Deputy Minister of Funds and Regional Policy Jacek Karnowski and PiS MP Karol Karski discussed on Polsat News about government ideas for the cryptocurrency bill. erstwhile asked how they felt the issue should be solved, they came to an agreement and gave their hands as a sign of agreement.
In Wednesday's "Shubartovich's imagination Point", politicians discussed the President's decision on the crypto-activism bill. According to president Zbigniew Bogucki, on Wednesday the head of the Chancellery of president Zbigniew Bogucki, the task proposed by Karol Nawrocki was sent to the talker of the Sejm of Włodzimierz Czarzasty.
Two earlier government projects met with the presidential veto. For the 3rd time, Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced the proposal for the cryptoactivism marketplace bill to the Sejm on Tuesday, but part of the coalition disagrees with the proposals of the head of government. Poland 2050 submitted a separate bill to the Sejm. According to the head of the group Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the task has a better chance of signing the president.
The president has filed a bill on cryptocurrency. Politicians Comment
- I'm sorry. The government task is simply a government project, not a government part task - said Minister of State at the Ministry of Funds and Regional Policy Jacek Karnowski on Polsat News. - It's the same on both sides. It is not that Solidarna Poland was making its own project, and now Poland 2050 - continued the KO politician.
As Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced before the announcement of the presidential bill, the 3rd version of the government paper assumes "a clearer tightening of penalties for those who usage people's dreams, sometimes naivety of people, sometimes deficiency of knowledge, deceive them and exposure the Polish state, our safety is compromised."
SEE: Poles assessed Nawrocki. There have been no specified results for a long time
The head of the President's Chancellery assessed that the presidential draft bill was mostly based on government ideas. He stressed that it was meant to defend consumers and investors and to supply "real, effective, liable state protection, that is, the supervision of state institutions over the crypto-active market".
- I'm sorry. If a government organization and a government coalition wanted to cooperate in this area, it would have been long gone. Unfortunately, there is no goodwill on the part of the government, possibly now the government will wake up," said Bogacki.
During the April vote in the Sejm on the rejection of the presidential veto to the cryptocurrency Act, PiS president Jarosław Kaczyński stated that he is simply a supporter of only 1 solution, which is the full ban on cryptocurrency in Poland.
- I'm sorry. I don't have cryptocurrency either, mostly I don't have any assurance in it," said Karol Karski in the Polsat News politician PiS. Unexpectedly, Karnowski besides agreed with the thought of the president of PiS. - I don't have a cryptocurrency either. Here we agree with the president - he said, after which Karski and I shook hands together.
WIDEO: An exceptional motion on Polsat News. KO and PiS politicians agree as never
The cryptocurrency Act. What about consumer protection?
The Sejm first passed a code-acts marketplace bill in late September 2025. It assumes that the Financial Supervision Commission will be in charge of this market. The law was besides intended to implement the EU MiCA Regulation.
The president vetoed it on 1 December 2025, in an excuse pointing to "overregulation" and the hazard to civilian liberties, peculiarly in the context of provisions allowing fast blocking of crypto entities' websites.
SEE: Nawrocks is putting together a crypto-acts task for the Sejm. "To a large degree based on government"
The Sejm re-adopted the Act on crypto-acts, almost unchanged, at the end of December last year the Act was besides vetoed by president Karol Nawrocki on 12 February 2026. In the parliamentary vote held on 17 April, the veto was not rejected.
The presidential side argued, inter alia, that the proposed solutions were excessive and did not take into account the essential amendments proposed during the legislative work.
Did you see anything important? Send a picture, a movie, or compose what happened. usage our Inductors
