The main argument in favour of changing the rules is to rise citizens' safety levels due to the war in Ukraine. What is allowed by a soldier is not a civilian Now access to specified protective equipment is limited – it can be legally acquired by entrepreneurs, for example, who have appropriate concessions, schools providing courses for bodyguards or training companies preparing candidates for safety work. The authors of the bill argue that only passive equipment – that is, 1 that cannot be utilized offensively – should not be subject to the same rigors as weapons or ammunition. Although the marketplace offers "civil" vests or helmets, real access to them is illusory, as the applicants emphasize. Entrepreneurs with a licence are reluctant to sale specified equipment to private persons, fearing the legal implications or ambiguities of interpretation. On the another hand, people who effort to get available helmets legally – for example older military models – frequently scope for collectible items that do not offer a adequate level of protection. specified a situation leads to a dangerous paradox – citizens are faced with a dilemma in order to guarantee their own safety: either they hazard breaking regulations or they are victimized by fraudsters offering attaps or untested equipment. This problem besides concerns people who travel to Ukraine with humanitarian or journalistic missions, where real life threats are everyday. It is worth to have an escape backpackIn the context of threats arising from armed conflicts The Government safety Centre regularly urges citizens to prepare evacuation backpacks. specified a set should contain the most crucial things essential to last a fewer days away, i.e. documents, water, food, flashlight, hygiene, powerbank, basic medicines. If the proposed changes enter into force, the backpack can besides be legally fitted with a bulletproof vest and helmet. erstwhile can change take effect? The task is now in the process of analysis and consultation, including public consultation. erstwhile they have been completed, if it has a affirmative opinion, it may be directed to first reading in the Sejm. Then, if it is accepted by Members, it will go to the legislature and yet to the President's signature. Read also:
