Assigned to Saint Augustine, the rule says that where God is in the first place, everything else is in the right place. What happens to institutions, communities, countries that completely destruct the individual of God? A description of the effects of specified “building” in your book “Golden Flesh and False Prophets. You as a tool for fighting God” was presented by prof. Piotr Mazurkiewicz.
The author, an outstanding expert in social sciences, leads us in a very interesting way through the past of civilization, focusing our attention on their crisis phases. It turns out that in all case the origin of the change in the eternal order, which has always meant the misfortune of the large crowds of people, was an effort to destruct the origin for all collective which constitutes the foundation of the inalienable—the divine factor.
The cover of the book “Golden Flesh and False Prophets. You as a tool for fighting God” by Fr Piotr Mazurkiewicz, Wyd. Biały Kruk.People's wisdom, jokingly reproving the erring words “Hulai the soul, hell there is,” is undoubtedly the fruit of centuries-old experiences utilized by simple but thought-provoking people with common sense and logic. For any reason, however, the elites of states and societies and, above all, the possessions able to enter into the function of leaders and to put into practice the ideas of madness, highly illogical, leading towards further major disasters. Yet even the figures who considered revolutionary, specified as Napoleon I Bonaparte, were able to state that "the imagination of the top even genius is nothing compared to the treasury of the experiences of humanity." And Wiktor Suvorov, describing the events of russian intervention in Czechoslovakia in the memorable year 1968, noted, among others, specified advice from a Czech Prague citizen, directed at russian officers: “It was essential to test your communism on rats first before you started taking it among people!”
Leading his readers through successive so painful and costly (especially the death and suffering of large masses of people) human experience resembles the bitter fact about the scale of support that many highly toxic leaders managed to obtain. And besides quite a few ideologies that, of the very essence of things, meant the digging of graves by those who followed it. There is no request even to scope out to this knowledge, which should most likely be universal. That is, for example, to the past or large literature contained in the testimonies. After all, anyone who knows even the basic set of school readings had to meet a view specified as providentialism. In the native literature of Poles, this apparent inability to build anything affirmative and at the same time reversed from God's law is clearly expressed, among others, on the pages of "No – Divine Comedy" by Zygmunt Krasiński. In order to avoid roads towards the most destructive manovists, however, it is adequate not even to know basic reading, but – the most simple concepts. After all, absolutely no 1 on the simple level who knows the concept of “state” will always usage the concept of “world-neutral state”. knowing that 1 of the most fundamental functions of the state (functions so fundamental, that to a fundamental degree for that is why they were and are called up states) is the law. And absolutely all law – grows on the ground of specified a alternatively than another ethics. So it comes from just 1 – the worldview. So the separation of the state from the worldview is equivalent to the annihilation of an entity called a state. So there never was, there is, and there will be nothing like any "world-neutral state." So anyone who uses specified a concept must be a slanderer, a villain and at best a marginal ignorant. And anyone who put his hand in making a legal norm out of the intrinsically contradictory notion of the alleged “world-neutral state” has done evil with incalculable consequences. He has thus made the basis of the social structure on a foundation composed of dynamite, TNT, if not more destructive material. specified a construction either explodes or makes lies an simple norm – it will transform earthly realities into realities of hell on earth.
The utmost absurdity of the “state of world-neutral” most frequently serves to cynically mask hostility towards God and religion. Under the motto of this “neutrality” in revolutionary France, all the properties of the Church were plundered and nationalized simultaneously exterminating a large part of the people of the spiritual state, delegating spiritual assemblies, prohibiting believers of their eternal spiritual practices. 7 100 churches were blown up in Moscow within 1 month. The Kuriosian standard of many states boasting of their “worldview neutrality” is the ban on the existence in the public space of signs of Christian religion as well as conventional costumes of priests or spiritual sisters. In the same countries, however, no 1 opposes the ritualist clothing of Islam or the collective prayers of Muslims 5 times a day blocking traffic. This shows nothing but a state hostility to Christians and a paralyzing cowardice toward those coming with this religion, whose followers do not hesitate to cut the throats of everyone in any way in their way. Nothing more – we have adequate evidence present of how “the world-neutral states” can be ruthless in relation to the religion of the ombudsmen of peace and agree to anything erstwhile they are dealing with aggressive and not intrusive.
It is not a work of chance, but an eternal anthropological norm, the existence in all civilizations and cultures of a sphere usually referred to as a “tab”. This sphere always contained what everyone thought to be unquestionably obvious, as holiness. And it's 1 that was an imponderabilum that guaranteed order in the most crucial matters. specified non-negotiable fundamental governance issues include values specified as human life. This essential substance was left in the hands of God. And they wouldn't let themselves to interfere with who had the right to live and who didn't. The only exception could have been to punish you for taking your life for the heaviest crime. Just as criminally unjustified – taking someone's life. However, deciding who has the right to be born and who does not – always remained outside the sphere belonging to any of the people. Like assessing whether a life is worth surviving or not. Human life, as holiness in all form, was not subject to earthly jurisdiction. Hence, the Bible’s command and even the command: “Honor your father, even though he loses his mind.” due to the fact that having no sense is about humanity. This fundamental rule dared to break only Descartes with his “I think I am.” What should be asked, “And if I have lost my ability to think, then I am gone?” It is no coincidence that the precursor of the Enlightenment era was besides a precursor of times of contempt for life, times of genocide carried out in Wandea and not only. And the alleged “right” to crimes specified as abortion or euthanasia followed them. "Rights" in today's degenerate planet included even in "human rights".
Even in the 1980s, Poland was the first corapheus to fight totalitarianism, the first rejecting so vile ideology of Marxism. However, the end of this disgusting doctrine was not to reject it as unequivocal—evil. This expected end was a far-reaching compromise with this very – evil. A systemic transformation launched in the late 1980s, in which the heroes of the conflict for freedom were thrown into a social margin, ridiculed and condemned to poorness and the beneficiaries became yesterday's tyrants and criminals privileged with impunity and the right to unlimited robbery – she had to bring the current degrengolada. And along with it on a massive scale – the crossing of moral spines. Could it have been otherwise if the "historic compromise" had brought punishment for nobility and reward for wickedness?
Rejecting everything that in the full tradition of our civilization the most sacred, noblest, creative and most affirmative fertilizing – had to lead and lead present to the expanding enslavement of man. A planet in which, alternatively of those respected by all holiness, procedures are introduced primarily in the interests of a narrow, selfish and completely heartless clique – is building a reality placed on its head. And in specified a reality there is no place for the dignity of a human individual and for simple normality. That is why present all kinds of perversions are promoted, having present not only the legal position of the norm, but the value of the nobilized, exalted, privileged.
A wonderfully published, beautifully illustrated and aptly illustrated by works of large European art, the book by the priest Piotr Mazurkiewicz is simply a fascinating lecture, which almost all verse stimulates reflection. Not usually happy, but we always request it. This book organizes the thoughts of all afraid by the ever-increasing drift of the modern world. It facilitates knowing of the causes, equips with intellectual and spiritual defence weapons. So it is simply a book of all measurement worthy of having, reading, considering, studying.
Artur Adamski
