Colours (Nai) of the fight
The 10th anniversary of the winning confrontation with the IPN in defence of Docent Kossecki.
It's 1989. Western news services have been starting the largest operation since the martial law in Poland. 1 of its elements is the diversion in the economical area of the recently created III Republic. The performers of this “reform” gained their experience at abroad scholarships for many years. In 1989, they could with all the programmed precision complete the assumptions of the plans developed in the West (Plan Soros). As a result, in the next 10 years, most national assets are to be sold out, unemployment will be drastically increased and social change will lead to demographic collapse. A wave of euphoria after a transformative nation is unaware of this. Under these conditions, only a fewer national activists are aware of what “a good uncle from the West” is preparing for Poles, and among them is docent Józef Kossecki. These changes with their results exceeded the achievements of the Nazi occupation, which was very aptly exposed by prof. Stefan Kurowski, who stigmatized the actions of the protege Waldemar Kuczyński – prof. Leszek Balcerowicz. The only real force in this period opposed to the looting transformation of Poland was organization X, led by Stanisław Tymiński and then by Józef Kossecki. This political formation by decision of the ultimate Court was unlawful in the late 1990s, but its leaders were further condemned, especially since the Kossecki docent was socially training staff in a nationalist spirit.
The government couldn't look at it peacefully and decided to act. Under the pretext of the historical-scientific session, the Institute of National Memory organised a conference entitled "National Numbers of Democratic Opposition in PRL 1955-1990". It was preceded by many information clashes both in conventional media and in increasingly widely utilized websites. The aim of these actions was to attack ad personam on the Docent of Józef Kossecki, while organizationally – the secret national structure – the National-Democratic League.
Why was the individual of the Kossecki Docent and the organization of the LND with which he was associated taken for the intent of the propaganda apparatus – the organization round-table government of the 3rd Republic of Poland? I will present the answers to these questions in 3 points, following the classical convention in the analysis of events, reporting the causes, course and effects of the information clash 10 years ago.
1. REASONS
The reasons for the attack on LND and Kossecki should be looked for in the deep beginnings of the People's Poland and in the fight for influence and form on it between the Polish and anti-Polish factions in the organization and state PRL apparatus. After 1956, the Polish faction gained an expanding influence on these structures, and the reason for this was the organizer of its system. This was the secret structure, derived partially from the National Order ONR, the anti-Masonian cell of the Camp of large Poland and the 2nd Branch of the Main Staff of the Polish Army, or alleged Two. The head of this structure, whose docent Józef Kossecki never mentioned the name, utilizing the phrase "higher level of the League" – was Valenty Majdanski, an outstanding demographer.
The anti-Polish wing in the organization that lost the fight for influence was supported by Western information centres. The breakthrough of the 1950s and 1960s was a period of intensifying the conflict between the West and the East, whose field was demography. Western powers with the United States at the head were ideologically programmed by liberal-free-mural centres. Thus, as part of the intellectual war against the East Block, they utilized neomaltusianism as a weapon. This was to infect the opponent with the incorrect algorithms, which were to lead to the depopulation of the population in these countries, and thus besides in Poland. erstwhile in 1959 the authorities of the People's Poland under the influence of the anti-Polish Zionist wing in PZPR introduced the statutory anticipation of killing unborn children, the nationalists decided to counter this. A higher level launched an organization whose aim was to rise awareness of young Poles about the deadly threat to the nation in connection with this bill. This organization was established as early as 1958 National-Democratic League. Her main activist was a young, highly talented postgraduate of Gliwice University of Technology – Józef Kossecki. Working in PAX (although he did not have time to become a member) Kossecki was very energetic about the structure of this organization throughout the country. The results were very promising. The anti-Polish faction, Zionist (i.e. the alleged Puławans) felt threatened. As early as 1959, Kosselsky was removed from the Scouting for a “cleric-nationalistic deviation” with the aid of his fellow Puławian friend Jack Kuronia. On May 7, 1960, officers of the Ministry of the Interior, subordinate to the Puławy faction Antoni Alster, arrested Kossecki and respective another mainly sympathizers of the Warsaw LND structure. Kossecki was the only 1 of respective defendants sentenced to 2 years in prison and served time, but not entirely. During this time, thanks to the high-level infiltration work of the LND, the Polish wing in the party-state apparatus of the PRL had more and more to say. The Puławians did not like it, which is why through their Alster agents in the MMA they were spreading rumors about