectively exhausted and in opposition to the PO they remained strong and unscrupulous, so now 1 can complain about the morals in politics and the corrupting of democracy by others. That's what you wanted, Grzegorz Dyndala. As a consequence of the full action, support for Tusk did not grow and Kaczyński won, as people feared the neoliberal spokesperson for the large capital which Tusk has always been and which has now been carefully forgotten, making him a friend of the people and defender of democracy. So it was thanks to Tusk that we had president Lech Kaczyński. Now bad karma returns to Tusk and he himself became a Russian agent, and since a akin media action might not win this time, a commission was invented for him.

Advised PO journalists are outraged that the Russian commission and the effort to take back Tusk's passive electoral law for being an agent of abroad forces, that is, precisely what he himself did in 2005 in a somewhat different way, is lawlessness and an unheard thing in a free and democratic country. However, you do not request to look far to find a counterexample. Just beyond our borders, their idol, the president of Ukraine, has eliminated practically all opposition. Her representatives were killed or imprisoned, any fled abroad. In this case, the allegations of pro-Russianism were undoubtedly true, due to the fact that since always the full east of Ukraine is such, and Zelenski was elected due to the fact that he promised these people equal rights and protection against the purges led by nationalists from western Ukraine and attacks of the neo-Nazi Azov regiment, besides artillery. Then, partially through the influence of the US, he changed the front and forgot his promises. What appeal procedure is provided for members of the opposition there? Ukrainian spiritual leaders and independent journalists have besides been imprisoned by this defender of democracy on the charge of pro-Russianism and someway no 1 here is bothered.

Someone may reject this example, arguing that Ukraine is simply a country at war, so supposedly power can more there, besides violate citizens' rights. So let us look at the largest defender of democracy, freedom and the regulation of law in the world, that is, the USA, whose representatives have late spoken frequently and sharply about the Polish emergency committee. The Polish media present this scantly and unilaterally, but there are a number of proceedings going on to prevent Donald Trump from starting in the presidential election. Most of these proceedings do not meet the requirements of the regulation of law, and are based on suspected Russian influence on the erstwhile choice. fresh allegations are being made, which are being refuted as unfounded 1 by one, but we will not learn this from TVN or TOK FM. Just as we will not learn about the serious criminal charges against the full Biden family, due to the fact that the US and Polish media favouring the Democrats completely ignore this subject, focusing on Trump. Meanwhile:

November 18, 2022

https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/what-do-hunter-biden-ghislaine-maxwell

Republicans in the home of Representatives announced an investigation into president Joe Biden's family, including his boy huntsman Biden, on Thursday, just a day after gaining control of the home of Lower Congress.

"I want to be clear, this is an investigation into Joe Biden and this committee will focus on the next congress," said Republican organization typical James Comer.

"These include conspiracy or fraud of the United States, electronic fraud, conspiracy to commit electronic fraud, violation of the abroad Agents Registration Act (FARA), violation of the abroad Corruption Practices Act, violation of the Act on the Protection of Victims of Trafficking in Human Beings, taxation evasion, money laundering and conspiracy to launder money".

A detailed study sent to territory attorneys, U.S. prosecutors and all 535 members of the home and the legislature includes 140 alleged business-related crimes, 191 sex-related crimes, and 128 drug-related crimes.

Much of the evidence in this case was obtained as a consequence of the disclosure of the contents of huntsman Biden's laptop (Joe's son). The subject is besides completely unknown.

https://bidenlaptopreport.marcopolousa.org/

Thus, it can be surmised that the loud confusion around Trump is not only an effort to deprive him of his passive electoral right. It besides serves to media “cover” and divert attention from Joe Biden's criminal activities and his family.

However, I wanted to address a somewhat different, more general and fundamental subject, namely, Should people working for abroad countries or organisations be able to hold public positions in Poland? This issue has long been the subject of debate and controversy in many countries, which has led to the emergence of phenomena and even lobbying institutions. It was recognised that the ombudsmen of various groups, industries, etc. should not be able to sit in typical bodies, but they can present their demands and arguments to those elected to those bodies. Lobbyists are registered, and everything should be openly and openly. At least on the assumption.

Similarly, in post-war Poland, representatives of the episcopate, priests and nuns were not considered to be elected for parliament and senate. Today, they are reportedly prohibited by church law. Regardless of legal changes, different circumstances and opinions on the subject, this decision is right. Their power and the country they loyally service is not Poland, but the Pope and Vatican. Many times the conduct of the members of the Episcopate proved that for them the Vatican's instructions were higher than the applicable law of the Polish state. The interests of spiritual groups may be represented by Members and Senators from various parties.

For persons who are ombudsmen of abroad states or abroad organisations of conduct in different countries, they are different. In many countries, too, this is an unregulated substance in Poland, so it is worth looking at what it looks like in the US, where there is regulation of this matter. According to Wikipedia (quoting passage):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Agents_Registration_Act

The abroad Agents Registration Act (FARA) (22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq.) is simply a United States law which imposes a public disclosure work on persons representing abroad interests. It requires that ‘foreign agents’ — defined as persons or entities active in home lobbying or advocacy for abroad governments, organisations or individuals (‘foreign payers’) — registry with the Justice Department (DOJ) and disclose their relations, actions and related financial compensation.

