As we have reported, a petition has late been sent to the president to rise the retirement age for women who have no children. Childrenless ladies, according to this idea, would work until they were 65. The main nonsubjective of the task is to solve demographic problems in our country.
RECLAMA
See Pavlović video about your retirement:
A politician showed how old women should retire
Petition sparked a discussion on the retirement age of women. The vote was taken by Confederate politician Rafal Mekler. On his social media profiles, he made available a graphics that, in his opinion, presents the best solution.
The thought of reducing retirement age in proportion to the contribution to the common good of the nation, I consider very good
- the politician wrote.
We see on the graphic that childless women, as in a task that late went to the President, would work until they were 65. In contrast, in the case of women who had 1 child, the retirement age would be 63 years. It was only with 2 children that women could quit as they are now, after their 60th birthday. On the another hand, mothers of at least 3 children could finish their employment at 55.
"Sharing on better and worse"
The policy proposal has aroused large emotions, as evidenced by comments under the Facebook post.
Very good idea. Brilliant. [...] This is expected to be a form of thanks to the state for women who have dedicated their body, wellness and life to give birth to the next generation of young citizens
- 1 of the men wrote. However, the vast majority of commentators did not like the idea. Among another things, there were voices in the discussion that specified solutions make further unnecessary social divisions. Besides, as the commentators note, the fact that individual has not become a parent or has only 1 kid is not always a substance of his decision.
There's another divided between better and worse. individual who chooses motherhood or so his life worked out is better than the 1 who paid taxes all the time while the first 1 was on maternity and parenting.
It's not always a woman's choice. This frequently involves surviving conditions and economics.
There are women who have been pregnant respective times in their lives and were not allowed to become a mother.
- we read politics under the post. The discussion besides raised crucial questions.
Isn't work a contribution to society?
I'm the 1 who's asking out of curiosity, what about women who, for wellness reasons, like infertility, can't have children?
- we can read in the comments section. How do you feel about the thought of making women's retirement age dependent on the number of children? We encourage you to participate in the probe and comment on the article.