Kossecki's agential activity. After years, in III Poland, which is the work of Puławian pupils, the same method will be utilized by the government IPN. But I'll get back to that. After his release from prison, Józef Kossecki settled permanently in Warsaw and continuing his career as a scientist continued his political activity from a higher level through the untraceable alsters from the MMA of the LND structure. The advanced tier of the League after the 1960 collapse banned him from authoritative political activity for 5 years. On the another hand, he was tasked with observing the increasing influences of the alleged Commandos, or informal youth village of Puławy. To this end Kossecki gained the cooperation of Louis Hass, a Trotskyist with a Polish heart. utilizing methods of pre-war 2 and modern, developed by themselves elements of sociotechnology, Kossecki had excellent insight into the Commandos' environment and knew about their plans. His invaluable observational cognition served the higher level to inspire the Polish faction in the PZPR, the MMA and the MON towards the torpedoing of the Zionist and Trotsky revolution, which succeeded in 1968. From the 1970s, already as a associate of PZPR Kossecki acted as a counterintelligence of the offensive LND, programming the apparatus of the Polish People's Poland in the spirit of Polish nationalism, which caused the hostility of the anti-Polish faction in the PZPR and the political opposition of various divisions protected by it. This is due to years, already in the 3rd Polish National Memorial Institute, as before The purgatory inspired by Western centers, decided to destruct the individual of Józef Kossecki. To this end, a certain number of circumstantial individuals and measures were taken to strike a man, considered a threat to the raging round-table regime, with which Kossecki fought as inactive a associate of the PZPR, and then the leader of organization X, which he was subsequently banned. So why was Joseph Kossecki's docent decided to strike again in 2008?
Because docent Józef Kossecki has always given large importance to training national staff at a advanced level. During this time, many groups operating on the rule of distributed homeostasis and educated in the spirit of technological nationalism were created across Poland – utilizing a methodology developed by Kossecki based on the achievements of the Polish School of Cybernetics and discipline on Civilizations. During meetings and activities on blogs, forums and social networking sites, participants in individual groups undertook substantive criticism of the socio-economic situation, utilizing methods surpassing their competitors, as noted by representatives of the “round-the-clock regime” and considered dangerous. These young students and seminarians of Docent Kossecki began to lie about the grim reality surrounding us. utilizing sociocibernetic methods, they showed unknown facts and began to show and prove (especially with statistics) the neocolonial nature of the strategy that enslaves and destroys Poland. small wonder, then, that the terrified “regime establishment” decided to counter this.
2. BROAD
It was decided to “puzzle” Waldemar Kuczyński, the minister in the government of Tadeusz Mazowiecki, liable for the demolition and submission of many sectors of the Polish economy, under the slogans “privatization” and “restructuring”. This Chazarian chauvinist, during the period of war and occupation, the Kalian kid saved by Poles from the Holocaust, after Nazi “rewarded”. In the methods of indirect disorganization, which he utilized on the Polish economy (which translated automatically into a demographic and social collapse), he achieved the results which he would envy so that he could be envied by many Nazi criminals. Why was Kuczyński launched? Well, he had many individual reasons to destruct Docent Kossecki. First of all, Józef Kossecki – as leader of organization X – enumeratively demonstrated the disastrous activity of Waldemar Kuczyński and many government teams after 1989, and Kuczyński / Balcerowicz's shock therapy itself compared to Nazi criminals' politics. Sociocibernetical methods of the Docent Kossecki enabled the defeat in the presidential election of the head of Waldemar Kuczyński – favored Prime Minister Tadeusz Mazowiecki – by Stanisław Tymiński and yet the resignation of the full Mazowieckie government, which consequently meant the end of Kuczyński's political career. Finally, in the 1960s Józef Kossecki gained cognition of Trotskyst contacts and Stalinist mentors Waldemar Kuczyński. It is worth recalling that Kuczyński was an assistant to 1 of the leading Zionist corpheus of Stalinism – Vladimir Brus, husband of the notorious court murderer Helena Wolina. In his youth, he was associated with the group of Karol Modzelewski, a associate and emissary illegal in Poland, the 4th Communist Internationalism, who wrote along with Jack Kuron, an aberrative mentally “Letter to the Party” where the spirit-compatible Trotsky communism of the Polish Republic of Councils was postulated. Docent Kossecki willingly passed on his cognition and discernment of specified people as Kuczyński (and mostly the full post-solidarity clique) to young adepts who were socially educated in the spirit of technological nationalism, so he was a threat in the long run. Given the large importance of training young fish, Mr. docent had a legitimate hope for homeostate education, which in future could take over the “government of souls” in the reborn Poland.