FARA shall not prohibit or restrict any circumstantial activities from lobbying for abroad interests. Its clear the nonsubjective is to advance transparency with respect to abroad influence on American public opinion, policy and lawFor this intent The Department of Justice is obliged to make specified information public.

[...]

FARA is administered and enforced by the FARA Unit of the Counterintelligence and Export Control Section (CES) within the Department of National safety of the Department of Justice (NSD). Since 2016, there has been a 30% increase in registration; as of November 2022 more than 500 active abroad agents were registered in the FARA Unit.

As you can see, the problem has been taken rather seriously and pragmatically. You can lobby and even take money for it, but you should do it openly. It is interesting to see how, in the light of specified a law, a poem of Solidarity would have looked at that time regularly going to the U.S. embassy after paying wages (That's what happened. I know it from them. Sometimes I buy those dollars.), allegedly from the AFL-CIO union headquarters, de facto From the CIA? At the same time, the local Solidarity activists suffered all the consequences of union activities without any aid. What is the founding of the Electoral paper for American money? I remember violent denials, pretending to be Greek and mocking erstwhile the then authority dared to mention American influences on Solidarity.

While everyone is willing to agree that lobbying for external entities should in any way be disclosed and controlled, controversy may arise with a list of those entities and circumstantial solutions. By the slogan of Russia, everyone will cry out according to the fact that control should be strict, and it would be best for Russian agents to be imprisoned and even better shot. So is China, but what about others? If we want to add the U.S. to the list, there will be those who will protest violently. He's our ally, our good uncle, our savior. fewer people will think that the interests of the empire are completely different from ours, and Poland is just a tiny toy and a means to an end. Without blinking an eye He will sacrifice us as he sacrificed Ukraine. Other countries care about their interests, not ours. What about various global organisations, NATO, WHO, EU, WEF? Or global corporations like Pfizer or global banks? My position on this is simple. All countries and all these organizations have their goals and interests, which disagree in many ways from our Polish ones. Yes, yes, the European Union, and in peculiar its bureaucracy has interests rather different from ours, as does NATO. Therefore, all representatives of external interests should registry as abroad agents.

It is worth noting that there is no appeal procedure in the US FARA regulations. The agent has an absolute work to register, and if he doesn't complete it, he commits a crime. Poland should have a akin legal act. The U.S. Department of Justice is obliged to make public information about registered agents. It should be akin with us. This would be important, especially before the elections.

As we know, the mention of Russian influences in Poland raises widespread hysteria, which is why specified allegations have been made against Tusk. The kind he utilized against Cimoshevich. I think they are absurd, and in Polish public life Russian agents outside Macerewicz will not be found. Similarly, the Russian bill late signed by the president can be identified with a number of legal errors. Furthermore, the president himself announced that he would send her to the Court as shortly as the law was signed and that he would amend it. This ridicules the bill and puts its legal basis in question. The PiS acts as usual arrogantly and incompetently. possibly individual else, specified as the PO, would do it more elegantly with better appearances of the regulation of law. I disagree with the form and content of the present procedurebut it remains a meritum, The fundamental question is: how should the fact of being a abroad influence agent be treated by a individual in public life, and what should the consequences be?

I say that Tusk and respective another people, especially the PO, should openly admit to representing abroad interests. Tusk and Trzaskowski did brainwashing at the WEF’s school of global youth leaders And they are janchars of this organization whose goals have nothing to do with our interests and our country. They don't peculiarly brag about it on their résumé, as if it's not crucial or embarrassing. Unfortunately, no 1 will charge them with specified a charge, due to the fact that for the people in Poland, the WEF is only a gathering of rich people in Davos at an elaborate meal. fewer people are aware of the objectives of the WEF and how powerful its influences are. And you request to know what this organization is and what it is, due to the fact that it is she and her people who form our future. A short introduction can be read here:

https://jacekkh.substack.com/p/wef-world-forum-economic

Young WEF leaders were trained to support the interests of a global supranational government representing a public-private partnership in which Business interests of global corporations that are members of the WEF take precedence over the Constitution of Poland and another countries. The WEF believes that the concept of independent national states is obsolete and must be replaced by a global government that controls everything. Individual rights of individuals are besides out of the question and should step down against global challenges, defined by global capital and subordinate transnational organisations specified as the UN, WHO, IPCC.

Beautiful slogans and all the talk about democracy and civilian liberties cultivated by Tusk and his like are just the mammoth of the audience and the cover on the way to gain power. The intent of these people is not a good life and freedom of Poles, but the interests of global corporations. Their task is to deprive us of our basic rights, form us into obedient slaves of large capital marked with digital-biometric identifiers and enclosed in 15-minute cities without the anticipation of leaving them. They will usage the imaginary state of higher climate necessity, pandemic necessity, war on terrorism, or 1 more step at a time and 1 more step at a time. Do we truly want them to regulation Poland?