An additional origin encouraging the government to attack Docent Kossecki was the global situation. Well, you have developed a unique sociocybernetic method of forecasting various phenomena in the world, but in this case it was about global conflicts. As it turned out, the consequence of his late published forecast for 2008 was a double critical point in relations between powers. This forecast was calculated almost by day, and its final consequence was the conflict in Georgia, during the Beijing Olympic Games. This forecast was beneficial for China and Russia, which in the National Democratic League program were indicated as strategical partners (especially the PRC) of the future nationalist Poland. That is why the United States, Germany and another powers of NATO and the EU, who did not like the emergence of Chinese power, threatening their neocolonial order of the world, have decided on the Vistula – where this conflict besides reflected in the ricochet – to launch its channels of information diversion, in order to prevent even the beginning of something beyond their control. On the 1 hand, it was expected to be a replay of the script "Operation Against Tymiński", but this time not very public, due to the fact that it was clearly feared involuntary advertising of Docent Kossecki across the country. However, the first hit came from the mentioned Waldemar Kuczyński. On his own website Kuczyński created a peculiar column entitled “TW “X” – my guardian devil”, where he placed slanders at the address of the Kossecki Docent, as if there were 14 volumes of files of Joseph Kossecki’s notes on Kuczyński, under the expected aliases of TW “X” and “Rybak”. These volumes were not published in their entirety (and even in a large part). Only any missing passages were presented where it turned out that:
– there are no self-signed reports by Józef Kossecki;
– there is not even Kossecki on the cover of the briefcase;
– incorrect registration in the registration log of names – alternatively of Joseph Maria, Joseph Stefan. Counterfeiting and sleazy at the same time – characteristic of nihilistic, overactive ignorants from leftist political opposition environments, alternatively than meticulous in the authoritative work of MMA officers. Kuczyński's explanations, which inactive hang on his website today, that Kossecki abruptly changed his name and that he inactive has Józef Ferdinand in the reserve, attest to the terrible intellectual simplicity of the erstwhile minister;
– there is no work to cooperate and no establishment of fees;
– Pagination is not preserved;
– the documentation is selected;
– materials indicated as tips are not written by hand, but on a machine, which may already be due to 3rd parties, not necessarily from the Ministry of the Interior of Poland, but mainly from the services of the 3rd Republic, including, for example, IPN;
– part of the material is simply a reliable technological analysis, which has no right to be treated as a tip;
– part is called "extracts", which can be prepared by 3rd parties. A large number of inserts were created with a blue thin letter which was not in usage in the 1960s and 1970s. It is so very likely that they were taken in haste, for the intent of the defamatory action of Docent Kossecki;
– the materials are microfilmed, i.e. they are photomontage, a clump, which are claims, so they cannot be evidence of a tip;
Additional information compromising slanderers, specified as Kuczyński or IPN officers, was later revealed the instructions of the erstwhile head of the MMA – General Czesław Kiszczak, about moving sources. It consisted of inserting actual reports of agents or method sources into the records of the persons working. Thus, the talker Joseph Kossecki may have been a victim of specified practices. That's just to explain the methods utilized to destruct people with questionable quality.
The next phase of the operation against Docent Kossecki was an email exchange between Him and Waldemar Kuczyński. The erstwhile minister even went to criminal threats against her. Your docent, utilizing this knayak language and gutter form, as the pupil and yet the typical of the "Jewish-communy" would be. The Docent, on the another hand, kept his class and tranquillity, physically breaking his primitive lies and slander. He showed that in the government, in which the head of the Ministry of the Interior and the Deputy Prime Minister was the supervising safety Service – General Czesław Kiszczak, there could not be an SB victim, but trusted with that service. Mr. Docent besides recalled that Kuczyński was a colleague of Kiszczak from the government, not Kossecki, which the erstwhile minister was incapable to break with counterarguments.
The consequence of this email exchange was an article by Mai Narbutt of March 1, 2008, under the alternatively malicious, intentionive title "Mr Minister and Mr X". However, the article itself in the content was not besides offensive to the Docent. Furthermore, erstwhile witnessing the presence of the author at 1 of the lectures of the Docent, I must say that she was characterized by a alternatively contemporary approach (according to the classification of prof. Wierciński) to nonsubjective truth, a immense deficiency of awareness and the intention mentioned. However, the article spread to its bones and did not origin the crushing effect of Józef Kossecki expected by the inspirers. Then it was besides decided to pull out a much larger information department.
In the autumn of that year, a conference on the national stream in opposition to the times of the Polish People's Republic was planned in Warsaw, in the Porczyński Gallery. The expected intent of this conference was to item the neglected so far in the past of the national movement in the Polish People's Republic. At first glance it may have been interesting, as the past of nationalists in People's Poland is known to a very tiny extent. Especially since in the intention of the conference the main hero was expected to be the organization of the National Democratic League. At first, it seemed interesting. However, after the publication of the overall programme of the conference, together with the speakers, the titles of the lectures and the weight of the genres of the speeches, it abruptly turned out that it would not be a technological conference, how hard it was to advertise it, but a propaganda hucpa, on which the name informatively hit the individual of the prof. Józef Kossecki, accusing him of cooperating with the SB and demonizing his role, like the Gestapo's spic. In order to add spice, in addition to the peculiar IPN to the left-insurgency gadzinówka – “Independent Polish Newspaper”, a foretaste of the article by Paweł Tomasik entitled “The activities of TW “X”, “Frybak” in the light of his own reports” was published. Already the text in the newspaper, which would then be read and possibly extended at the conference, contained a large amount of misinformation and false information in its message. It depicts the Docent of Kossecki as allegedly the most deserved of SB informers, without giving any evidence and disqualifying the author as a investigator without contacting the accused. So Docent decided to send emails to IPN officers, with president Janusz Kurtyka at the head, as well as to Wojciech Muszyński and the author – Paweł Tomasik, in which he warned that letting false papers into circulation is simply a wanted crime. any (like Kurtika) kept the letter silent, while others cowardly tried to throw work at another level of the governing body of this institution.
Seeing that the action of slanderers only grows stronger, as students and seminarians, we decided to take in the defence of our Master. Being a homeostasis dispersed, classical organization without an organization whose only organizer was information based on ethical, ideological and above all cognitive norms, we decided to show the slanderers and ignorant our non-possumus. We were not allowed to destruct another (within little than 2 years) after Archbishop Wielgus of the Polish nationalist and patriot, and at the same time a prominent scientist. During the lectures, we analysed methods of sociotechnical manipulation which were applied to Archbishop Stanisław Wielgus a year and a half earlier, as well as to Bishop Kaczmark and Adam Doboszyński for the dictatorship of the Zionist Stalinist period. They had many common features, only the direction of the arrow on the coordinate axis was changed, but the modules, or absolute values, remained precisely the same. We decided to usage it by exposing slanderers. Pals from Kalisz prepared a large number of flyers in the form of short texts showing the methods utilized by supposedly anti-communist IPN. They described the methods of the Bolshevik repression apparatus, where opponents were shown to be “enemies of the people”, which frequently resulted in death or at best a camp. That's precisely what the IPN does. Sticking a PRL agent tag to his opponents, he treats them in the same way, giving them no rights of defence and ruling on guilt in advance. But there was besides a comparison on the flyers to the Nazi Office for Race, or alleged Rassenamt, where a man without evidence considered a Jew, without the right to defend himself was sentenced to a concentration camp, and frequently to death. The conference area was quite a few confusion and outrage. For the first time in Poland, a state institution has been publically compared, which so far has been regarded as crystal clear and listened to as the Oracle of Delfick, to genocidal and criminal institutions. The leaflets were distributed in an efficient way and, most importantly, reached the table of conference organizers. This caused fear and uncertainty among them on the 1 hand, and rage on the other. Another method was to interrupt the cry of "liar" referring erstwhile they attempted to call Docent Kossecki an agent. This introduced additional stress and fear among organizers and speakers. Those who so far have felt impunity abruptly felt smitten. To the point that any people just started to leave the conference out of fear. This turned out to be Dr. Jan Żaryn, a intellectual officer, then the IPN, now PiS, promoted by the government to a Polish nationalist and Catholic. The problem is that his brother – Stephen Żaryn privately boasted that their grandma was from Kronenberg's house. Jan Żaryn himself, at the turn of 2006/2007, had his shameful part in the hunt for Archbishop Stanislaw Wielgus, discovering his Pharisee (not Catholic) face. So erstwhile Dr. Jan Żaryn received the material on which his colleagues from Kalisz showed that there was no Józef Kossecki on Wildstein's infamous list, his brother Stephen, formerly editor of the weekly “Ekran”, started shaking, got in the car and left.
In turn, in Wojciech Muszyński, fear and stress contributed to the innate stutter, making his study completely incomprehensible and comical. At 1 point, he even wanted to hit 1 of the seminarians from Kalisz, but he withdrew erstwhile another of the seminarians of Docent Kossecki heard he might be on Wildstein's list.
Andrzej Wronka played a immense function in this event. He repeatedly tried to ask questions, and erstwhile the organizers felt that they were besides dangerous for them and exposed their lie, they took distant his chance to speak, so, while in the crowd, he decided to ask questions to respective speakers, which he subsequently reported, showing their smallness. At the very end of the conference, he asked with a voice: "What is the IPN afraid of?".
The conference organizers besides utilized a perfidious social technology of manipulation, trying to break the unity of the National-Democratic League organization. The IPN, being the control object here, decided to divide the LND into 2 sub-groups: The better one. selected and controlled by himself, and the worse, whose discredit is to make common distrust and origin interior disintegration. The first was to be Marian Barański, Przemysław Górny and Henryk Klata, and the second individual of the Docent Józef Kossecki. It is worth remembering that 1 of the individuals of this first group was a criminal, convicted in the 1970s for participation in a criminal band, which did not prevent him from honouring advanced state orders in the IIIrd Republic of Poland. Everyone mentioned in the 1960s had contacts with Trotskyists, primarily with Jack Kuron, so the elder management of the LND and Kossecki himself, knowing this, did not accept them as members of the League, nor did they know the content of the oath. Their reluctance, and frequently even hostility to Kossecki, indicates that they are closer to Trockism than to the national movement, not to mention the LND. The presentation of them as members of the LND was to show a image of this organization, as a subordinate to the remainder of the political opposition, to service anti-Polish purposes. Joseph Kossecki did not fit in, so it was decided to discredit him.
However, this failed, due to the fact that at the climax of the moment, prof. Kossecki entered the area facing amazed and frightened organizers, as well as viewers, wanting to make his statement. Wojciech Muszyński refused. Kossecki was wanted to be thrown out of the area in a Turkish way, with the aid of bodyguards, but they were frightened to see a large group of students surrounding and thus protecting the docent. erstwhile Docent Kossecki started shouting that “These are the methods of Nazi Rassenamt, and Nazism will not pass!”, frightened Muszyński decided to end the conference hucpa IPN. After the conference, before the building, 1 of our colleagues – Grzegorz Dorobek caught up with Paweł Tomasik and brought him to our group, and especially to the face of Docent Kossecki. Tomasik was already as brave as he was before, and he told the prof. that he only referred what he was expected to report, and he did not decide what the fact was. erstwhile the docent removed the press card, Tomasik abruptly replied that they were not allowed to talk to journalists, and then he went away.
By torpedoing this populace of the IPN, we have shown that Polish enemies cannot feel impunityless, even if they are in the advantage they gotta face information resistance, and erstwhile necessary, besides energy-material ones. The event from the Porczyński Gallery was an crucial date in the past of the fight for Poland. This was the only feedback in the past of the 3rd Polish Republic, consisting in causing a step back of the institution, which until then leveled everyone to the ground like a roller. She failed to destruct the individual of the Docent Józef Kossecki and his technological and organizational achievements. Angry slanderers then utilized primitive haters in online forums, who were furious, but thus with acclaim and fear, wrote about the “ormist fighters” that destroyed the IPN conference. On this occasion it is worth reminding that little than 5 years later, in January 2013, they besides tried to organise a likewise slanderous conference, but already in a somewhat more cautious form and content. But there was besides 1 of our colleagues, Grzegorz Dorobek, who asked questions which could not be answered honestly. However, that conference was in no way able to overshadow the 2008 conference.
3. IMPACTS
‘The Independent paper Poland" was published shortly after (November 7, 2008) by the Docent Kossecki, whose presentation was prevented from being presented at the conference, along with the correction of Paweł Tomasik, which looked like a form of withdrawal from charges against the Docent. It turned out that many of the sentences in Tomasik’s text, especially the first and last two, came from the “NGP, ” not from Paul Tomasik, to which she confessed and then withdrew. All of this was filmed and published on the website of Andrzej Wronka, who had conducted a reliable interview with prof. Kossecki a fewer days earlier, where you did a factual analysis and overturned all charges against him. In this interview, Pan docent retained the class, pointing out to slanderers the deficiency of knowledge, awareness, simple logic, and what any even standards below Stalin's. Interestingly, 1 of the prominent politicians present at this conference and, of course, attached to the chorus of slanderers, to whom the Lord docent besides talked out a lot, after years the Docent's argument utilized to defend his organization colleague in 1 of the tv shows. How to learn is only from the best.
The torpedoing of the slanderous IPN conference was an highly crucial event for our environment. It turned out to be a turning point in its development. This resulted in the emergence and growth of many websites, including blogs. It was thanks – as you referred to the docent – to the conflict of the "ipenec" that the serious improvement of Andrzej Wronka's website and his blog began, that blogs specified as: TWX, Polish National Thought, or PMN bloom were created. On their pages there were publications that caused fear among the regime. There, real problems and threats were shown, resulting from the actions of abroad influence channels, inspiring the ruling in III Poland to introduce entropy of the system.
Our winning conflict at the Porczyński Gallery of October 25, 2008 proved to be a strong incentive to make further groups promoting social cybernetics. The emergence of many fresh initiatives took place even after this fight of acceleration. Something called the National Information Academy (NAI) today, and already has its brand and reputation, had its origins just then, 1 Saturday night in Warsaw.
It is worth remembering, and it is simply a work to remind us of the roots of our own environment, and now ours.
For our part, we would like to express our heartfelt thanks for the courageous attitude and effective defence of our Master, present the holy memory, the Lord Docent Joseph Kossecki. For participating in the contravention at the Porczyński Gallery, on October 25, 2008, I thank the Colleagues:
ANDRZEJ WRONCE, GRZEGORZ DOROBK, Friends from Warsaw and Kalisz and many others who had the courage to defy dictatorship and panic of lies.
In the end, it is essential to give designation to the distinguished scientist and our mentor, Docent Józef Kossecki, without whom all this would not have been done. present we believe that he can proudly look at our next initiatives and fresh ideas.
Hi, his memory!
PMN Editorial
